Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Internet Content & Information
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Internet Content & Information | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $14M | $1.56B | $29.86B | $225M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $209.36B | $5.30B | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-121M | $4.11B | $104M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 37.3% | 48.8% | 91.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | -2.2% | 4.7% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.4x | 36.3x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $130M | $701M | $1.08B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $103M | $682M | $25M |
ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zenvia Inc. (ZENV) | 100 | 4.2 | -95.8% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 32.4 | -67.6% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 147.3 | +47.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZENV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 18.8% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7%
- Beta 0.02 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage
BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +253.6% vs ZENV's -71.4%
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 131.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs SPOK's 13.3%
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 4.03x
SPOK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 36.3x)
- 10.3% margin vs ZENV's -11.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs BAND's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 36.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs ZENV's -11.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs BAND's 1.86, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs ZENV's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs ZENV's -6.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs 0.3% |
ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPOK leads in 3 of 6 categories
ZENV leads 1 • BAND leads 1 • TWLO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPOK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 2024.5x SPOK's $103M. SPOK is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZENV's -11.0%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $209.4B | $5.3B | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$97M | -$4.6B | $415M | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$121M | $4.1B | $104M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $1.8B | $1.0B | $26M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +37.3% | +48.8% | +91.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -2.2% | +4.7% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | +2.0% | +2.0% | +10.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +0.8% | +19.0% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.6% | +1197.2% | +20.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.4% | +39.8% | +3.8% | -64.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ZENV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 98% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ZENV's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $1.6B | $29.9B | $225M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $2.2B | $30.3B | $206M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.81x | -113.15x | 938.43x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.36x | 36.33x | 16.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.87x | 50.39x | 77.16x | 8.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 2.07x | 5.89x | 1.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 3.65x | 4.03x | 1.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.42x | 0.02x | 28.91x | 8.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPOK delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-15 for ZENV. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.2% | +4.0% | +1.3% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | +1.7% | +1.1% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | -1.2% | +1.6% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | -1.6% | +1.9% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.75x | 0.14x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $598M | $399M | -$18M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $103M | $682M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $130M | $701M | $1.1B | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.61x | -10.30x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,194 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $460 for ZENV. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs ZENV's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAND at 62.7% vs ZENV's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.6% | +242.2% | +42.4% | -14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.4% | +253.6% | +90.3% | -26.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.6% | +330.6% | +259.4% | +13.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -61.3% | -35.8% | +61.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | +143.3% | +584.5% | +13.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | +62.7% | +53.2% | +4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZENV and BAND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZENV is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAND's 1.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAND currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs ZENV's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 1.86x | 1.51x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.90 | $49.25 | $201.39 | $19.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $12.57 | $91.84 | $9.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.7% | +98.8% | +97.9% | +56.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 90.4 | 78.4 | 36.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 565K | 670K | 2.2M | 185K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BAND as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for SPOK (target: $15) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.95% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.00 | $185.17 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 52 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +11.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +1.3% |
SPOK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZENV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZENV vs BAND vs TWLO vs SPOK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zenvia Inc.
(ZENV) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +61. 9%, compared to -95. 4% for Zenvia Inc. (ZENV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus ZENV's -95. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zenvia Inc.
(ZENV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 02β versus Bandwidth Inc. 's 1. 86β — meaning BAND is approximately 11087% more volatile than ZENV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zenvia Inc.
(ZENV) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus 0. 7% for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to -104. 1% for Zenvia Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZENV leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK?
Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 4% net margin versus -16. 1% for Zenvia Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPOK leads at 14. 1% versus -1. 9% for BAND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 19. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPOK: 38. 5% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ZENV, BAND, TWLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ZENV or BAND or TWLO or SPOK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) carries a higher beta of 1. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 3%, BAND: +143. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZENV and BAND and TWLO and SPOK?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZENV (Technology) and BAND (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and SPOK (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZENV is a small-cap high-growth stock; BAND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock. SPOK pays a dividend while ZENV, BAND, TWLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.