Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 37.1x · EV/EBITDA 26.9x · ROE 30.2%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $88.8B | $84.6B | $84.8B | $90.1B | $58.1B | $102.6B | $87.2B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $84.5B | $80.3B | $80.2B | $85.6B | $53.1B | $98.9B | $84.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 37.12 | 33.68 | 31.97 | 18.80 | 30.65 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.25 | 6.91 | 7.63 | 9.09 | 6.92 | 17.12 | 25.82 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 11.37 | 10.31 | 10.08 | 11.04 | 10.46 | 21.48 | 30.05 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 19.11 | 18.20 | 18.76 | 23.20 | 17.07 | 44.34 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 19.11 | 18.20 | 18.76 | 23.20 | 16.95 | 44.34 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.56 | 7.22 | 8.63 | 6.32 | 16.51 | 24.88 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.93 | 25.59 | 30.63 | 54.77 | 28.20 | 174.44 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 33.21 | 25.59 | 24.07 | 39.16 | 28.08 | 716.73 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.28 | 17.75 | 22.03 | 15.60 | 42.76 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | 83.0% | 83.1% | 82.8% | 82.2% | 80.7% | 74.1% | 75.1% | 76.3% |
| Operating Margin | 20.8% | 20.8% | 23.0% | 15.3% | 21.5% | 7.2% | -106.3% | -10.4% | 0.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 20.5% | 20.5% | 23.9% | 48.3% | 22.5% | -5.9% | -135.7% | -14.0% | -0.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 30.2% | 30.2% | 31.9% | 69.8% | 36.6% | -9.2% | -437.9% | — | — |
| ROA | 11.6% | 11.6% | 12.7% | 26.1% | 12.7% | -2.9% | -48.8% | -9.0% | -0.3% |
| ROIC | 49.2% | 49.2% | 51.5% | 55.3% | 163.9% | 73.4% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 26.3% | 26.3% | 23.8% | 16.2% | 23.4% | 6.8% | -85.2% | -16.8% | 0.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.80 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 1.48 | 1.24 | 4.26 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.52 | -0.54 | -0.56 | -0.91 | -0.76 | -1.09 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.37 | -1.37 | -1.75 | -2.93 | -2.67 | -6.44 | — | — | -21.17 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.92 | -1.01 | -1.18 | -1.48 | -1.58 | — | -16.39 | -4.24 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | 26.33 | 78.79 | 0.32 | -26.27 | -40.30 | 2.80 |
Net cash position: cash ($6.6B) exceeds total debt ($2.3B)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 1.66 | 1.86 | 1.95 | 1.73 | 1.25 | 1.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 1.66 | 1.86 | 1.95 | 1.73 | 1.25 | 1.57 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.81 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.21 | 1.31 | 1.24 | 0.59 | 0.89 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.58 | 0.55 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 213.05 | 199.83 | 223.56 | 216.55 | 226.30 | 235.68 | 238.93 | 230.38 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.1% | 5.3% | 3.3% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 5.2% | 5.5% | 5.3% | 4.3% | 5.9% | 2.3% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 4.3% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 4.5% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 2.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $623M | $645M | $662M | $680M | $616M | $594M | $531M | $531M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ABNB stock.
Airbnb, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 37.1x. The historical average is 28.8x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Airbnb, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 26.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 34.8x.
Airbnb, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 30.2%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -46.4%.
Based on historical data, Airbnb, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 37.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Airbnb, Inc. has 83.0% gross margin and 20.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Airbnb, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.7x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory supply shocks
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Resilience Amid Seasonal Swings
Gross margin held at 82.5% in 2026Q2, while operating margin swung from 39.7% in 2025Q3 to 21.0% in 2026Q2, reflecting extreme seasonality and fixed cost leverage.
The stability of gross margin near 82-87% across ten quarters underscores the asset-light, fee-based model's pricing power, but operating margin volatility of over 38 percentage points between Q1 troughs and Q3 peaks reveals a high fixed-cost base in R&D and SG&A. Net margin of 22.6% in 2026Q2, though below the 33.6% peak in 2025Q3, still exceeds the 12.3% in 2025Q4, suggesting that profitability is normalizing toward mid-20s levels rather than collapsing. Investors should monitor whether regulatory costs or increased performance marketing erode the structural gross margin advantage, as the current spread over peers like Expedia (8.8% net margin) remains wide.
ROIC Cyclicality Masks Compounding
ROIC peaked at 41.8% in 2024Q3 and 39.3% in 2025Q3, but fell to 17.4% in 2026Q2, illustrating that returns are highly seasonal and dependent on Q3 demand spikes.
The quarterly ROIC pattern—ranging from 0.9% in Q1 to over 40% in Q3—demonstrates that the platform's return on invested capital is driven by revenue concentration in peak travel periods, not by structural efficiency gains. Despite the volatility, the average ROIC across the ten quarters is approximately 15%, which still exceeds the cost of capital, indicating value creation, but the trend is not consistently compounding. The asset-light model means ROIC is less sensitive to capital intensity and more to margin retention; the 2026Q2 ROIC of 17.4% is below the year-ago 17.4% (same), suggesting a plateau. If Q3 2026 fails to replicate the 39%+ ROIC of prior years, it would signal a structural decay in returns.
Working Capital Efficiency Distorted by Float
DSO spiked to 303 days in 2025Q2 and 319 days in 2024Q2, but these figures are inflated by guest funds held before remittance, not by slow collections, per financial statements.
The reported DSO of 303 days in 2025Q2 and 306 days in 2025Q1 appears alarming, but it reflects the timing of when revenue is recognized (at check-in) versus when cash is collected (at booking), creating a large receivable balance that is essentially a float. The absence of DIO data and a DPO of 23-39 days indicates minimal inventory and modest supplier leverage, consistent with a marketplace model. The cash conversion cycle cannot be computed due to missing DIO, but the negative working capital dynamics—where guest prepayments fund operations—are a key efficiency advantage. Investors should adjust DSO to exclude the guest float to see true collection efficiency, which is likely near zero days.
Conservative Leverage with Hidden Float
Debt-to-equity rose modestly to 0.32 in 2026Q2 from 0.27 in 2024Q4, while interest coverage of 25.24x in 2026Q2 indicates ample debt service capacity, per balance sheet data.
The low and stable D/E ratio, combined with a cash position of $6.8 billion that includes guest float, suggests a fortress balance sheet, but the float is not the company's own capital and should be excluded when assessing true leverage. Interest coverage of 25.24x in 2026Q2 is robust, though it was not reported in prior quarters, and the D/EBITDA of 2.67x in 2026Q2 is manageable. The slight increase in D/E from 0.27 to 0.32 is likely due to buybacks reducing equity, not new debt, as total debt has remained near $2.5 billion. The risk is not solvency but the opportunity cost of holding excess cash that could be returned to shareholders or invested in growth.
Liquidity Buffer Adequate but Float-Dependent
Current ratio improved to 1.41 in 2026Q2 from 1.23 in 2025Q2, but the quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating no inventory reliance, though cash includes guest funds.
The current ratio of 1.41 and quick ratio of 1.41 in 2026Q2 suggest a comfortable liquidity position, but the $6.8 billion cash balance includes funds held on behalf of guests, which are liabilities, not available for general corporate use. Excluding the float, the true liquidity buffer is thinner, though still likely adequate given the asset-light model and minimal fixed obligations. The seasonal pattern—current ratio dipping to 1.23 in 2025Q2—reflects timing of payables and receivables, but the company has never fallen below 1.2, indicating a stable buffer. Under a severe demand shock, the lack of inventory and low fixed costs would preserve cash, but regulatory actions that abruptly cut supply could strain liquidity if refunds are required.
Misapplied ROE in a Buyback-Driven Model
ROE of 30.2% appears stellar, but it is inflated by aggressive share repurchases that shrink equity, not by operational improvements, as retained earnings remain deeply negative.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Airbnb is ROE, because the denominator—shareholders' equity—is artificially depressed by cumulative buybacks and a negative retained earnings balance of -$6.7 billion. A trailing ROE of 30.2% overstates the return on actual invested capital, as the company's equity base is only $7.8 billion despite cumulative profits exceeding $6 billion. Analysts should use ROIC, which adjusts for cash and debt, or normalize equity by adding back cumulative buybacks, to get a true picture of value creation. The high ROE also masks the fact that buybacks at a P/E of 45.67 may destroy value if the stock is overvalued, making the metric misleading for capital allocation assessment.