Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $5.85B | $7.18B | $213.51B | $3.97B | $138.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $942M | $829M | $44.49B | $1.81B | $8.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $169M | $366M | $9.92B | $152M | $2.67B |
| Gross Margin | 91.0% | 83.4% | 54.8% | 32.8% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 22.4% | 49.6% | 25.5% | 12.1% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 39.4x | 38.8x | 18.8x | 23.0x | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $506M | $16.37B | $682M | $4.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $739M | $7.84B | $106M | $2.64B |
YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clear Secure, Inc. (YOU) | 100 | 145.4 | +45.4% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 381.7 | +281.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 141.7 | +41.7% |
| OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) | 100 | 237.2 | +137.2% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 274.3 | +174.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YOU is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.01 vs MRVL's 2.21
IDCC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 45.9%, current ratio 1.84x
- PEG 0.74 vs QCOM's 9.06
- Lower P/E (38.8x vs 41.7x)
- 44.2% margin vs OSIS's 8.4%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs YOU's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 18.4% ROA vs OSIS's 6.3%, ROIC 29.1% vs 11.5%
Among these 5 stocks, OSIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MRVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs IDCC's 436.7%
- 42.1% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
- +184.6% vs OSIS's +8.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.1% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (38.8x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs OSIS's 8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs MRVL's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs YOU's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +184.6% vs OSIS's +8.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs OSIS's 6.3%, ROIC 29.1% vs 11.5% |
YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
YOU leads 2 • MRVL leads 1 • QCOM leads 1 • OSIS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 53.7x IDCC's $829M. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OSIS's 8.4%. On growth, MRVL holds the edge at +22.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $942M | $829M | $44.5B | $1.8B | $8.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $246M | $489M | $12.8B | $229M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $169M | $366M | $9.9B | $152M | $2.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $437M | $580M | $12.5B | $77M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.0% | +83.4% | +54.8% | +32.8% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +49.6% | +25.5% | +12.1% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +44.2% | +22.3% | +8.4% | +32.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.4% | +70.0% | +28.1% | +4.2% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.7% | -2.4% | -3.5% | +2.0% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.2% | -38.0% | +173.0% | -3.8% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.6x trailing earnings, IDCC trades at a 55% valuation discount to MRVL's 52.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $7.2B | $213.5B | $4.0B | $138.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $6.9B | $222.0B | $4.6B | $140.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.93x | 23.62x | 40.43x | 27.68x | 52.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 39.39x | 38.81x | 18.84x | 23.05x | 41.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 19.44x | 1.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.08x | 12.91x | 15.91x | 17.43x | 106.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.50x | 8.61x | 4.82x | 2.32x | 16.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.68x | 8.73x | 10.56x | 4.35x | 9.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.06x | 13.58x | 16.65x | 70.85x | 99.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
YOU leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
YOU delivers a 95.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $95 in annual profit, vs $17 for OSIS. MRVL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MRVL scores 7/9 vs OSIS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +95.0% | +33.4% | +40.2% | +16.7% | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.4% | +17.7% | +18.4% | +6.3% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +68.1% | +40.9% | +29.1% | +11.5% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +34.0% | +38.1% | +28.9% | +16.3% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.46x | 0.77x | 0.72x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$86M | -$233M | $8.5B | $576M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $739M | $7.8B | $106M | $2.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $506M | $16.4B | $682M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.48x | 17.60x | 11.43x | 15.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MRVL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,295 for YOU. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +184.6% total return vs OSIS's +8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MRVL at 57.7% vs QCOM's 25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +70.2% | -14.1% | +17.6% | -5.7% | +79.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +124.1% | +32.4% | +42.9% | +8.9% | +184.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.0% | +251.7% | +96.4% | +103.9% | +291.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | +303.1% | +58.5% | +149.9% | +250.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | +436.7% | +350.2% | +372.9% | +1581.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.1% | +52.1% | +25.2% | +26.8% | +57.7% |
Risk & Volatility
YOU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
YOU is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YOU currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs IDCC's 67.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.12x | 1.55x | 1.44x | 2.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.50 | $412.60 | $223.66 | $311.27 | $175.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.88 | $205.78 | $121.99 | $204.00 | $53.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +67.6% | +90.6% | +77.5% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.6 | 30.8 | 80.1 | 30.1 | 78.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 393K | 15.1M | 285K | 24.8M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YOU as "Buy", IDCC as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", OSIS as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs -19.1% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.75 | $425.00 | $175.00 | $293.50 | $129.52 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 16 | 69 | 17 | 72 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +0.6% | +1.7% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 23 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $1.76 | $3.44 | — | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +1.4% | +4.1% | +2.0% | +1.5% |
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). YOU leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
YOU vs IDCC vs QCOM vs OSIS vs MRVL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) offers the better valuation at 23. 6x trailing P/E (38. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clear Secure, Inc. (YOU) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL?
On trailing P/E, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the cheapest at 23. 6x versus Marvell Technology, Inc. at 52. 1x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InterDigital, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to +52. 9% for Clear Secure, Inc. (YOU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +1581% versus YOU's +52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clear Secure, Inc.
(YOU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 119% more volatile than YOU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, YOU leads at 27. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus 8. 7% for OSI Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus 12. 7% for OSIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YOU leads at 85. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Marvell Technology, Inc. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield), YOU (1. 6% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. OSIS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YOU or IDCC or QCOM or OSIS or MRVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), 0. 6% yield, +436. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDCC: +436. 7%, OSIS: +372. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YOU and IDCC and QCOM and OSIS and MRVL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YOU is a small-cap high-growth stock; IDCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; OSIS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. YOU, IDCC, QCOM pay a dividend while OSIS, MRVL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.