Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 21.1x · EV/EBITDA 15.5x · ROE N/A. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $52.6B | $50.0B | $72.4B | $56.6B | $46.9B | $44.8B | $35.3B | $28.6B | $28.1B | $21.1B | $15.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $65.1B | $62.4B | $84.4B | $68.7B | $57.5B | $53.9B | $42.4B | $35.2B | $33.2B | $26.0B | $20.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 21.08 | 19.42 | 28.98 | 21.27 | 18.54 | 18.46 | 16.27 | 16.53 | 17.37 | 15.80 | 12.00 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.59 | 2.46 | 3.82 | 3.06 | 2.68 | 2.76 | 2.41 | 2.27 | 2.37 | 1.88 | 1.41 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 29.00 | 27.51 | 40.45 | 29.33 | 21.86 | 17.66 | 12.19 | 12.66 | 17.21 | 13.56 | 15.12 |
| P/OCF | 16.20 | 15.37 | 23.23 | 18.85 | 15.94 | 13.97 | 10.03 | 10.53 | 13.20 | 10.16 | 9.79 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.07 | 4.46 | 3.72 | 3.29 | 3.32 | 2.90 | 2.79 | 2.80 | 2.31 | 1.86 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.54 | 16.75 | 19.99 | 15.84 | 14.48 | 14.51 | 12.64 | 12.51 | 12.83 | 12.05 | 8.41 |
| EV / EBIT | 17.48 | 16.75 | 23.38 | 18.08 | 16.50 | 16.44 | 14.36 | 14.53 | 14.92 | 14.30 | 9.70 |
| EV / FCF | — | 34.36 | 47.16 | 35.57 | 26.83 | 21.22 | 14.62 | 15.56 | 20.32 | 16.67 | 19.88 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 52.3% | 52.3% | 52.6% | 53.1% | 52.0% | 52.1% | 52.8% | 53.6% | 53.7% | 53.2% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 18.3% | 19.1% | 20.5% | 19.9% | 20.1% | 20.1% | 19.1% | 18.7% | 16.1% | 19.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.6% | 12.6% | 13.2% | 14.4% | 14.5% | 14.9% | 14.8% | 13.7% | 13.6% | 11.9% | 11.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 12.6% | 12.6% | 13.7% | 16.1% | 16.2% | 16.3% | 15.0% | 14.3% | 16.8% | 14.4% | 14.3% |
| ROIC | 30.2% | 30.2% | 34.0% | 41.7% | 44.2% | 45.6% | 40.4% | 40.1% | 49.7% | 40.4% | 48.8% |
| ROCE | 34.9% | 34.9% | 39.5% | 47.5% | 49.1% | 47.3% | 38.5% | 38.6% | 50.9% | 41.1% | 49.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.42 | 3.42 | 2.91 | 2.85 | 2.75 | 2.50 | 2.45 | 2.95 | 2.03 | 2.35 | 2.13 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.34 | 3.34 | 2.85 | 2.78 | 2.68 | 2.43 | 2.11 | 2.33 | 1.97 | 2.25 | 2.01 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.84 | 6.71 | 6.25 | 4.97 | 3.56 | 2.44 | 2.90 | 3.12 | 3.11 | 4.76 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.88 | 7.88 | 7.42 | 8.25 | 11.04 | 16.88 | 14.97 | 11.86 | 11.70 | 10.21 | 13.37 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 0.87 | 1.08 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.97 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.37 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.94 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.06 | 1.01 | 0.88 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1.18 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.25 | 1.25 | 1.28 | 1.41 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 1.49 | 1.31 | 1.27 | 1.33 | 1.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 13.55 | 12.92 | 10.77 | 10.88 | 11.34 | 9.44 | 10.54 | 9.51 | 8.40 | 9.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.7% | 5.2% | 3.5% | 4.7% | 5.4% | 5.4% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 5.8% | 6.3% | 8.3% |
| FCF Yield | 3.4% | 3.6% | 2.5% | 3.4% | 4.6% | 5.7% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 5.8% | 7.4% | 6.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 3.8% | 4.0% | 2.2% | 5.5% | 7.9% | 9.7% | 9.6% | 3.2% | 7.1% | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.8% | 4.0% | 2.2% | 5.5% | 7.9% | 9.7% | 9.6% | 3.2% | 7.1% | 7.5% | 7.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $17M | $17M | $18M | $19M | $21M | $23M | $24M | $25M | $27M | $29M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying AZO stock.
AutoZone, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 21.1x. The historical average is 17.0x. This places it at the 87th percentile of its historical range.
AutoZone, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 11.0x.
Based on historical data, AutoZone, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 21.1x. This is at the 87th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
AutoZone, Inc. has 52.3% gross margin and 18.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
AutoZone, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Mix shift margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Pricing for Predictable Cash Flow
AutoZone trades at a forward P/E of 19.07 and EV/EBITDA of 13.53, a significant discount to O'Reilly's multiples but a premium to struggling peer Advance Auto, suggesting the market rewards its cash flow stability and capital return model over raw growth.
The company's PEG ratio of 1.32 indicates its valuation premium is partially justified by steady, if unspectacular, earnings growth. Compared to a sector often driven by cyclical sentiment, AutoZone's multiples reflect a defensive earnings profile rooted in needs-based demand. However, the valuation does not appear to fully price in the structural margin headwinds from the ongoing Commercial segment mix shift identified in the income statement analysis.
Margin Resilience Eroded by SG&A Burden
Despite maintaining a robust 53.3% gross margin in 2026Q4, AutoZone's operating margin of 20.0% sits below its 21.3% peak, a decline driven not by product costs but by SG&A growth that consumed a larger share of revenue.
The stability of the gross margin suggests the Duralast private label and pricing power remain intact. The compression in operating margin, however, indicates that selling, general, and administrative expenses—particularly labor and distribution—are the primary constraint on profitability. This trend implies that without a reversal in SG&A leverage, further operating margin expansion appears unlikely in the near term.
ROIC Decline Signals Capital Efficiency Pressure
According to recent financial data, AutoZone's ROIC has trended downward from 13.4% in 2024Q4 to 10.5% in 2026Q4, a decay that suggests the company's aggressive capital return program may be diluting returns faster than core operations can compound them.
The driver of this decline appears to be falling net margins rather than asset turnover, which has remained relatively stable. This pattern indicates that profitability headwinds are the key risk to the company's long-term capital compounding. The current ROIC remains well above its estimated cost of capital, but the trajectory warrants monitoring.
Serviceable Debt Burden Masked by Accounting
Based on reported interest coverage of 8.86x in 2026Q4, AutoZone's debt service remains comfortable, yet the persistent negative stockholders' equity from buybacks makes traditional leverage ratios uncalculable and understates the balance sheet's financial risk.
The company's leverage is sustained by an asset-backed model and strong cash flow, allowing it to support a high debt load. However, the absence of an equity cushion means refinancing risk during a severe credit contraction could be more acute than standard ratios suggest. The negative working capital cycle further complicates the view, as it effectively finances a portion of operations through supplier credit.
Negative Working Capital as a Strategic Tool
The current ratio of 0.90 and quick ratio of 0.14 appear shallow on the surface, but as reported in financial statements, they reflect a deliberate negative cash conversion cycle where inventory is financed through vendor terms, not cash reserves.
This structure is a source of efficiency, freeing up capital for share repurchases. However, it creates a dependency on continuous, favorable supplier relationships. Any disruption to vendor terms or a sudden demand for liquidity could rapidly strain the position, as the company maintains minimal liquid assets relative to its near-term obligations.
The Misleading Metric of Return on Equity
The most commonly misapplied ratio for AutoZone is Return on Equity (ROE), which is rendered meaningless—and often highly volatile or infinite—due to the company's structural negative equity from perpetual share repurchases.
Focusing on ROE creates a distorted view of performance, as it can swing wildly based on minor changes in book value and does not reflect the true return on the company's invested capital. Analysts should instead use ROIC or cash-based return metrics like Cash Return on Invested Capital (CROIC), which properly measure how effectively management is deploying capital into the business, independent of its financing decisions.