Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -19.2x · EV/EBITDA 10.6x · ROE N/A. (2008–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $800M | $1.3B | $1.0B | $5.3B | $31.0B | $563M | $852M | $1.8B | $2.2B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.5B | $8.5B | $9.0B | $9.3B | $14.7B | $40.1B | $11.6B | $10.9B | $7.0B | $7.0B | $4.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | -19.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.44 | — | 33.75 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 1.36 | 12.25 | 0.45 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.43 | 1.17 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.70 | 1.30 | 1.04 | 1.87 |
| P/FCF | 10.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17.35 | — | — | 377.06 |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.47 | 3.46 | 4.08 | 8.73 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.75 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 3.76 | 15.87 | 9.37 | 2.00 | 1.27 | 1.38 | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.64 | 24.04 | 37.34 | 31.94 | — | — | — | 18.67 | 8.67 | 10.92 | 8.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 234.70 | — | 96.24 | 515.78 | — | — | — | 64.66 | 14.93 | — | 15.63 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 222.81 | — | — | 423.90 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 67.0% | 67.0% | 66.7% | 66.6% | 67.3% | 70.5% | 66.9% | 63.8% | 63.7% | 63.5% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 0.8% | -1.7% | -1.5% | -13.4% | -36.8% | -330.2% | 2.5% | 4.9% | 2.0% | 6.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | -13.0% | -13.0% | -7.6% | -8.2% | -24.9% | -50.2% | -369.4% | -2.7% | 2.0% | -9.6% | 3.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -11.4% | 6.3% | -23.6% | 6.5% |
| ROA | -7.8% | -7.8% | -4.1% | -4.4% | -9.8% | -12.0% | -38.3% | -1.3% | 1.1% | -5.3% | 1.7% |
| ROIC | 0.5% | 0.5% | -1.0% | -0.8% | -5.5% | -9.0% | -31.5% | 1.1% | 3.0% | 1.6% | 8.4% |
| ROCE | 0.6% | 0.6% | -1.1% | -1.0% | -6.3% | -10.5% | -40.1% | 1.4% | 3.2% | 1.3% | 3.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.53 | 3.91 | 2.42 | 0.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 22.99 | 22.99 | 34.46 | 31.45 | — | — | — | 17.67 | 6.80 | 7.98 | 1.38 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8.31 | 3.68 | 2.27 | 0.23 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 21.78 | 21.78 | 31.83 | 28.41 | — | — | — | 17.21 | 6.41 | 7.49 | 0.96 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 205.46 | — | — | 46.83 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.18 | -0.18 | 0.21 | 0.04 | -1.56 | -1.79 | -11.69 | 0.50 | — | — | 2.23 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.54 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 1.05 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.57 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.71 | 0.51 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.55 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.37 | 0.89 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.17 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.38 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 30.17 | 40.67 | 35.17 | 23.82 | 19.32 | 52.74 | 56.28 | 54.60 | 42.41 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 11.84 | 13.34 | 15.56 | 15.64 | 24.60 | 29.08 | 17.74 | 19.00 | 21.41 | 25.09 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | 1.2% | 9.9% | 14.3% | 4.8% | 2.1% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 234.4% | — | 68.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6.1% | — | 3.0% |
| FCF Yield | 9.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.8% | — | — | 0.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 24.6% | 1.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.2% | 9.9% | 38.9% | 6.3% | 2.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $513M | $333M | $168M | $131M | $114M | $27M | $12M | $15M | $15M | $11M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 18 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AMC stock.
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -19.2x. The historical average is 25.3x.
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 10.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.2x.
Based on historical data, AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -19.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. has 67.0% gross margin and 0.8% operating margin.
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 23.0x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Debt service and dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Negative Earnings Distort Multiples
Based on reported figures, AMC trades at 0.37x sales and 26.86x trailing EV/EBITDA against a negative trailing P/E of -2.55, so earnings-based multiples are not analytically meaningful while the company remains loss-making on a trailing basis.
The 13.16x forward EV/EBITDA is roughly half the trailing figure, which suggests the market expects EBITDA to expand as the record Q3 2026 revenue flows through, though this forward estimate is not verifiable from the supplied data. Versus peers, Cinemark trades at 14.68x EV/EBITDA and Marcus at 12.40x, so AMC's trailing EV/EBITDA premium appears driven by depressed denominator earnings rather than superior asset quality. Investors should weight enterprise value against the roughly $7.6B debt load, since equity value is a small residual of total capitalization.
Record Revenue Yet Thin Margins
As reported in financial statements, AMC's Q3 2026 operating margin of 14.5% and net margin of 6.4% improved sharply from negative readings in early 2026, yet trailing net margin remains -13.0% against Cinemark's 4.4% and IMAX's 8.5%.
Gross margin has held in a tight 65% to 69% band across all ten quarters, indicating that cost of revenue scales with volume and that gains are coming from operating leverage on a largely fixed occupancy base. The Q3 2026 net margin of 6.4% is the first clearly positive quarter in the window, but a single strong quarter does not offset the cumulative losses that still dominate the trailing picture. Operating margin is the more reliable indicator of earning power here, since net margin is heavily distorted by interest expense and non-cash items.
ROIC Stuck Below Cost of Capital
According to recent SEC filings, AMC's ROIC of 3.4% in 2026Q3 and ROA of 1.4% remain well below the 7.5% ROIC posted by Cinemark, indicating that the capital base is not yet earning returns that justify its debt-funded structure.
ROIC has oscillated between roughly -0.6% and 3.4% over the ten quarters, showing no sustained compounding trajectory despite improving operating results. ROE is not meaningful given the stockholders' deficit, so ROIC and ROA are the appropriate lenses for judging capital productivity. The returns gap versus peers suggests that the heavy lease and debt capital employed has yet to generate returns above its own cost, which may warrant further investigation into the sustainability of recent margin improvement.
Debt Service Coverage Turns Fragile
Based on reported figures, AMC's interest coverage of 2.06x in 2026Q3 and 2.02x in 2026Q2 represents a recovery from near-zero or negative coverage in 2025, yet total debt of $7.6B against $8.0B of assets leaves little cushion.
The coverage ratio has improved from negative readings in 2025 to roughly 2x in the two most recent quarters, but a 2x coverage level leaves limited room for any operating shortfall or rate increase. Debt-to-EBITDA ratios in the 23x to 28x range in recent quarters compare unfavorably with the sector and indicate the debt burden is large relative to current earnings power. Refinancing and maturity risk, along with the possibility of further equity dilution, warrant close monitoring, though the supplied data does not confirm specific maturity schedules.
Current Ratio Below One Persistently
As reported in financial statements, AMC's current ratio of 0.58 at 2026Q3 and quick ratio of 0.58 indicate current liabilities exceed liquid assets, with cash of $751.9M providing a thin buffer against near-term obligations.
The current ratio has remained below 0.65 across all ten quarters, suggesting the company operates structurally with negative working capital, which is common in exhibition businesses that collect cash in advance through admissions and gift cards. Deferred revenue rising to $906.9M adds to current liabilities but also reflects prepaid demand, so the low ratio is partly a function of the business model rather than pure distress. Under severe stress, however, the reliance on continued operating inflows rather than balance sheet liquidity remains the central vulnerability.
EBITDA Multiple Flatters the Picture
Based on EDBL's reported figures, the 13.16x forward EV/EBITDA appears attractive only if EBITDA adjusts for lease and impairment items, because the metric ignores the substantial operating lease obligations embedded in AMC's occupancy costs.
EV/EBITDA is the most commonly misapplied multiple for theater operators because it treats rent expense as a below-the-line item under the pre-ASC 842 framing, which can understate the true cash cost of the business. Free cash flow yield and EBITDA-minus-rent (EBITDAR-adjusted) multiples provide a more conservative view of what equity holders actually retain. Modeling should prioritize free cash flow over EBITDA to account for heavy maintenance capital expenditure, which has run between 2.8% and 6.9% of revenue across the period.