Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $991M | $1.03B | $2.41B | $706M | $3.18B | $341.71B | $908.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $660M | $1.04B | $310M | $618M | $49.28B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $71M | $135M | $69M | $-398M | $13.70B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 54.8% | 64.2% | 69.1% | 4.5% | 61.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 14.0% | 17.9% | 26.2% | -85.4% | 29.3% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 9.5x | 11.4x | 9.7x | 10.6x | 24.3x | 14.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $1.63B | $490M | $117M | $641M | $45.49B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $135M | $181M | $52M | $380M | $10.27B | $343.34B |
AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 102.3 | +2.3% |
| First Busey Corpora… (BUSE) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 231.0 | +131.0% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 128.0 | +28.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +44.5% vs OCFC's +12.3%
OCFC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.3x)
- 4.7% yield, vs KO's 2.6%
BUSE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.68 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.8% margin vs SFNC's -64.3%
- 13.1% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.1%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 186.7%
- PEG 0.83 vs OCFC's 3.41
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SFNC's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KO's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs OCFC's +12.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SFNC's -1.6%, ROIC 15.8% vs -9.1% |
AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 7 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • AMTB leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • BUSE leads 0 • IBCP leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $660M | $1.0B | $310M | $618M | $49.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $103M | $220M | $89M | -$444M | $15.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $71M | $135M | $69M | -$398M | $13.7B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $80M | $172M | $70M | $410M | $12.6B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +54.8% | +64.2% | +69.1% | +4.5% | +61.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +14.0% | +17.9% | +26.2% | -85.4% | +29.3% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +10.7% | +13.0% | +22.1% | -64.3% | +27.8% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +12.0% | +16.5% | +22.6% | +66.4% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | -36.1% | +28.6% | +2.3% | +42.1% | +18.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OCFC and SFNC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 60% valuation discount to KO's 26.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs OCFC's 5.54x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $1.0B | $2.4B | $706M | $3.2B | $341.7B | $908.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $771M | $3.4B | $376.9B | $1.51T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 15.41x | 19.20x | 10.49x | -7.42x | 26.12x | 16.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 9.48x | 11.44x | 9.66x | 10.61x | 24.27x | 14.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.54x | — | 1.99x | — | 2.34x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 27.17x | 13.30x | 9.48x | — | 25.45x | 18.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 1.58x | 2.31x | 2.24x | 5.07x | 7.13x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 0.62x | 1.02x | 1.42x | 0.86x | 9.99x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 13.02x | 13.89x | 10.07x | 7.52x | 64.52x | 9.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +4.3% | +5.7% | +14.2% | -11.5% | +41.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.5% | +0.7% | +1.3% | -1.6% | +13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +2.2% | +5.8% | +10.2% | -9.1% | +15.8% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.7% | +2.3% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +17.3% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.98x | 0.20x | 0.23x | 0.19x | 1.33x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $1.5B | $309M | $65M | $261M | $35.2B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $135M | $181M | $52M | $380M | $10.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $1.6B | $490M | $117M | $641M | $45.5B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.33x | 0.58x | 0.91x | -1.01x | 10.70x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs OCFC's +12.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs OCFC's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +3.3% | +20.3% | +8.3% | +18.7% | +16.4% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +12.3% | +30.1% | +16.5% | +25.0% | +17.7% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +26.0% | +52.1% | +112.6% | +34.8% | +39.3% | +138.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +7.6% | +33.8% | +85.3% | -8.5% | +65.3% | +135.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +34.3% | +74.2% | +186.7% | +25.0% | +115.0% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +8.0% | +15.0% | +28.6% | +10.5% | +11.7% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BUSE and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.83x | 0.74x | 0.68x | 0.84x | -0.24x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $20.61 | $29.10 | $39.16 | $22.62 | $84.04 | $338.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $16.09 | $21.63 | $29.63 | $17.00 | $65.35 | $269.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +87.5% | +97.0% | +87.6% | +96.8% | +94.5% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 45.5 | 57.0 | 49.3 | 52.8 | 49.2 | 72.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 804K | 558K | 139K | 1.1M | 13.6M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — OCFC and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", BUSE as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, OCFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.66% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $19.00 | $29.00 | $38.00 | $23.00 | $86.13 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +4.7% | +3.6% | +3.0% | +3.9% | +2.6% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 14 | 56 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $0.84 | $1.02 | $1.03 | $0.85 | $2.04 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +7.9% | +2.9% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.8% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
AMTB vs OCFC vs BUSE vs IBCP vs SFNC vs KO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately -494% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.
6% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 10. 8% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or OCFC or BUSE or IBCP or SFNC or KO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), 2. 6% yield, +115. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 0%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and OCFC and BUSE and IBCP and SFNC and KO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMTB (Financial Services) and OCFC (Financial Services) and BUSE (Financial Services) and IBCP (Financial Services) and SFNC (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.