Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $116M | $341.64B | $47.20B | $151.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.09B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $418.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.26B | $123.35B | $32.20B | $102.27B |
| Gross Margin | 95.8% | 41.2% | 12.7% | 56.6% |
| Operating Margin | 30.1% | 10.9% | 1.3% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.5x | 4.1x | 1.5x | 1.2x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $248.49B | $89.77B | $10.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.90B | $181.73B | $108.35B | $57.77B |
YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yuanbao Inc. Americ… (YB) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 118.5 | +18.5% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 94.1 | -5.9% |
| PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 60.6%, EPS growth 360.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 104.3%
- 60.6% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9%
- Lower P/E (0.5x vs 1.2x)
- 30.9% margin vs JD's 2.5%
BABA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- +12.4% vs PDD's -8.1%
JD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- Beta 1.06 vs BABA's 1.21
PDD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 283.2% 10Y total return vs BABA's 84.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.6% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 1.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs JD's 2.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs BABA's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.4% vs PDD's -8.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 35.6% ROA vs JD's 4.6% |
YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YB leads in 3 of 6 categories
BABA leads 1 • JD leads 1 • PDD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 319.0x YB's $4.1B. YB is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JD's 2.5%. On growth, YB holds the edge at +33.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.1B | $1.01T | $1.30T | $418.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $114.6B | $23.8B | $93.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.3B | $123.4B | $32.2B | $102.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $277M | $2.6B | $9.1B | $111.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.8% | +41.2% | +12.7% | +56.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +10.9% | +1.3% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +12.2% | +2.5% | +24.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +0.3% | +0.7% | +26.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.6% | +4.8% | +14.9% | +9.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | -52.0% | -56.3% | +16.5% |
Valuation Metrics
YB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.9x trailing earnings, YB trades at a 95% valuation discount to BABA's 18.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, JD's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BABA's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116M | $341.6B | $47.2B | $151.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$160M | $351.4B | $44.5B | $144.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.91x | 17.99x | 7.78x | 9.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.48x | 4.14x | 1.46x | 1.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.29x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.25x | 13.62x | 6.52x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 2.34x | 0.28x | 2.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.13x | 1.03x | 3.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.66x | 29.80x | 7.27x | 8.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YB delivers a 189.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $189 in annual profit, vs $11 for JD. PDD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JD's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YB scores 8/9 vs JD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +189.2% | +11.2% | +10.5% | +26.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +35.6% | +6.7% | +4.6% | +16.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.6% | +9.9% | +40.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +63.0% | +10.4% | +10.2% | +42.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x | 0.29x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.9B | $66.8B | -$18.6B | -$47.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.9B | $181.7B | $108.3B | $57.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $248.5B | $89.8B | $10.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 15.74x | 12.85x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YB five years ago would be worth $9,687 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,625 for JD. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +12.4% total return vs PDD's -8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.6% vs JD's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.7% | -9.2% | +7.3% | -11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.8% | +12.4% | -7.0% | -8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | +75.4% | -6.8% | +65.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | -35.5% | -53.8% | -24.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | +84.5% | +40.2% | +283.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | +20.6% | -2.3% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
JD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JD currently trades 80.6% from its 52-week high vs YB's 49.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.21x | 1.06x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.00 | $192.67 | $38.08 | $139.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.04 | $103.71 | $24.51 | $95.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.9% | +73.4% | +80.6% | +73.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 49.5 | 49.7 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 10.3M | 10.0M | 6.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BABA and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BABA as "Buy", JD as "Buy", PDD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for PDD (target: $142) vs 7.1% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.57% vs BABA's 1.26%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 | $32.86 | $142.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 45 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.3% | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 | $5.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.8% | +8.1% | 0.0% |
YB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BABA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
YB vs BABA vs JD vs PDD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YB or BABA or JD or PDD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is the stronger pick with 60. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares (YB) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YB or BABA or JD or PDD?
On trailing P/E, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is the cheapest at 0. 9x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 18. 0x. On forward P/E, Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares is actually cheaper at 0. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YB or BABA or JD or PDD?
Over the past 5 years, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) delivered a total return of -3. 1%, compared to -53. 8% for JD. com, Inc. (JD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PDD returned +283. 2% versus YB's -3. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YB or BABA or JD or PDD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 1. 21β — meaning BABA is approximately 14% more volatile than JD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PDD Holdings Inc. (PDD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 29% for JD. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YB or BABA or JD or PDD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) is pulling ahead at 60. 6% versus 5. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Yuanbao Inc. American Depositary Shares grew EPS 360. 0% year-over-year, compared to 70. 9% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, YB leads at 104. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YB or BABA or JD or PDD?
PDD Holdings Inc.
(PDD) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 3. 6% for JD. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PDD leads at 27. 5% versus 3. 3% for JD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YB leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YB or BABA or JD or PDD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Yuanbao Inc.
American Depositary Shares (YB) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 4. 1x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PDD: 38. 8% to $142. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — YB or BABA or JD or PDD?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. YB, PDD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YB or BABA or JD or PDD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +40. 2%, YB: -3. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YB and BABA and JD and PDD?
These companies operate in different sectors (YB (Financial Services) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and JD (Consumer Cyclical) and PDD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: YB is a small-cap high-growth stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PDD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while YB, PDD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.