Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.0x · EV/EBITDA 10.1x · ROE 10.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $611M | $519M | $481M | $476M | $561M | $566M | $463M | $566M | $450M | $461M | $530M |
| Enterprise Value | $611M | $519M | $360M | $405M | $604M | $179M | $170M | $862M | $954M | $738M | $829M |
| P/E Ratio → | 13.95 | 11.85 | 16.22 | 15.79 | 11.51 | 11.37 | 11.36 | 15.13 | 12.44 | 15.71 | 19.96 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.69 | 3.13 | 3.44 | 3.55 | 3.76 | 3.97 | 3.51 | 4.86 | 3.99 | 4.38 | 5.33 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.41 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.25 | 1.59 | 1.53 | 1.38 | 1.88 | 1.67 | 1.85 | 2.28 |
| P/FCF | 16.88 | 14.33 | 16.65 | 35.26 | 12.35 | 9.27 | 12.45 | 15.66 | 12.21 | 13.09 | 15.93 |
| P/OCF | 14.80 | 12.56 | 13.95 | 23.13 | 9.40 | 8.30 | 10.94 | 12.89 | 10.73 | 12.19 | 15.27 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.13 | 2.57 | 3.02 | 4.04 | 1.25 | 1.29 | 7.40 | 8.44 | 7.01 | 8.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.05 | 8.53 | 8.42 | 9.16 | 8.57 | 2.48 | 2.89 | 16.40 | 19.05 | 16.31 | 18.98 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.03 | 9.36 | 9.63 | 10.80 | 9.60 | 2.78 | 3.27 | 18.32 | 21.05 | 18.52 | 21.97 |
| EV / FCF | — | 14.33 | 12.46 | 30.01 | 13.28 | 2.93 | 4.56 | 23.85 | 25.87 | 20.95 | 24.94 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 65.3% | 65.3% | 60.4% | 68.1% | 90.0% | 96.3% | 84.8% | 82.8% | 88.0% | 91.3% | 92.9% |
| Operating Margin | 22.8% | 22.8% | 16.7% | 19.6% | 39.2% | 43.5% | 35.9% | 34.0% | 36.1% | 35.5% | 36.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | 18.1% | 18.1% | 13.3% | 15.7% | 30.4% | 33.7% | 28.2% | 27.1% | 28.9% | 26.1% | 25.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.6% | 10.6% | 7.6% | 8.2% | 13.5% | 14.1% | 12.8% | 13.1% | 14.0% | 12.2% | 11.9% |
| ROA | 1.0% | 1.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| ROIC | 9.3% | 9.3% | 6.3% | 6.2% | 10.5% | 11.2% | 7.1% | 4.6% | 4.7% | 5.0% | 5.3% |
| ROCE | 2.6% | 2.6% | 7.9% | 8.3% | 13.7% | 14.1% | 12.6% | 12.7% | 13.0% | 11.8% | 11.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 1.21 | 2.18 | 1.40 | 1.53 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.79 | 1.62 | 1.52 | 0.97 | 1.49 | 6.97 | 11.74 | 7.73 | 8.17 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | -0.30 | -0.19 | 0.12 | -1.04 | -0.88 | 0.98 | 1.87 | 1.11 | 1.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.00 | 0.00 | -2.83 | -1.60 | 0.60 | -5.37 | -4.99 | 5.63 | 10.06 | 6.12 | 6.85 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.00 | -4.19 | -5.26 | 0.93 | -6.35 | -7.89 | 8.19 | 13.65 | 7.87 | 9.01 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.45 | 0.65 | 5.56 | 12.40 | 4.09 | 2.17 | 3.63 | 5.69 | 7.05 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.1% | 3.6% | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 3.4% | 2.7% | 3.2% | 3.0% | 2.5% |
| Payout Ratio | 43.0% | 43.0% | 61.6% | 59.8% | 35.7% | 32.7% | 38.6% | 40.6% | 39.7% | 46.4% | 49.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 7.2% | 8.4% | 6.2% | 6.3% | 8.7% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 6.6% | 8.0% | 6.4% | 5.0% |
| FCF Yield | 5.9% | 7.0% | 6.0% | 2.8% | 8.1% | 10.8% | 8.0% | 6.4% | 8.2% | 7.6% | 6.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.8% | 5.6% | 5.2% | 4.5% | 3.6% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 3.1% | 3.7% | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $17M | $16M | $16M | $16M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AROW stock.
Arrow Financial Corporation's current P/E ratio is 14.0x. The historical average is 14.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Arrow Financial Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 10.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.1x.
Arrow Financial Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.6%. The historical average is 14.6%.
Based on historical data, Arrow Financial Corporation is trading at a P/E of 14.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Arrow Financial Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.10% with a payout ratio of 43.0%.
Arrow Financial Corporation has 65.3% gross margin and 22.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Arrow Financial Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Credit quality and NIM compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Priced, Earnings Under Pressure
AROW trades at 1.52x tangible book, a premium to peers like TRST (1.52x) and NECB (1.04x), yet its ROE of 2.5% lags the group, suggesting the market may be pricing in a recovery that has not materialized.
The forward P/E of 11.33 implies the market expects earnings to rebound sharply from the depressed TTM level, but the recent EPS miss and credit event cast doubt on that trajectory. The P/B of 1.52 is in line with TRST but well above NECB's 1.04, yet AROW's return on tangible equity is far below NECB's 12.6%, indicating the premium is not justified by current profitability. Investors should monitor whether the bank can restore ROE to historical levels to support the multiple.
ROE Collapse on Credit and Margin
ROE has fallen from 2.3% in 2024Q2 to 2.5% in 2026Q2, but the 2026Q2 NIM turned negative at -1.6%, and the efficiency ratio spiked to 92.6%, indicating severe profitability strain.
The DuPont decomposition shows that the negative NIM in 2026Q2 is the primary driver of the ROE collapse, as asset yields have failed to keep pace with rising deposit costs. The efficiency ratio of 92.6% in 2026Q2 is unsustainable, implying that for every dollar of revenue, only 7.4 cents remain after operating expenses, leaving little room for credit costs or dividends. The fee income contribution of 3.2% in 2026Q2 is a sharp drop from the 13-14% range seen in prior quarters, suggesting that non-interest income may be volatile and not providing the expected buffer.
NIM Turns Negative, Efficiency Breaks
Net interest margin fell to -1.6% in 2026Q2, a dramatic reversal from the 0.7-0.8% range of the prior year, while the efficiency ratio soared to 92.6%, according to quarterly data.
The negative NIM indicates that funding costs have overwhelmed asset yields, a critical issue for a bank whose core business is spread lending. The efficiency ratio spike suggests that the bank's cost structure is not flexible enough to absorb revenue declines, possibly due to the dual-brand overhead and compliance costs. This combination implies that the bank's core earnings power is severely impaired, and unless deposit costs recede or asset yields improve, profitability will remain under pressure.
Thin Capital Buffer Limits Flexibility
Equity to assets ratio has hovered around 9-10% over the past year, as per balance sheet data, which is adequate but leaves little room for absorbing credit losses or funding growth without raising capital.
The equity ratio of approximately 10% is typical for a community bank, but the recent credit event and potential for further reserve builds could erode capital. The bank's low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.07% suggests a conservative funding structure, but the lack of a robust capital buffer may constrain dividend growth or share buybacks. Investors should monitor whether the bank can maintain its dividend, which currently yields 2.9%, given the strained earnings.
Credit Event Raises Reserve Questions
Provision for credit losses spiked to $5.0M in 2025Q1, and a recent reserve on an isolated commercial credit contributed to an EPS miss, as reported in financial statements, suggesting potential under-reserving.
The magnitude of the EPS miss ($0.66 actual vs. $0.93 estimate) relative to management's characterization of the credit reserve as isolated suggests that the market may be skeptical of the adequacy of loan loss reserves. The bank's concentration in commercial real estate within its New York footprint heightens sensitivity to regional property valuations, and the negative NIM in 2026Q2 may indicate broader stress. Investors should scrutinize the allowance for loan losses in upcoming quarters to assess whether further provisions are needed.
P/E Misleads on Earnings Power
The P/E ratio is often misapplied to banks because provisions and securities gains can distort net income; for AROW, the TTM P/E of 15.03 obscures the underlying profitability strain.
For banks, P/E is less meaningful than P/B or P/TBV because earnings are heavily influenced by credit provisions and realized securities gains/losses, which are not indicative of core earning power. AROW's forward P/E of 11.33 may appear attractive, but it relies on a recovery in earnings that may not materialize if credit costs remain elevated. A more appropriate metric is P/TBV combined with ROTCE, which better reflects the bank's ability to generate returns on tangible capital. Investors should focus on the sustainability of ROE and the adequacy of reserves rather than headline P/E.