Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $233M | $184M | $2.52B | $272M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $105M | $135M | $902M | $120M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $16M | $169M | $25M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 54.3% | 73.6% | 70.3% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 14.1% | 24.3% | 27.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 9.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $70M | $327M | $115M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $26M | $185M | $132M | $343.34B |
EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eagle Financial Ser… (EFSI) | 100 | 167.8 | +67.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EFSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.6%
- NIM 3.3% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +47.1% vs NBTB's +18.3%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- Beta 0.60 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
NBTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
- 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs EFSI's 2.6%
FUNC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.74 vs NBTB's 1.64
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.74 vs 0.81
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.74 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs EFSI's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.1% vs NBTB's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EFSI's 0.5% |
EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 3 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • EFSI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 2681.6x EFSI's $105M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EFSI's 7.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $105M | $135M | $902M | $120M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $23M | $241M | $35M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $16M | $169M | $25M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $11M | $225M | $16M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +54.3% | +73.6% | +70.3% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +14.1% | +24.3% | +27.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +11.5% | +18.8% | +20.5% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +7.9% | +24.9% | +13.1% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.4% | +120.9% | +39.5% | +20.2% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 59% valuation discount to EFSI's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 0.85x vs NBTB's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $233M | $184M | $2.5B | $272M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $227M | $2.7B | $255M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 14.16x | 14.47x | 11.11x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.00x | 11.03x | 11.54x | 9.66x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.06x | 0.85x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.13x | 11.90x | 11.03x | 7.85x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 1.35x | 2.90x | 2.28x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 0.87x | 1.29x | 1.34x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 17.26x | 11.49x | 17.67x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $4 for EFSI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +7.3% | +9.5% | +12.6% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +5.0% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +6.0% | +2.4% | +9.8% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.32x | 0.17x | 0.56x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | $43M | $142M | -$17M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $26M | $185M | $132M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $70M | $327M | $115M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.27x | 0.31x | 1.05x | 0.99x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $24,187 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,813 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, EFSI leads with a +47.1% total return vs NBTB's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 43.0% vs MNSB's 4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +26.5% | +17.6% | +14.3% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.1% | +37.2% | +18.3% | +44.4% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.3% | +13.1% | +48.5% | +192.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.3% | +18.1% | +44.4% | +141.9% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.4% | +135.4% | +108.5% | +361.3% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.3% | +4.2% | +14.1% | +43.0% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNSB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.60x | 0.76x | 0.67x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $25.17 | $48.27 | $42.35 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.70 | $17.86 | $39.20 | $28.00 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +99.0% | +99.8% | +98.9% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.6 | 65.3 | 63.1 | 71.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 45K | 266K | 13K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EFSI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EFSI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FUNC as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs MNSB's 1.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.00 | — | $46.00 | $25.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +1.6% | +3.0% | +2.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | $0.40 | $1.43 | $0.92 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.4% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
FUNC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NBTB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
EFSI vs MNSB vs NBTB vs FUNC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eagle Financial Services, Inc. (EFSI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus Eagle Financial Services, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +141.
9%, compared to +18. 1% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus NBTB's +108. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 58% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
6% net margin versus 7. 9% for Eagle Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 27. 3% versus 9. 5% for EFSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 1. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB).
09Is EFSI or MNSB or NBTB or FUNC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 2. 2% yield, +361. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +361. 3%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EFSI and MNSB and NBTB and FUNC and JPM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EFSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.