Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $16.76B | $1.84T | $364.18B | $620.85B | $53.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.50T | $1M | $184.43B | $323.90B | $23.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.20T | $-498M | $12.30B | $28.84B | $4.71B |
| Gross Margin | 27.7% | -8.7% | 30.4% | 21.7% | 26.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | -367.6% | 9.0% | 10.5% | 12.4% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 7.5x | 15.0x | 14.8x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $16.18T | $0.00 | $46.74B | $43.54B | $23.96B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.35T | $98M | $6.47B | $10.68B | $1.99B |
YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) | 100 | 1132.3 | +1032.3% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 255.9 | +155.9% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
YPF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 118.7% 10Y total return vs CVX's 135.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, current ratio 0.87x
- 48.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
- Lower P/E (0.0x vs 14.8x)
Among these 5 stocks, SOC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CVX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 3.8%
- Beta -0.05, yield 3.8%, current ratio 1.15x
- 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
XOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- +43.9% vs SOC's -36.8%
- 6.4% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 8.6% vs -44.6%
OXY is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 20.3% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.3% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 14.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 8.6% vs -44.6% |
YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
YPF leads in 2 of 6 categories
OXY leads 1 • XOM leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OXY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YPF is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.50T annually — 18493283.7x SOC's $1M. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, YPF holds the edge at +36.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.50T | $1M | $184.4B | $323.9B | $23.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.01T | -$454M | $37.1B | $59.9B | $10.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.20T | -$498M | $12.3B | $28.8B | $4.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16.3B | -$611M | $16.2B | $23.6B | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | -8.7% | +30.4% | +21.7% | +26.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | -367.6% | +9.0% | +10.5% | +12.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.1% | -391.5% | +6.7% | +8.9% | +20.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -480.4% | +8.8% | +7.3% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.1% | — | -5.3% | -1.3% | -23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -5.4% | -24.5% | -11.0% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
YPF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, XOM trades at a 35% valuation discount to OXY's 33.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, YPF's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 10.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.8B | $1.84T | $364.2B | $620.8B | $53.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.4B | $1.84T | $404.5B | $653.7B | $75.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -19.41x | -3.07x | 27.53x | 21.86x | 33.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.01x | 7.50x | 15.02x | 14.79x | 12.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.43x | — | 10.89x | 10.91x | 6.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | — | 1.97x | 1.92x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 2359.43x | 1.76x | 2.37x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 21.95x | 26.29x | 13.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OXY delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YPF's 1.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), YPF scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.0% | -113.8% | +7.2% | +10.7% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.1% | -28.9% | +4.2% | +6.4% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | -44.6% | +6.2% | +8.6% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | -37.5% | +6.6% | +8.9% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.01x | — | 0.24x | 0.16x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.83T | -$98M | $40.3B | $32.9B | $22.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.35T | $98M | $6.5B | $10.7B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.18T | $0 | $46.7B | $43.5B | $24.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.48x | -2.28x | 17.22x | 69.44x | 3.25x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YPF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in YPF five years ago would be worth $107,268 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YPF at 54.9% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +9.5% | +18.2% | +20.3% | +27.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.4% | -36.8% | +39.5% | +43.9% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +271.5% | +26.5% | +26.7% | +44.9% | -4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +972.7% | +32.6% | +94.0% | +164.6% | +109.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +118.7% | +32.4% | +135.8% | +105.0% | -7.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.9% | +8.2% | +8.2% | +13.2% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — YPF and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YPF currently trades 87.4% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 1.51x | -0.05x | -0.15x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.95 | $35.00 | $214.71 | $176.41 | $67.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.82 | $3.72 | $133.77 | $101.19 | $38.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.4% | +36.7% | +85.0% | +83.0% | +80.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 45.8 | 42.1 | 42.4 | 41.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 5.4M | 11.0M | 18.9M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVX and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: YPF as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", CVX as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", OXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 4.6% for CVX (target: $191). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $27.00 | $190.93 | $160.43 | $56.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 4 | 53 | 55 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.8% | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 8 | 26 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.87 | $4.00 | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.3% | 0.0% |
YPF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). OXY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
YPF vs SOC vs CVX vs XOM vs OXY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) is the stronger pick with 48.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY?
On trailing P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the cheapest at 21.
9x versus Occidental Petroleum Corporation at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, YPF Sociedad Anónima is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY?
Over the past 5 years, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) delivered a total return of +972.
7%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CVX returned +135. 8% versus OXY's -7. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -1137% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 101% for YPF Sociedad Anónima — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) is pulling ahead at 48.
3% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp. grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -149. 6% for YPF Sociedad Anónima. Over a 3-year CAGR, YPF leads at 119. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY?
Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
0% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OXY leads at 17. 2% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OXY leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, YPF Sociedad Anónima (YPF) trades at 0.
0x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Chevron Corporation — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY?
In this comparison, CVX (3.
8% yield), OXY (3. 0% yield), XOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. YPF, SOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is YPF or SOC or CVX or XOM or OXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between YPF and SOC and CVX and XOM and OXY?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: YPF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CVX, XOM, OXY pay a dividend while YPF, SOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.