Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $14M | $2.31B | $29.86B | $8.50B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.10B | $738M | $5.30B | $1.10B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-121M | $-131M | $104M | $217M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 67.1% | 48.8% | 55.6% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.9% | -19.6% | 4.7% | 25.6% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.3x | 35.4x | 26.7x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $130M | $83M | $1.08B | $112M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $117M | $124M | $682M | $329M | $86.81B |
ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zenvia Inc. (ZENV) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| Braze, Inc. (BRZE) | 100 | 24.9 | -75.1% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 42.3 | -57.7% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 86.7 | -13.3% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 119.8 | +19.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ZENV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.02
- Beta 0.02 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage
BRZE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 24.4%, EPS growth -19.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.35x
- 24.4% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +90.3% vs ZENV's -71.4%
MANH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.10, current ratio 1.28x
- Lower P/E (26.7x vs 35.4x)
- 19.7% margin vs BRZE's -17.8%
- 28.0% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs -20.5%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.8%
- PEG 1.12 vs MANH's 1.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.4% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.7x vs 35.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs BRZE's -17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs AMZN's 1.51, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +90.3% vs ZENV's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs BRZE's -12.9%, ROIC 236.8% vs -20.5% |
ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MANH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ZENV leads 1 • TWLO leads 1 • BRZE leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1006.2x BRZE's $738M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRZE's -17.8%. On growth, BRZE holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $738M | $5.3B | $1.1B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$97M | -$131M | $415M | $288M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$121M | -$131M | $104M | $217M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $61M | $1.0B | $380M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | +67.1% | +48.8% | +55.6% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | -19.6% | +4.7% | +25.6% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.0% | -17.8% | +2.0% | +19.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +8.2% | +19.0% | +34.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.6% | +27.9% | +20.0% | +7.4% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.4% | -70.6% | +3.8% | -3.5% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ZENV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 96% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs MANH's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $2.3B | $29.9B | $8.5B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $2.3B | $30.3B | $8.3B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.81x | -18.52x | 938.43x | 39.88x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.32x | 35.36x | 26.69x | 31.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.86x | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.87x | — | 77.16x | 28.67x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 3.13x | 5.89x | 7.86x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | 3.91x | 4.03x | 27.85x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.42x | 37.34x | 28.91x | 22.74x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-23 for BRZE. BRZE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWLO scores 7/9 vs BRZE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.2% | -22.8% | +1.3% | +78.2% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.9% | -12.9% | +1.1% | +28.0% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | -20.5% | +1.6% | +2.4% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | -23.4% | +1.9% | +76.3% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.13x | 0.14x | 0.36x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$42M | $399M | -$216M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $117M | $124M | $682M | $329M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $130M | $83M | $1.1B | $112M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.61x | — | — | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $460 for ZENV. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +90.3% total return vs ZENV's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 53.2% vs ZENV's -16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.6% | -30.6% | +42.4% | -14.2% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.4% | -30.7% | +90.3% | -21.9% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.6% | -20.7% | +259.4% | -15.3% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -75.8% | -35.8% | +8.1% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.4% | -75.8% | +584.5% | +145.1% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.0% | -7.4% | +53.2% | -5.4% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ZENV and TWLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZENV is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs ZENV's 24.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.17x | 1.10x | 1.47x | 1.04x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.90 | $37.67 | $201.39 | $247.22 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.25 | $15.26 | $91.84 | $119.06 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +24.7% | +60.0% | +97.9% | +58.1% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 47.6 | 78.4 | 50.6 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 565K | 3.0M | 2.2M | 678K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRZE as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", MANH as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 87.8% upside for BRZE (target: $42) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $42.44 | $185.17 | $197.25 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 25 | 52 | 15 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.9% | +3.7% | 0.0% |
MANH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ZENV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ZENV vs BRZE vs TWLO vs MANH vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is the stronger pick with 24. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (31. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Braze, Inc. (BRZE) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, Manhattan Associates, Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 24x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -95. 4% for Zenvia Inc. (ZENV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus ZENV's -95. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Zenvia Inc.
(ZENV) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 17β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning AMZN is approximately -993% more volatile than ZENV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Braze, Inc. (BRZE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Braze, Inc.
(BRZE) is pulling ahead at 24. 4% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to -104. 1% for Zenvia Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRZE leads at 27. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN?
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -17. 8% for Braze, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -19. 6% for BRZE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRZE leads at 67. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 24x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) trades at 26. 7x forward P/E versus 35. 4x for Twilio Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRZE: 87. 8% to $42. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ZENV or BRZE or TWLO or MANH or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zenvia Inc.
(ZENV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 17)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZENV: -95. 4%, BRZE: -76. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ZENV and BRZE and TWLO and MANH and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ZENV (Technology) and BRZE (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and MANH (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ZENV is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRZE is a small-cap high-growth stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.