Revenue growth moderated to 5.5% in 2026Q3 from a 7.7% peak in 2025Q4, while NOI margin printed an anomalous 87.1% versus a stable 73.8%-76.8% band across the eight prior quarters, distorting underlying property economics.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) annual income statement — 15-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 | Dec'11 |
|---|
| Revenue | 1.42B | 1.37B | 1.29B | 1.25B | 1.22B | 1.15B | 1.05B | 1.17B | 1.23B | 1.28B | 1.28B | 1.27B | 1.24B | 1.17B | 1.13B | 1.11B |
| Revenue Growth % | 5.65% | 6.73% | 3.21% | 2.21% | 5.71% | 9.4% | -9.84% | -5.35% | -3.81% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 2.38% | 5.27% | 4.34% | 1.12% | - |
| Property Operating Expenses | 562.07M | 340.52M | 317.12M | 319.99M | 311.79M | 297.79M | 280.62M | 295.86M | 313.62M | 315.19M | 307.92M | 310.39M | 308.65M | 295.9M | 287.57M | 288.26M |
| Net Operating Income (NOI) | 860.3M | 1.03B | 967.94M | 925.05M | 906.28M | 854.49M | 772.64M | 872.39M | 920.72M | 967.99M | 967.86M | 955.59M | 927.95M | 878.8M | 838.22M | 825.12M |
| NOI Margin % | 60.48% | 75.17% | 75.32% | 74.3% | 74.4% | 74.16% | 73.36% | 74.67% | 74.59% | 75.44% | 75.86% | 75.48% | 75.04% | 74.81% | 74.46% | 74.11% |
| Operating Expenses | 332.94M | 527.6M | 497.76M | 117.13M | 461.96M | 432.61M | 98.28M | 102.31M | 455.92M | 472.6M | 488.73M | 525.93M | 533.34M | 580.7M | 605.31M | 594.2M |
| G&A Expenses | 111.98M | 112.67M | 116.36M | 117.13M | 117.22M | 105.45M | 98.28M | 102.31M | 93.6M | 92.25M | 92.25M | 98.45M | 80.17M | 121.09M | 88.87M | 107.87M |
| EBITDA | 952.07M | 918.41M | 851.58M | 1.17B | 789.06M | 749.03M | 993.45M | 1.08B | 817.04M | 614.13M | 602.02M | 554.83M | 528.49M | 697.01M | 692.46M | 646.94M |
| EBITDA Margin % | 66.94% | 66.96% | 66.27% | 93.99% | 64.78% | 65% | 94.32% | 92.76% | 66.19% | 47.86% | 47.19% | 43.83% | 42.74% | 59.33% | 61.51% | 58.11% |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 424.71M | 414.93M | 381.4M | 362.28M | 344.73M | 327.15M | 319.09M | 313.61M | 352.25M | 345.39M | 349.57M | 370.18M | 396.7M | 398.9M | 459.55M | 416.02M |
| D&A / Revenue % | 29.86% | 30.25% | 29.68% | 29.1% | 28.3% | 28.39% | 30.3% | 26.84% | 28.54% | 26.92% | 27.4% | 29.24% | 32.08% | 33.96% | 40.82% | 37.37% |
| Operating Income | 527.36M | 503.48M | 470.18M | 807.92M | 444.33M | 421.88M | 674.37M | 770.09M | 464.8M | 268.73M | 252.45M | 184.65M | 131.79M | 298.11M | 232.91M | 230.92M |
| Operating Margin % | 37.08% | 36.71% | 36.59% | 64.89% | 36.48% | 36.61% | 64.03% | 65.92% | 37.66% | 20.94% | 19.79% | 14.59% | 10.66% | 25.38% | 20.69% | 20.74% |
| Interest Expense | 4M | 224.69M | 215.99M | 190.73M | 192.43M | 194.78M | 199.99M | 189.78M | 215.03M | 226.66M | 226.67M | 245.01M | 262.81M | 348M | 386.38M | 394.35M |
| Interest Coverage | - | 2.72x | 2.57x | 2.60x | 2.84x | 2.39x | 1.69x | 2.31x | 2.70x | 2.19x | 2.28x | 1.95x | 1.43x | 0.86x | 0.59x | 1.30x |
| Non-Operating Income | -133.37M | -107.46M | -85.09M | 312.1M | -102.29M | -43.08M | 335.58M | 332.43M | -116.51M | 0 | -37.73M | -47.76M | 19.02M | 0 | 6.71M | -281.12M |
| Pretax Income | 426.69M | 386.25M | 339.28M | 305.09M | 354.19M | 270.19M | 121.17M | 274.77M | 366.28M | 300.37M | 278.14M | 197.54M | 112.77M | -100.83M | -152.51M | 117.69M |
| Pretax Margin % | 30% | 28.16% | 26.4% | 24.5% | 29.08% | 23.45% | 11.5% | 23.52% | 29.67% | 23.41% | 21.8% | 15.6% | 9.12% | -8.58% | -13.55% | 10.57% |
| Income Tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 224.21M | 224.71M | 296.7M | 323.45M | 359.26M | 401.65M | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 74.64% | 80.79% | 150.2% | 286.82% | -356.31% | -263.37% | 0% |
| Net Income | 426.28M | 386.23M | 339.27M | 305.09M | 354.19M | 270.19M | 121.17M | 274.77M | 366.28M | 300.29M | 275.63M | 193.72M | 89M | -93.53M | -122.57M | 67.51M |
| Net Margin % | 29.97% | 28.16% | 26.4% | 24.5% | 29.08% | 23.45% | 11.5% | 23.52% | 29.67% | 23.4% | 21.6% | 15.3% | 7.2% | -7.96% | -10.89% | 6.06% |
| Net Income Growth % | 28.2% | 13.84% | 11.21% | -13.86% | 31.09% | 122.98% | -55.9% | -24.98% | 21.98% | 8.95% | 42.28% | 117.66% | 195.15% | 23.69% | -281.56% | - |
| Funds From Operations (FFO) | 850.99M | 801.16M | 720.67M | 667.36M | 698.92M | 597.34M | 440.26M | 588.38M | 718.53M | 645.69M | 625.2M | 563.9M | 485.7M | 305.37M | 336.99M | 483.53M |
| FFO Margin % | 59.83% | 58.41% | 56.08% | 53.6% | 57.38% | 51.84% | 41.8% | 50.36% | 58.21% | 50.32% | 49.01% | 44.54% | 39.28% | 26% | 29.93% | 43.43% |
| FFO Growth % | 55.64% | 11.17% | 7.99% | -4.52% | 17.01% | 35.68% | -25.17% | -18.11% | 11.28% | 3.28% | 10.87% | 16.1% | 59.06% | -9.38% | -30.31% | - |
| FFO per Share | 2.76 | 2.60 | 2.37 | 2.21 | 2.32 | 2.00 | 1.48 | 1.97 | 2.38 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 1.85 | 1.99 | 1.62 | 1.51 | 2.16 |
| FFO Payout Ratio % | 43.98% | 44.21% | 45.96% | 47.24% | 41.44% | 43.06% | 38.7% | 56.92% | 46.4% | 49.16% | 47.22% | 47.58% | 35.65% | 15.54% | 5.7% | 0.03% |
| EPS (Diluted) | 1.38 | 1.25 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.17 | 0.90 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 1.21 | 0.98 | 0.90 | 0.64 | 0.36 | -0.49 | -0.55 | 0.30 |
| EPS Growth % | 25.69% | 12.61% | 9.9% | -13.68% | 30% | 119.51% | 41.38% | -76.03% | 23.47% | 8.89% | 40.63% | 77.78% | 173.47% | 10.91% | -283.33% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 1.26 | 1.12 | 1.01 | 1.18 | 0.91 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 1.21 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.65 | 0.37 | -0.50 | -0.55 | 0.30 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 308.13M | 307.87M | 304.04M | 302.38M | 301.74M | 298.83M | 297.9M | 299.33M | 302.34M | 305.28M | 305.06M | 305.02M | 244.59M | 188.99M | 223.49M | 223.49M |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BRX stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) reported total revenue of $1.37B. This represents a 23.2% increase compared to $1.11B in 2011.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) is profitable, generating $386.2M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 28.2%.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) reported an operating income of $503.5M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 36.7%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) generated $1.03B in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 75.2%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Mark-to-market spread exhaustion
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Growth Moderates From Peak Pace
Revenue reached $359.6 million in 2026Q3, a 5.5% year-over-year increase that extends a multi-quarter streak of mid-single-digit growth, though the pace has clearly moderated from the 7.7% logged in 2025Q4, as shown in Brixmor's reported quarterly income statement.
The sequential deceleration from the 2025 peak growth rates toward the 4-5% range suggests the portfolio's mark-to-market rent recapture may be entering a more mature phase, where gains depend increasingly on small-shop occupancy gains rather than large anchor repricing. Because revenue growth has held positive even as 2026 quarters show softer year-over-year comparisons, investors should treat the trend as a plateauing of organic momentum rather than a contraction, pending confirmation from signed-but-not-yet-committed rent conversion.
NOI Margin Volatility Distorts Underlying Economics
Property-level economics appear unusually volatile in recent periods: NOI margin printed 87.1% in 2026Q3 and just 16.1% in 2026Q1, against a stable 73.8%-76.8% band across the eight prior quarters, per Brixmor's disclosed income statement data.
The consistency of the pre-2026 margin band implies a durable triple-net recovery structure in which tenant reimbursements largely offset real estate tax and CAM inflation, making the two 2026 outliers appear more likely to reflect period-specific items than a structural shift in cost recovery. The 87.1% reading in 2026Q3 is high enough to warrant reconciliation against property tax assessment timing or expense capitalization treatment before being read as genuine operating leverage.
FFO and AFFO Compression Undermines Quality
FFO fell to $106.4 million in 2026Q3, a 46.1% year-over-year decline, while AFFO halved to $53.9 million from $131.4 million one quarter earlier, suggesting earnings quality weakened materially, according to figures from Brixmor's recent financial statements.
The divergence between still-positive revenue growth and sharply lower FFO implies that corporate-level items, plausibly interest expense on the elevated debt load or non-recurring adjustments, are absorbing property-level gains, which would compress dividend coverage if sustained. The absence of a reported FFO-per-share figure for 2026Q3 limits visibility into per-unit dilution, so the trajectory of FFO per share across the next reporting cycle is the key checkpoint for dividend safety.
2026Q2 Guidance Pivot Sets the Tone
The 2026Q2 print appears to be the pivotal period, with diluted EPS of $0.24 falling short of the $0.25 consensus even as management lifted full-year guidance, a juxtaposition that recent company commentary frames around record small-shop leasing momentum, per consensus estimates and Brixmor's guidance disclosure.
A guidance raise following an EPS miss suggests the shortfall was driven by items below the operating line rather than weakening property-level performance, which, if correct, implies the underlying NOI engine remains intact despite the headline miss. Investors should monitor whether the record small-shop occupancy and signed-rent pipeline cited by the company actually converts into recognized revenue in subsequent quarters, since that conversion is what would validate the raised outlook over the current FFO compression.
GAAP Earnings Gap Tests Quality Claims
GAAP net income of negative $7.0 thousand in 2026Q3 sits far below the $106.4 million of FFO for the same period, a gap that warrants scrutiny of depreciation and non-cash adjustments before treating operating momentum as proven, based on Brixmor's filings.
While heavy real estate depreciation routinely separates GAAP net income from FFO in this sector, the magnitude of the difference this quarter, combined with the 46.1% FFO decline, suggests the FFO reconciliation may contain offsets that deserve closer examination rather than being dismissed as pure non-cash noise. Additionally, the reliance on straight-line rent recognition, potential lease termination fee income, and capitalized internal leasing costs could be flattering reported revenue relative to cash collections, so the sustainability of the 5.5% growth rate warrants further investigation against cash-basis metrics not disclosed here.