Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.6x · EV/EBITDA 9.0x · ROE 61.6%. (2012–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $1.9B | $1.6B | $689M | $259M | $566M | $329M | $515M | $701M | $512M | $311M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.6B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $742M | $423M | $775M | $467M | $633M | $783M | $601M | $411M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.57 | 14.94 | 15.18 | 28.85 | — | — | 36.85 | 21.15 | 22.69 | 27.84 | 104.36 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.21 | 1.29 | 1.19 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.83 | 0.37 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.33 |
| P/B Ratio | 7.28 | 7.46 | 10.02 | 17.22 | 187.43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 11.67 | 12.43 | 16.69 | 6.18 | — | — | — | 25.49 | 43.19 | 13.35 | 20.06 |
| P/OCF | 10.15 | 10.81 | 14.39 | 5.74 | — | — | 95.22 | 9.24 | 14.50 | 10.76 | 12.40 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.19 | 1.16 | 0.65 | 0.53 | 1.13 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.03 | 9.67 | 10.17 | 10.97 | — | 38.82 | 12.84 | 11.67 | 17.75 | 8.88 | 11.85 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.87 | 9.99 | 11.40 | 16.93 | — | 100.63 | 20.54 | 14.89 | 23.35 | 13.48 | 15.67 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.52 | 16.36 | 6.66 | — | — | — | 31.34 | 48.23 | 15.66 | 26.49 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.5% | 20.5% | 19.0% | 12.3% | 4.6% | 10.5% | 10.9% | 13.1% | 11.9% | 12.9% | 13.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 11.3% | 10.3% | 4.6% | -5.1% | 1.0% | 2.5% | 4.3% | 3.4% | 6.0% | 2.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 8.6% | 8.6% | 7.8% | 2.1% | -5.7% | -0.0% | 1.4% | 2.4% | 3.0% | 2.9% | 0.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 61.6% | 61.6% | 105.8% | 115.1% | -3311.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROA | 22.2% | 22.2% | 22.4% | 6.1% | -12.7% | -0.1% | 3.6% | 7.2% | 10.2% | 10.0% | 2.5% |
| ROIC | 102.6% | 102.6% | 94.7% | 30.0% | -17.9% | 3.7% | 24.5% | 63.4% | 62.9% | 208.0% | 147.5% |
| ROCE | 49.4% | 49.4% | 58.4% | 26.5% | -18.8% | 3.0% | 11.0% | 24.7% | 22.2% | 39.1% | 18.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 3.30 | 126.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.62 | 1.95 | — | 11.06 | 5.01 | 3.49 | 3.22 | 2.23 | 4.38 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.54 | -0.20 | 1.32 | 118.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.76 | -0.76 | -0.21 | 0.78 | — | 10.47 | 3.79 | 2.18 | 1.86 | 1.31 | 2.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.91 | -0.33 | 0.48 | — | — | — | 5.84 | 5.04 | 2.31 | 6.43 |
| Interest Coverage | 24.54 | 24.54 | 13.00 | 2.43 | -2.62 | 0.80 | 1.86 | 3.30 | 5.03 | 6.15 | 1.60 |
Net cash position: cash ($229M) exceeds total debt ($90M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.74 | 1.74 | 1.37 | 1.03 | 1.06 | 1.25 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.16 | 1.07 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.83 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.66 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.54 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.40 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.37 | 2.57 | 2.71 | 2.19 | 1.92 | 2.77 | 2.79 | 3.33 | 3.35 | 3.35 |
| Inventory Turnover | 8.44 | 8.44 | 8.54 | 7.35 | 5.34 | 4.89 | 13.85 | 11.23 | 15.75 | 11.34 | 14.92 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 5.09 | 16.01 | 4.05 | 5.71 | 5.32 | 3.16 | 3.77 | 8.57 | 3.74 | 7.96 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.9% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 3.5% | — | — | 2.7% | 4.7% | 4.4% | 3.6% | 1.0% |
| FCF Yield | 8.6% | 8.0% | 6.0% | 16.2% | — | — | — | 3.9% | 2.3% | 7.5% | 5.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.8% | 2.6% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 9.8% | 3.8% | 6.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.8% | 2.6% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 9.8% | 4.1% | 7.5% | 0.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $33M | $33M | $32M | $31M | $27M | $27M | $27M | $29M | $25M | $21M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BLBD stock.
Blue Bird Corporation's current P/E ratio is 14.6x. The historical average is 32.1x.
Blue Bird Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 9.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.1x.
Blue Bird Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 61.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 61.7%.
Based on historical data, Blue Bird Corporation is trading at a P/E of 14.6x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Blue Bird Corporation has 20.5% gross margin and 11.3% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Blue Bird Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.5x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Subsidy cliff and tariff exposure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion on Mix Shift
Gross margin improved to 20.0% in 2026Q3 from 17.0% in 2024Q4, while operating margin reached 12.1%, as reported in financial statements, indicating pricing power and favorable product mix.
The sequential improvement in operating margin from 11.1% to 12.1% in 2026Q3 suggests operating leverage is amplifying the benefit of higher-margin alternative fuel and electric bus sales. However, the net margin of 35.8% in 2026Q3 is distorted by a one-time tax benefit, so investors should focus on pre-tax operating margins to gauge sustainable earning power. The trend of expanding gross margins from 17.0% to 20.0% over eight quarters indicates that the company is successfully passing through input costs and benefiting from a richer mix, which may be sustainable if the EV and propane adoption rates continue to rise.
ROIC Volatility Masks Underlying Strength
ROIC swung from 12.3% in 2026Q3 to 25.6% in 2026Q2, as per quarterly data, reflecting timing effects and a one-time tax gain, but the 10-quarter average suggests mid-20s returns.
The extreme quarterly volatility in ROIC, ranging from 12.3% to 29.4%, is largely attributable to the timing of earnings recognition and the one-time tax benefit in 2026Q3. Excluding that quarter, ROIC has consistently exceeded 20% since 2025Q1, indicating that the core business is generating strong returns on invested capital. The recent goodwill addition of $264.1M in 2026Q3 may temporarily depress ROIC, but if the acquisition enhances earnings power, returns could recover. The improvement in asset turnover from 0.56 to 0.68 in 2025Q4 suggests efficiency gains, though the latest quarter's dip to 0.56 warrants monitoring.
Working Capital Efficiency Improves
Cash conversion cycle compressed to 22 days in 2026Q3 from 13 days in 2024Q4, as reported in financial statements, driven by faster receivables collection and lower inventory days.
The reduction in DSO from 12 days in 2024Q4 to 6 days in 2026Q3 indicates improved receivables management, likely due to a higher proportion of government-funded orders with prompt payment terms. DIO has remained relatively stable around 46-49 days, but the extension of DPO from 41 to 33 days in 2026Q3 suggests the company is paying suppliers faster, possibly to secure favorable pricing or due to improved liquidity. The overall CCC of 22 days is still low, reflecting a business that requires minimal working capital investment, which supports strong cash conversion. However, the seasonal nature of school bus deliveries may cause quarterly fluctuations, so investors should assess the trend over a full year.
Leverage Collapses to Near-Zero
Debt-to-equity plummeted from 0.93 in 2024Q2 to 0.18 in 2026Q3, with total debt of $115.8M fully offset by cash, as per balance sheet data, indicating a fortress balance sheet.
The dramatic deleveraging, with D/E falling from 0.93 to 0.18 in just six quarters, reflects both debt repayment and a surge in equity from retained earnings. Interest coverage turned negative in 2026Q3 due to the one-time tax benefit inflating net income, but on an operating basis, coverage remains comfortable, with EBIT comfortably covering interest expense. The near-zero leverage provides significant financial flexibility, but investors should consider whether the company is under-leveraged and could optimize capital structure to enhance shareholder returns. The recent acquisition and goodwill addition suggest management is deploying capital strategically, but the low debt levels may indicate a conservative approach that could limit growth if not balanced with investment.
Liquidity Buffer Remains Robust
Current ratio improved to 1.64 in 2026Q3 from 1.23 in 2024Q2, with cash of $116.8M, as reported in financial statements, though quick ratio of 0.67 indicates inventory dependence.
The current ratio of 1.64 suggests adequate short-term liquidity, but the quick ratio of 0.67 reveals that a significant portion of current assets is tied up in inventory, which may be less liquid in a downturn. The cash balance of $116.8M, while down from $275.9M in 2026Q2, still provides a substantial buffer against operational disruptions. The company's ability to generate positive free cash flow, with a 4.2% margin in 2026Q3, supports ongoing liquidity, but the reliance on inventory and the seasonal nature of sales could strain liquidity if demand unexpectedly weakens. Investors should monitor the quick ratio, as a sustained decline below 0.5 could signal inventory management issues.
Misapplied P/E on Distorted Earnings
The trailing P/E of 16.67 is misleading due to a one-time tax benefit in 2026Q3, as reported in financial statements, which inflated net income and understated the true earnings multiple.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for Blue Bird is the P/E, because the 2026Q3 net income includes a substantial one-time tax benefit that is not indicative of ongoing earning power. Using the reported P/E of 16.67 would understate the valuation, as normalized earnings would be lower, making the stock appear cheaper than it is. Instead, investors should use EV/EBITDA, which at 10.44 (or 3.96 forward) provides a cleaner comparison of operating value, or adjust net income to exclude non-recurring items. The forward P/E of 13.81 may be more reliable if it reflects normalized earnings, but the magnitude of the EPS beat ($5.27 vs. $0.87 estimate) suggests that consensus estimates may not yet capture the full earnings power, so a forward P/E based on management's raised guidance could be more appropriate.