Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.3x · EV/EBITDA 9.2x · ROE -19.0%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $594M | $1.4B | $917M | $2.6B | $2.9B | $2.0B | $5.5B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.1B | $1.9B | $1.3B | $3.0B | $3.5B | $2.4B | $5.8B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.29 | — | — | 30.00 | — | — | 91.79 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.46 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 1.62 | 1.77 | 2.39 | 6.28 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 2.26 | 5.40 | 3.17 | 4.18 | 6.83 | 12.12 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 7.44 | 17.62 | 6.25 | 11.88 | 22.13 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 5.83 | 13.82 | 5.95 | 11.01 | 20.47 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.50 | 1.37 | 1.93 | 2.16 | 2.81 | 6.64 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.22 | 15.93 | — | 11.29 | 42.59 | 1990.38 | 47.26 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 15.13 | — | — | 13.71 | 111.26 | — | 47.66 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 24.16 | 8.53 | 14.12 | 26.99 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 23.2% | 23.2% | 32.5% | 26.4% | 13.0% | 8.0% | 23.2% | 23.3% | 4.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 5.7% | -24.8% | 13.6% | -1.1% | -2.9% | 10.9% | 12.9% | -21.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -4.1% | -4.1% | -26.2% | 8.7% | 0.3% | -5.9% | 6.8% | 6.1% | -20.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -19.0% | -19.0% | -53.5% | 26.5% | 1.5% | -115.4% | 52.7% | 14.0% | -23.0% |
| ROA | -3.6% | -3.6% | -15.3% | 8.0% | 0.3% | -5.6% | 7.5% | 5.5% | -11.9% |
| ROIC | 7.9% | 7.9% | -19.8% | 14.9% | -1.7% | -4.8% | 43.1% | 26.5% | -12.1% |
| ROCE | 7.1% | 7.1% | -19.2% | 16.4% | -1.7% | -3.9% | 27.2% | 23.6% | -16.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.94 | 2.94 | 2.42 | 1.20 | 1.82 | 4.32 | — | 0.32 | 0.59 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.33 | 6.33 | — | 2.72 | 9.28 | 603.01 | 3.49 | 0.88 | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 2.00 | 1.16 | 0.79 | 1.50 | 2.13 | — | -0.70 | 0.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.31 | 4.31 | — | 1.79 | 7.67 | 297.89 | 2.61 | -1.92 | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.54 | 2.28 | 2.24 | 4.86 | — | — | -0.55 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -0.07 | -0.07 | -6.20 | 5.01 | 0.87 | -0.71 | 8.04 | 4.44 | -3.24 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.31 | 2.31 | 2.28 | 2.48 | 1.79 | 3.47 | 1.30 | 1.05 | 1.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.91 | 1.91 | 1.82 | 2.00 | 1.29 | 2.64 | 0.89 | 0.80 | 0.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.29 | 1.50 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.75 | 1.33 | 0.70 | 0.57 |
| Inventory Turnover | 6.55 | 6.55 | 3.08 | 7.17 | 6.11 | 3.82 | 5.65 | 3.36 | 5.06 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 77.19 | 109.94 | 76.90 | 94.67 | 104.82 | 56.82 | 54.58 | 77.98 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 0.6% | 0.4% | 10.8% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 3.3% | — | — | 1.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 13.4% | 5.7% | 16.0% | 8.4% | 4.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 10.8% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $153M | $152M | $152M | $150M | $130M | $127M | $127M | $127M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ARRY stock.
Array Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -5.3x. The historical average is 60.9x.
Array Technologies, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 29.3x.
Array Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -19.0%. The historical average is -14.5%.
Based on historical data, Array Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -5.3x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Array Technologies, Inc. has 23.2% gross margin and 5.7% operating margin.
Array Technologies, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.3x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Grid interconnection delays
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Recovery from Steel Volatility
Gross margin rebounded to 29.1% in 2026Q2 from an 8.6% trough in 2025Q4, per reported financials, yet net margin remains negative at -4.07% TTM, indicating persistent below-the-line drags.
The sharp gross margin recovery suggests improved steel cost pass-through and pricing power, but the swing from -64.5% net margin in 2025Q4 to +7.1% in 2026Q2 highlights the earnings volatility inherent in project-based hardware sales. Operating margin of 10.2% in 2026Q2 versus -20.5% in 2025Q4 demonstrates significant operating leverage, yet the negative TTM net margin implies non-operating charges or interest expenses continue to weigh on profitability. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin expansion can be sustained as steel prices fluctuate and whether the negative net margin is driven by non-cash impairments or debt service.
ROIC Recovery Amidst Negative Equity
ROIC swung from -15.0% in 2024Q4 to +3.3% in 2026Q2, per balance sheet data, but negative equity of -$202.1M complicates the interpretation of returns on capital.
The improvement in ROIC from deeply negative levels suggests operational recovery, but the negative equity base means ROE is distorted; ROE of 8.6% in 2026Q2 is calculated on a negative equity base, making it less meaningful. The cumulative net losses over the past ten quarters have eroded equity, yet the positive ROIC indicates that operating profits are being generated on invested capital. This divergence suggests that the company may be creating value operationally, but the balance sheet strain from accumulated losses and impairments warrants close monitoring.
Working Capital Swings Drive Cash Flow
Cash conversion cycle compressed to 86 days in 2026Q2 from 226 days in 2024Q1, per reported figures, reflecting improved receivables and inventory management, but quarterly volatility remains extreme.
The dramatic reduction in DSO from 167 days to 82 days and DIO from 158 days to 61 days indicates better working capital discipline, likely due to improved project execution and billing terms. However, the CCC has swung from 226 days to 86 days over ten quarters, highlighting the lumpy nature of project-based revenue recognition. The negative working capital swings in 2026Q1 (-$50.6M) versus positive in 2025Q4 (+$76.7M) suggest that cash flow is heavily influenced by timing of billings and collections, which investors should factor into quarterly expectations.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Turns Negative
Debt-to-equity rose to 2.54 in 2026Q2 from 1.14 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, while total equity turned negative at -$202.1M, indicating increased financial risk.
The reported D/E of 2.94% in 2025Q4 appears anomalous and contradicts the historical trend, suggesting a possible data error or accounting reclassification that warrants verification. Excluding that anomaly, the D/E has risen from 1.14 to 2.54 as equity eroded, while total debt increased modestly to $752.9M. Interest coverage improved to 5.95x in 2026Q2 from negative levels in 2025Q4, but the negative equity base means the company is technically insolvent on a book basis, though operating cash flow of $121.3M in 2026Q2 provides some cushion. Investors should monitor the company's ability to refinance or service debt given the balance sheet strain.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Adequate
Current ratio improved to 2.20 in 2026Q2 from 1.89 in 2025Q3, per quarterly data, with cash at $307.3M, providing a cushion against near-term obligations.
The current ratio has remained above 2.0 for most quarters, indicating that current assets comfortably cover current liabilities, even with inventory and receivables volatility. The quick ratio of 1.81 in 2026Q2 suggests that even without inventory, the company can meet short-term obligations, which is reassuring given the project-based nature of its business. However, the negative equity and high leverage imply that the liquidity position is dependent on continued cash generation and access to credit, which could be tested if grid interconnection delays persist.
Misapplied P/E on Negative Earnings
The P/E ratio is commonly misapplied to Array Technologies given its negative TTM net margin of -4.07%, per reported figures, obscuring the company's cash-generative hardware business.
With a TTM P/E of -7.08 and negative net income, traditional earnings multiples are meaningless, yet the forward P/E of 6.93 suggests the market expects a sharp earnings recovery. The more appropriate valuation metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 10.88x reflects the company's operating profitability before non-cash charges and interest, and is more comparable to peers like Nextracker. Additionally, P/FCF of 9.96 indicates that the market is pricing the company on its cash generation, which has been robust despite accounting losses. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF rather than P/E when assessing Array's valuation.