Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.3x · EV/EBITDA 7.9x · ROE 55.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.3B | $4.9B | $4.2B | $4.1B | $2.6B | $3.3B | $3.7B | $4.6B | $3.3B | $4.0B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise Value | $7.0B | $7.6B | $7.0B | $6.8B | $5.3B | $5.9B | $5.9B | $6.3B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $2.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.33 | 24.84 | 25.56 | 47.03 | 15.04 | 31.22 | 160.00 | 159.09 | — | 245.94 | 60.66 |
| P/S Ratio | 0.82 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.57 | 0.78 | 0.99 | 1.26 | 0.94 | 1.19 | 0.69 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.85 | 12.07 | 13.30 | 7.93 | 4.50 | 13.00 | 18.06 | 22.32 | 18.33 | 11.07 | 5.88 |
| P/FCF | 9.90 | 11.26 | 20.42 | 8.25 | 8.64 | 10.59 | 18.36 | 22.74 | 15.74 | 51.22 | 37.74 |
| P/OCF | 6.76 | 7.68 | 9.76 | 5.87 | 5.35 | 6.87 | 11.51 | 12.57 | 9.04 | 15.76 | 12.46 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.44 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 1.59 | 1.70 | 1.29 | 1.37 | 0.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.94 | 8.61 | 9.40 | 9.74 | 8.77 | 9.86 | 13.96 | 14.83 | 10.30 | 10.93 | 8.51 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.86 | 12.64 | 13.98 | 15.53 | 14.58 | 16.86 | 32.47 | 29.91 | 41.22 | 21.35 | 16.14 |
| EV / FCF | — | 17.36 | 34.47 | 13.66 | 17.90 | 18.90 | 29.45 | 30.67 | 21.54 | 59.24 | 42.44 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.8% | 25.8% | 25.3% | 24.0% | 23.7% | 23.0% | 22.0% | 23.1% | 22.5% | 22.1% | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 11.2% | 9.0% | 8.7% | 8.0% | 8.4% | 5.8% | 6.4% | 7.9% | 8.2% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 3.8% | 2.5% | 0.4% | 0.8% | -1.0% | 0.5% | 1.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 55.5% | 55.5% | 39.1% | 16.1% | 41.5% | 46.2% | 7.8% | 15.0% | -12.4% | 4.7% | 10.1% |
| ROA | 2.9% | 2.9% | 2.5% | 1.4% | 2.9% | 2.0% | 0.4% | 0.8% | -1.1% | 0.7% | 1.8% |
| ROIC | 14.2% | 14.2% | 10.6% | 9.7% | 8.8% | 10.2% | 7.6% | 11.0% | 17.4% | 25.7% | 18.4% |
| ROCE | 11.9% | 11.9% | 9.7% | 9.1% | 8.2% | 8.9% | 6.5% | 8.9% | 11.1% | 15.1% | 11.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 12.10 | 12.10 | 13.61 | 7.45 | 6.54 | 13.01 | 13.98 | 9.29 | 8.66 | 3.44 | 1.25 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.60 | 5.60 | 5.70 | 5.53 | 6.14 | 5.53 | 6.73 | 4.57 | 3.56 | 2.94 | 1.61 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 6.53 | 9.14 | 5.19 | 4.83 | 10.20 | 10.91 | 7.79 | 6.74 | 1.73 | 0.73 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.03 | 3.03 | 3.83 | 3.85 | 4.54 | 4.33 | 5.26 | 3.84 | 2.77 | 1.48 | 0.94 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.10 | 14.04 | 5.40 | 9.27 | 8.31 | 11.09 | 7.93 | 5.79 | 8.02 | 4.70 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.44 | 2.44 | 2.13 | 2.16 | 2.63 | 3.10 | 1.78 | 2.24 | 1.64 | 6.37 | 7.13 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.52 | 1.43 | 1.55 | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 1.90 | 1.12 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.43 | 1.55 | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.23 | 1.38 | 1.89 | 1.10 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.03 | 1.03 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 0.46 | 0.31 | 0.51 | 0.93 | 0.24 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.51 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 154.04 | — | — | — | — | — | 466.09 | 543.38 | 222.46 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 55.58 | 54.65 | 59.63 | 71.50 | 62.59 | 69.48 | 65.53 | 63.77 | 71.27 | 62.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.0% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.1% | 0.8% | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 21.2% | 21.2% | 25.7% | 45.2% | 22.0% | 35.4% | 188.1% | 103.1% | — | 165.9% | 57.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 2.1% | 6.6% | 3.2% | 0.6% | 0.6% | — | 0.4% | 1.6% |
| FCF Yield | 10.1% | 8.9% | 4.9% | 12.1% | 11.6% | 9.4% | 5.4% | 4.4% | 6.4% | 2.0% | 2.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 4.8% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 4.1% | 2.0% | 6.1% | 1.4% | 0.2% | 2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.8% | 5.1% | 5.9% | 5.1% | 3.5% | 7.2% | 2.2% | 0.8% | 3.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $45M | $47M | $48M | $50M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $51M | $51M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BCO stock.
The Brink's Company's current P/E ratio is 22.3x. The historical average is 37.2x. This places it at the 44th percentile of its historical range.
The Brink's Company's current EV/EBITDA is 7.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 7.8x.
The Brink's Company's return on equity (ROE) is 55.5%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 16.2%.
Based on historical data, The Brink's Company is trading at a P/E of 22.3x. This is at the 44th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Brink's Company's current dividend yield is 0.96% with a payout ratio of 21.2%.
The Brink's Company has 25.8% gross margin and 11.2% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
The Brink's Company's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and FX exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value Discount on Forward Earnings
BCO trades at 12.45x forward earnings versus 24.37x trailing, implying the market expects a sharp earnings rebound. According to recent filings, the PEG of 0.41 suggests growth is underpriced relative to peers.
The steep drop from trailing to forward P/E indicates the market is pricing in a normalization of earnings power, likely driven by the digital services pivot. At 8.39x EV/EBITDA, BCO trades at a significant discount to Cintas (26.52x) and Allegion (16.25x), suggesting the market still values it as a low-growth logistics firm rather than a tech-enabled services provider. The 0.41 PEG, based on expected growth, implies the market is not crediting the acceleration in organic revenue growth, which may present an opportunity if the digital transition sustains.
Margin Expansion Hinges on Mix Shift
Gross margin improved to 26.3% in 2026Q2 from 24.9% a year earlier, per financial statements, while operating margin rose to 9.6% from 7.5%. Net margin remains thin at 3.2%, reflecting high interest costs.
The sequential improvement in gross margin suggests the mix shift toward ATM managed services and digital cash management is gaining traction, as these services carry higher incremental margins than traditional cash-in-transit. Operating margin expansion of 210 basis points year-over-year indicates operating leverage is emerging, but the 3.2% net margin is compressed by interest expense, which consumed a significant portion of operating income. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin trajectory can offset the drag from leverage and FX translation losses in hyperinflationary markets.
ROIC Trapped by Thin Asset Base
ROIC has hovered between 2.4% and 4.5% over the past ten quarters, per reported data, while ROE swung from 6.8% to 16.9%. The low ROIC reflects a heavy asset base and modest net margins.
Despite improving operating margins, ROIC remains below the cost of capital, suggesting that the company is not yet generating economic value added. The gap between ROE (10.6% in 2026Q2) and ROIC (3.5%) is driven by high leverage, which amplifies equity returns but also increases financial risk. The stability of ROIC around 3% indicates that capital efficiency is not improving, even as revenue grows, implying that the digital pivot has not yet translated into higher returns on invested capital. This may be due to the capital intensity of the legacy cash logistics business and the time lag between M&A investments and margin realization.
Working Capital Swings Mask Efficiency Gains
DSO improved to 56 days in 2026Q2 from 62 days in 2024Q2, per quarterly filings, while DPO rose to 28 days. However, the cash conversion cycle is volatile, with FCF margins swinging from -9.8% to 23.6%.
The improvement in DSO suggests better collections discipline, but the lack of DIO data (inventory is minimal) indicates that working capital is dominated by receivables and payables. The wide swings in FCF margin, from -9.8% in 2024Q2 to 23.6% in 2025Q4, highlight the lumpy nature of cash flows, which may be driven by timing of large contracts or fuel surcharge pass-throughs. Asset turnover has remained flat at 0.19x, indicating that the company is not generating more revenue per dollar of assets, which is concerning given the shift to less capital-intensive digital services. Investors should watch whether the DSO improvement is sustainable or a result of one-off collections.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Equity Thins
Debt-to-equity rose to 9.59 in 2026Q2 from 7.41 in 2024Q1, per balance sheet data, while interest coverage fell to 2.16x. The thin equity base of $310.5M amplifies the risk of further leverage.
The rising D/E ratio, combined with a declining equity base due to buybacks and retained earnings erosion, suggests that BCO is becoming more financially leveraged. Interest coverage of 2.16x in 2026Q2 is below the 2.5x typically considered comfortable, indicating that a 100 basis point rise in interest rates could significantly pressure earnings. The D/EBITDA ratio of 19.97x is elevated, though this may be distorted by the low EBITDA base; still, it underscores the company's sensitivity to credit conditions. Given the high leverage and thin net margin, any deterioration in operating cash flow could strain debt service capabilities.
Liquidity Adequate but Relies on Debt
Current ratio improved to 1.62 in 2026Q2 from 1.46 in 2024Q1, per financial statements, with cash of $1.7B. However, the quick ratio equals the current ratio, indicating minimal inventory reliance.
The current ratio of 1.62 suggests a reasonable short-term liquidity buffer, but the reliance on debt for funding is evident given the high leverage. The quick ratio being identical to the current ratio indicates that inventory is negligible, which is typical for a service business. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a sharp economic downturn or a currency crisis in Latin America, the liquidity position could deteriorate quickly if collections slow and debt markets tighten. The $1.7B cash balance provides some cushion, but it is offset by $4.2B in total debt, leaving a net debt position that could constrain flexibility.
Trading at a Discount to Security Peers
BCO's forward P/E of 12.45x is well below Cintas (40.88x) and Allegion (22.37x), per peer data, while its EV/EBITDA of 8.39x is less than half of Cintas's 26.52x. This gap may reflect perceived obsolescence risk.
The valuation discount to peers like Cintas and Allegion suggests the market is pricing in a secular decline in cash usage, but it may be overlooking BCO's growing digital services and ATM management business. Compared to ABM Industries, which trades at 18.58x P/E, BCO's forward multiple is still lower, indicating that the market is not giving credit for its accelerating growth. The gap in ROIC (BCO at 3.5% vs. Cintas at 26.7%) is structural, given the capital intensity of cash logistics, but if the digital pivot improves returns, the discount could narrow. Investors should monitor whether BCO can close the profitability gap with its higher-margin peers.
Misapplied P/E on Cyclical Earnings
The trailing P/E of 24.37x is misleading because BCO's earnings are volatile due to FX and one-time items, per reported data. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 8.39x better captures the cash-generating core.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for BCO is the P/E ratio, as its net income is heavily distorted by currency translation losses, restructuring charges, and acquisition-related costs. The trailing P/E of 24.37x overstates the cost of the stock because it is based on depressed earnings, while the forward P/E of 12.45x may understate risk if the earnings rebound does not materialize. Instead, EV/EBITDA is more reliable because it normalizes for capital structure and non-cash charges, and at 8.39x, it suggests the market is pricing BCO at a reasonable multiple of its operating cash flow. Investors should also consider P/FCF of 10.81x, which reflects the lumpy but real cash generation, and adjust for the recurring nature of restructuring costs that are excluded from adjusted EBITDA.