Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -35.0x · EV/EBITDA 16.4x · ROE -21.8%. (2004–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.4B | $325M | $282M | $265M | $1.3B | $4.5B | $8.2B | $386M | $271M | $141M | $63M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.7B | $656M | $660M | $621M | $1.6B | $4.9B | $8.2B | $385M | $260M | $138M | $69M |
| P/E Ratio → | -34.97 | — | — | — | 77.25 | 125.17 | 229.60 | 26.94 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.47 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 1.89 | 6.01 | 11.03 | 2.78 | 2.62 | 1.89 | 0.68 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.78 | 1.69 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 2.07 | 8.71 | 56.84 | 4.98 | 7.45 | 5.10 | 1.01 |
| P/FCF | 124.76 | 29.07 | — | — | 286.14 | 50.23 | 153.91 | 14.55 | — | 28.39 | — |
| P/OCF | 33.38 | 7.78 | 23.75 | 22.27 | 43.88 | 39.66 | 131.35 | 12.30 | 213.59 | 20.27 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.16 | 1.35 | 1.14 | 2.41 | 6.56 | 11.01 | 2.78 | 2.51 | 1.85 | 0.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.37 | 6.22 | 22.90 | — | 12.61 | 32.78 | 55.00 | 24.78 | 41.86 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 50.72 | — | — | — | 72.85 | 111.60 | 89.26 | 29.17 | 75.47 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 58.66 | — | — | 364.70 | 54.82 | 153.63 | 14.53 | — | 27.78 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 48.6% | 48.6% | 45.0% | 45.4% | 48.1% | 46.4% | 46.4% | 38.7% | 34.3% | 33.5% | 14.6% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 6.0% | -11.0% | -68.8% | 6.9% | 12.3% | 12.3% | 9.5% | 3.3% | -7.8% | -24.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.7% | -6.7% | -18.8% | -77.2% | 2.5% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 10.0% | -5.8% | -70.7% | -26.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -21.8% | -21.8% | -50.1% | -102.3% | 3.0% | 10.7% | 31.9% | 24.4% | -18.8% | -117.8% | -33.6% |
| ROA | -4.6% | -4.6% | -11.0% | -39.4% | 1.2% | 4.1% | 16.0% | 10.4% | -7.1% | -54.4% | -21.1% |
| ROIC | 4.8% | 4.8% | -7.4% | -36.9% | 3.7% | 13.1% | 66.9% | 19.4% | 10.4% | -9.4% | -22.0% |
| ROCE | 5.9% | 5.9% | -8.9% | -44.7% | 4.4% | 15.1% | 73.7% | 18.1% | 8.1% | -9.9% | -27.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.72 | 1.82 | 0.69 | 1.04 | 0.11 | 0.27 | — | 0.36 | 0.21 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.50 | 3.50 | 14.50 | — | 3.31 | 3.59 | 0.11 | 1.36 | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.72 | 2.46 | 1.66 | 0.57 | 0.80 | -0.10 | -0.01 | -0.30 | -0.11 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.14 | 3.14 | 13.11 | — | 2.72 | 2.74 | -0.10 | -0.04 | -1.78 | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 29.58 | — | — | 78.56 | 4.59 | -0.28 | -0.02 | — | -0.61 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.53 | -0.53 | -1.53 | — | 0.94 | 5.18 | 91.97 | — | 3.08 | -2.81 | -6.34 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.20 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.77 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 1.20 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.86 | 0.77 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 2.87 | 0.75 | 1.25 | 0.86 | 0.85 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 162.23 | 141.43 | 128.05 | 97.67 | 128.47 | 30.26 | 87.19 | 80.02 | 83.25 | 42.51 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.4% | 3.7% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.8% | 3.4% | — | — | 0.3% | 2.0% | 0.6% | 6.9% | — | 3.5% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $113M | $104M | $101M | $102M | $103M | $103M | $90M | $77M | $70M | $67M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 23 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying APPS stock.
Digital Turbine, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -35.0x. The historical average is 76.5x.
Digital Turbine, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 16.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.0x.
Digital Turbine, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -21.8%. The historical average is -69.2%.
Based on historical data, Digital Turbine, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -35.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Digital Turbine, Inc. has 48.6% gross margin and 6.0% operating margin.
Digital Turbine, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and negative margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery Masks Persistent Losses
According to the latest quarterly data, APPS gross margin normalized to 49.4% in 2027Q1, while operating margin expanded to 13.9%, yet net margin remained negative at -1.9%, indicating non-operating charges still weigh on profitability.
The dramatic swing in gross margin from 7.6% in 2026Q4 to 91.9% in 2026Q3 highlights revenue recognition timing and segment mix, but the 49.4% level in 2027Q1 appears more sustainable. Operating margin turned positive for the first time in the series, reflecting cost discipline and revenue growth, yet the persistent gap between operating and net income suggests interest and other non-operating expenses continue to erode bottom-line results. Investors should monitor whether the operating leverage can overcome these fixed charges to achieve sustained net profitability.
ROIC Inflection Points to Turnaround
Based on reported figures, APPS ROIC turned positive at 3.4% in 2027Q1, a sharp reversal from -2.1% in 2025Q1, while ROE improved to -1.6% from -12.3%, suggesting the operational turnaround is beginning to generate returns on invested capital.
The positive ROIC in 2027Q1, despite negative ROE, indicates that operating profits are now exceeding the cost of capital on an after-tax basis, a critical milestone after several quarters of value destruction. The improvement is driven by margin expansion rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover remained low at 0.20. However, the negative ROE reflects the lingering impact of accumulated losses and high leverage, implying that shareholder value creation is still constrained by the balance sheet structure.
Working Capital Drag Persists
As reported in the financial statements, APPS DSO remained elevated at 141 days in 2027Q1, while DPO swung from 903 days in 2026Q3 to 154 days, indicating volatile payment terms and ongoing working capital absorption that pressures cash conversion.
The high DSO of around 140-150 days across the series suggests that the company extends significant credit to its advertising and carrier partners, tying up cash in receivables. The extreme DPO volatility, particularly the 903-day figure in 2026Q3, likely reflects one-time timing effects or renegotiated terms, but the normalization to 154 days in 2027Q1 still implies a cash conversion cycle that remains positive and burdensome. This working capital intensity may limit free cash flow generation despite improving operating margins, warranting close monitoring of receivable collections and payment terms.
Debt Burden Eases but Remains Heavy
According to the latest balance sheet data, APPS reduced its debt-to-equity ratio from 2.72 in 2025Q4 to 1.85 in 2027Q1, yet interest coverage of 2.65x remains thin, indicating that debt service still consumes a significant portion of operating income.
The deleveraging trend is encouraging, with total debt down to $352.9M, but the absolute level remains high relative to equity of $190.6M. Interest coverage improved from negative levels to 2.65x in 2027Q1, reflecting the operating turnaround, but this still leaves limited cushion for earnings volatility. The D/EBITDA ratio of 8.85x remains elevated compared to peers, suggesting that refinancing risk and covenant sensitivity could become material if cash flows deteriorate.
Thin Liquidity Buffer Improves
Based on reported figures, APPS current ratio improved to 1.20 in 2027Q1 from 1.03 a year earlier, with cash of $43.2M, providing a modest cushion against short-term obligations but still below the peer average.
The liquidity position has strengthened, but the current ratio of 1.20 remains thin, implying that the company relies heavily on operating cash flow to meet near-term liabilities. The quick ratio equals the current ratio at 1.20, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, consistent with a software model. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp ad-spend downturn, the cash buffer may prove insufficient, especially given the high debt service requirements.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Cash Generation
The most commonly misapplied ratio for APPS is EV/EBITDA, which at 19.58x appears reasonable, but it ignores the substantial non-cash charges and working capital swings that distort EBITDA, making P/FCF or EV/EBIT more appropriate for this business.
EBITDA for APPS is heavily inflated by large depreciation and amortization charges from past acquisitions, which are non-cash but represent real economic costs as intangibles are consumed. Additionally, the company's working capital volatility and high DSO mean that EBITDA does not translate into cash flow, as evidenced by the P/FCF of 155x versus EV/EBITDA of 19.58x. Analysts should adjust for these factors by focusing on unlevered free cash flow or EBIT after amortization to better capture the underlying earnings power and avoid overstating the company's valuation attractiveness.