Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -5.9x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -96.7%. (2019–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.1B | $1.9B | $1.0B | $319M | $86M | $606M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.0B | $1.9B | $1.1B | $487M | $274M | $731M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -5.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 7.49 | 15.18 | 6.57 | 2.06 | 0.55 | 4.16 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.30 | 3.17 | — | — | — | 4.95 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 14.68 | 7.18 | 3.14 | 1.77 | 5.02 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | 22.3% | 28.6% | 26.2% | 27.7% | 23.4% | 23.7% | 23.8% |
| Operating Margin | -65.3% | -65.3% | -84.3% | -25.2% | -71.3% | -53.9% | -5.0% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -230.2% | -230.2% | -186.8% | -45.5% | -71.8% | -84.9% | -2.8% | 8.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -96.7% | -96.7% | — | — | -263.6% | -110.9% | -4.5% | 53.5% |
| ROA | -47.5% | -47.5% | -108.7% | -35.8% | -38.5% | -41.1% | -2.2% | 39.2% |
| ROIC | -19.5% | -19.5% | -103.6% | -23.4% | -41.7% | -26.4% | -3.3% | 47.7% |
| ROCE | -19.6% | -19.6% | -98.1% | -26.8% | -46.7% | -30.2% | -4.2% | 54.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.04 | 0.04 | — | — | — | 1.59 | 1.07 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | 1.03 | 0.97 | -0.14 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.26 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 105.52 | -0.40 |
| Interest Coverage | -15.22 | -15.22 | -10.53 | -2.13 | -3.87 | -14.78 | — | 50.25 |
Net cash position: cash ($87M) exceeds total debt ($24M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.78 | 1.78 | 0.46 | 0.93 | 1.52 | 2.94 | 2.85 | 3.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.78 | 1.78 | 0.46 | 0.93 | 1.52 | 1.50 | 2.85 | 3.70 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 0.98 | 0.80 | 0.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.46 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 4.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | 1.10 | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 64.91 | 91.92 | 62.97 | 73.94 | 73.29 | 95.93 | 68.40 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.8% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $359M | $234M | $149M | $128M | $107M | $105M | $105M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 7 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BBAI stock.
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -5.9x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -96.7%. The historical average is -84.4%.
Based on historical data, BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -5.9x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. has 22.3% gross margin and -65.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Software Premium Unsupported by Services Economics
Based on the reported P/S multiple of 8.34 and a P/E of -2.71, BBAI is priced on revenue rather than earnings, which appears generous given a 22.31% gross margin and a revenue decline of 19.32%. The market is therefore pricing a growth profile the current fundamentals do not show.
A P/E of -2.71 reflects negative earnings, so the investable signal sits in the sales multiple, where BBAI trades at 8.34x against services-oriented peers that typically command far lower revenue multiples. Paying a software-style multiple for a labor-intensive cost structure implies the market expects margin expansion that has not yet appeared in reported results. Investors should monitor whether Analytics segment revenue can lift gross margin before the multiple is justified on fundamentals rather than narrative.
Operating Losses Overwhelm Gross Margin Stability
As reported in the quarterly statements, BBAI's gross margin has held within a 20% to 37% band, yet operating margin has ranged from roughly -19% to -89%, showing overhead and R&D consume far more than gross profit generates. The gap is structural rather than cyclical in the reported window.
Gross margin oscillation between 20.3% and 37.4% is consistent with a services mix whose pricing and labor utilization vary by contract, but the persistent operating deficit indicates fixed costs are not scaling with revenue. Net margin is further distorted by non-operating swings, including a -178.3% quarter in 2025Q1 that diverges sharply from operating results. Net margin therefore understates the consistency of the operating problem and should be read alongside operating margin rather than in isolation.
Returns Eroded by Accumulated Deficit
Based on EDBL's reported figures, ROIC has been negative in every quarter shown, ranging from -2.7% to -14.0%, and ROE has swung between -98.5% and +0.6%, indicating the company has not compounded invested capital in the window.
ROIC staying negative across all ten quarters suggests capital deployed, including roughly $229M of 2025Q4 acquisition outflows, has not yet generated returns above the cost of capital. The volatility in ROE is largely a function of equity base changes and non-cash items rather than a steady earnings trend. Returns would need sustained positive operating income to turn compounding, which the reported figures do not yet support.
Liquidity Strong on Paper, Burn-Dependent in Practice
According to recent SEC filings, BBAI's current ratio has ranged from 0.46 to 6.08, with the latest reading near 4.92, but this headline liquidity sits against negative operating cash flow in nine of ten quarters. The buffer is therefore being consumed rather than replenished.
A current ratio near 4.92 looks comfortable, yet the cash buffer, which moved from $50.1M to $456.6M and back to $77.1M, reflects financing and acquisition timing more than organic cash generation. Under a severe stress scenario, with continued quarterly burn and no revenue recovery, the current cushion would erode relatively quickly. Investors should treat the liquidity position as dependent on the company's ability to sustain access to capital.
Debt-Free Headline Masks Deficit Base
As reported in the filings, the low D/E ratio of 0.03 looks favorable, but retained earnings near -$1.0B suggest the equity base was built mainly from capital contributions rather than profitable operations. Leverage metrics alone may overstate balance sheet strength.
The favorable debt metrics are real in the reported data, yet they do not capture the economic cost of the equity raised to fund losses, which has diluted the per-share economics. Leverage is low partly because debt was retired rather than because earnings have accumulated. The most commonly misapplied metric here is D/E, which can look strong for a company whose equity itself is a product of ongoing funding, and a cash-burn-adjusted coverage measure would give a more accurate picture of resilience.