Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 86.7x · EV/EBITDA 58.4x · ROE 9.4%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.8B | $3.2B | $3.0B | $1.5B | $748M | $891M | $1.3B | $435M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.3B | $2.7B | $2.8B | $1.3B | $537M | $622M | $1.3B | $423M |
| P/E Ratio → | 86.67 | 92.60 | — | — | — | — | — | 146.66 |
| P/S Ratio | 6.57 | 7.59 | 9.18 | 5.50 | 3.22 | 4.64 | 8.88 | 3.75 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.23 | 6.65 | 11.19 | 6.65 | 3.08 | 3.48 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 33.79 | 39.04 | 35.33 | 48.00 | — | 346.69 | 74.35 | — |
| P/OCF | 32.33 | 37.36 | 34.12 | 43.13 | — | 177.07 | 70.37 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 6.49 | 8.35 | 4.74 | 2.31 | 3.24 | 8.42 | 3.64 |
| EV / EBITDA | 58.43 | 69.35 | 219.88 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 69.40 | 67.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 33.36 | 32.14 | 41.31 | — | 242.28 | 70.53 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.1% | 74.1% | 75.0% | 71.5% | 71.5% | 72.6% | 73.4% | 68.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 7.9% | 2.2% | -5.6% | -17.4% | -27.9% | -10.2% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.4% | 8.4% | -8.8% | -8.0% | -17.9% | -18.4% | -11.2% | 2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.4% | 9.4% | -11.7% | -9.3% | -16.7% | -28.1% | — | — |
| ROA | 5.4% | 5.4% | -6.1% | -5.1% | -10.4% | -12.6% | -12.7% | 3.0% |
| ROIC | 418.7% | 418.7% | 81.8% | -46.9% | -301.9% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | 8.1% | 8.1% | 2.6% | -5.7% | -14.7% | -30.2% | -29.2% | -65.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.44 | 0.44 | 1.32 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.97 | -1.01 | -0.93 | -0.87 | -1.05 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -11.81 | -11.81 | -21.85 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -5.68 | -3.19 | -6.69 | — | -104.41 | -3.82 | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | -840.25 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($481M) exceeds total debt ($17M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.28 | 2.28 | 1.77 | 1.84 | 2.15 | 3.01 | 1.31 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.28 | 2.28 | 1.77 | 1.84 | 2.15 | 3.01 | 1.31 | 0.85 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.76 | 1.76 | 1.30 | 1.28 | 1.61 | 2.43 | 0.76 | 0.22 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.53 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.90 | 1.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 108.35 | 96.49 | 115.31 | 104.43 | 104.73 | 116.22 | 125.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.2% | 1.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 0.7% |
| FCF Yield | 3.0% | 2.6% | 2.8% | 2.1% | — | 0.3% | 1.3% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 0.2% | 2.5% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.8% | 1.6% | 1.1% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 0.2% | 2.5% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $229M | $184M | $182M | $182M | $142M | $90M | $44M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AVPT stock.
AvePoint, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 86.7x. The historical average is 119.6x.
AvePoint, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 58.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 69.3x.
AvePoint, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.4%. The historical average is -11.3%.
Based on historical data, AvePoint, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 86.7x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AvePoint, Inc. has 74.1% gross margin and 7.9% operating margin.
AvePoint, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Microsoft Purview competitive threat
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple on AI Governance
AVPT trades at 89.9x trailing P/E and 61.0x EV/EBITDA, per recent filings, implying the market prices in sustained high growth from AI-driven governance demand.
The forward P/E of 33.4x suggests investors expect significant earnings expansion, consistent with the 26.9% revenue growth reported in Q2 2026. Compared to peers like Qualys at 34.2x P/E, AVPT's multiple appears rich, but it may be justified by its higher growth and unique position in Microsoft 365 governance. The EV/EBITDA of 61.0x is elevated, indicating the market is paying for future profitability rather than current EBITDA, which is still modest at 7.9% operating margin.
Margin Expansion at Inflection Point
Gross margin held at 73.1% in Q2 2026, while operating margin improved to 8.2% from negative levels in 2024, as reported in financial statements, signaling scale benefits.
The 74% gross margin is structurally constrained by lower-margin services and cloud hosting costs, but the operating margin's upward trajectory from -4.3% in Q1 2024 to 8.2% in Q2 2026 indicates fixed-cost leverage is taking hold. Net margin of 22.1% in Q2 2026 is inflated by non-operating interest income on the $480M cash pile, so investors should focus on operating margin as the cleaner measure of earning power. The improvement in R&D and SG&A efficiency, down to 65% of revenue from 77%, suggests management is balancing growth investments with profitability.
Volatile ROIC Reflects Transition
ROIC swung from -65.4% in Q2 2024 to 35.0% in Q2 2026, per company reports, indicating the SaaS transition is now generating returns on invested capital.
The dramatic swing in ROIC is typical of a company transitioning from a legacy license model to SaaS, where upfront investments depress returns before recurring revenue scales. The 35.0% ROIC in Q2 2026 is strong, though it is partly driven by a low capital base due to the asset-light model. ROE of 6.3% remains modest because of a large cash balance and negative retained earnings, but as the company deploys cash into growth or buybacks, ROE could improve. The trend suggests the company is compounding returns, but investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustain above 30% as the capital base grows.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
DSO fell from 97 days in Q1 2024 to 79 days in Q2 2026, as per financial data, indicating faster collections and improved working capital management.
The reduction in DSO by 18 days over the period suggests better contract terms or more efficient billing processes, which is positive for cash conversion. DPO remains low at 10 days, reflecting a services-heavy cost structure with limited supplier leverage, but this is typical for a software company. The cash conversion cycle is not fully calculable due to missing DIO, but the improving DSO and stable DPO suggest working capital is becoming less of a drag on cash flow. The asset turnover of 0.17x is low, consistent with a high-margin software model that generates revenue from a relatively small asset base.
Minimal Debt, Fortress Balance Sheet
D/E stands at 0.04 with $417M cash against $16M debt, as reported in Q2 2026, providing substantial financial flexibility and negligible refinancing risk.
Interest coverage of 9.06x in Q2 2026 is comfortable, though it is based on operating income that is still modest relative to interest income. The company's net cash position of roughly $400M means it could fund acquisitions or buybacks without taking on debt, as evidenced by the $50.5M repurchased in Q2 2026. The low leverage is a strategic advantage, allowing AvePoint to weather downturns or invest aggressively in AI-related product development. However, the D/EBITDA of 0.89x is slightly elevated due to low EBITDA, but this is not a concern given the cash pile.
Ample Liquidity Buffer
Current ratio of 2.00 and quick ratio of 2.00 in Q2 2026, per balance sheet data, indicate strong short-term solvency with no inventory dependence.
The current ratio has improved from 1.86 in Q1 2024 to 2.00, driven by cash accumulation and strong deferred revenue growth, which provides forward visibility. The quick ratio equals the current ratio because the company holds no inventory, typical for a software firm. Under a severe stress scenario, the $417M cash position would cover operating expenses for over a year, given the current burn rate. This liquidity cushion supports the company's ability to invest through economic cycles and pursue strategic M&A without external financing.
Premium vs. Data Governance Peers
AVPT's P/E of 89.9x and EV/EBITDA of 61.0x exceed Qualys and Varonis, as per market data, reflecting its higher growth and unique Microsoft ecosystem focus.
Compared to Qualys (P/E 34.2x, EV/EBITDA 27.1x) and Varonis (negative earnings), AVPT trades at a significant premium, which may be justified by its 26.9% revenue growth versus Qualys's mid-teens growth. The market appears to be pricing AVPT as a pure-play on Microsoft 365 and AI governance, which could command a higher multiple than broader security peers. However, the gap also embeds expectations for continued margin expansion; if growth decelerates, the multiple could compress. The negative ROE of Varonis highlights AVPT's relative profitability, but investors should watch whether the premium is sustainable as competition intensifies.
Misapplied P/E on Transitional Earnings
The trailing P/E of 89.9x is misleading because net income includes non-operating interest income and one-time items, as per Q2 2026 data, obscuring true operating earnings.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for AVPT is the P/E, because the company's net margin of 22.1% is inflated by interest income on its large cash balance, which is not core to its software business. Analysts should use EV/EBITDA or a P/E based on non-GAAP operating earnings to better capture the underlying profitability. Additionally, the high P/E may deter value investors, but the forward P/E of 33.4x is more reasonable, reflecting expected earnings growth. A better metric is EV/Sales or EV/EBITDA, which normalizes for capital structure and non-operating items, providing a clearer picture of valuation relative to peers.