Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -13.8x · EV/EBITDA 38.4x · ROE N/A. (2013–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $988M | $668M | $150M | $130M | $509M | $754M | $171M | $115M | $54M | $535M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise Value | $1.3B | $947M | $665M | $524M | $844M | $932M | $503M | $397M | $187M | $742M | $1.6B |
| P/E Ratio → | -13.83 | — | — | — | — | 34.69 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.68 | 1.14 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 0.84 | 1.06 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.34 | 1.06 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | 12.86 | — | — | — | 2.80 | 2.97 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 725.34 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.61 | 0.93 | 0.72 | 1.38 | 1.31 | 0.89 | 0.46 | 0.18 | 0.48 | 1.01 |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.35 | 28.67 | 15.91 | 13.94 | 36.94 | 24.68 | 33.37 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 55.32 | 59.07 | — | — | 24.32 | 15.32 | 12.76 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 24.5% | 24.7% | 24.3% | 23.8% | 24.6% | 29.3% | 18.7% | -12.2% | 6.4% | 11.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 3.9% | 3.5% | 2.3% | -0.2% | 2.7% | -0.3% | -3.4% | -40.2% | -18.1% | -6.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -6.2% | -6.2% | -8.4% | -27.1% | -3.8% | 4.3% | -1.8% | -14.2% | -68.3% | -24.4% | -7.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | -80.9% | 52.7% | — | — | — | -101.1% | -17.7% |
| ROA | -5.2% | -5.2% | -8.0% | -23.0% | -2.5% | 4.1% | -1.7% | -17.8% | -70.2% | -26.6% | -7.2% |
| ROIC | 9.1% | 9.1% | 8.8% | 4.7% | -0.3% | 12.3% | -142.1% | — | -252.6% | -48.2% | -17.8% |
| ROCE | 7.5% | 7.5% | 6.6% | 3.3% | -0.2% | 3.9% | -1.0% | -102.1% | -139.5% | -37.8% | -10.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | 6.87 | — | — | — | 1.38 | 0.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 11.16 | 11.16 | 12.87 | 11.55 | 17.96 | 10.67 | 25.83 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | 3.03 | — | — | — | 1.09 | -0.15 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 8.45 | 8.45 | 12.31 | 10.49 | 14.63 | 4.71 | 22.03 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 0.39 | 0.39 | -0.32 | -0.55 | 0.87 | 1.81 | 0.66 | -0.84 | -10.20 | -11.49 | -30.87 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.26 | 1.42 | 1.50 | 2.30 | 1.46 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.98 | 1.26 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.98 | 1.14 | 1.22 | 1.98 | 1.19 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 1.12 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.89 | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.16 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.95 | 1.37 | 1.43 | 1.18 | 1.03 |
| Inventory Turnover | 7.29 | 7.29 | 4.96 | 5.64 | 4.52 | 6.74 | 5.38 | 11.07 | 19.44 | 17.74 | 16.31 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 118.75 | 99.26 | 76.14 | 188.68 | 126.72 | 143.77 | 109.21 | 117.48 | 92.35 | 105.70 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.1% | 2.2% | 12.3% | 8.6% | 2.9% | 1.2% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 2.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 4.7% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.2% | 2.3% | 12.6% | 9.7% | 3.5% | 1.9% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 1.5% | 3.3% | 4.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $105M | $92M | $89M | $88M | $84M | $49M | $32M | $14M | $9M | $10M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 13 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BW stock.
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -13.8x. The historical average is 76.0x.
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 38.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 26.7x.
Based on historical data, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -13.8x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.13%.
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. has 24.5% gross margin and 3.9% operating margin.
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 11.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent GAAP losses and high leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Mix Shift
Gross margin swung from 36.6% in 2024Q4 to 18.7% in 2025Q1, while operating margin recovered to 3.7% in 2026Q2, per reported financials, indicating project mix dominates profitability.
The wide swings in gross margin, from 36.6% in 2024Q4 to 18.7% in 2025Q1, reflect a blend of high-margin aftermarket parts and lower-margin construction work. Operating margin of 3.7% in 2026Q2, though positive, is thin and suggests that fixed overhead and legacy costs continue to pressure earnings. The persistent negative net margin, averaging -6.2% over the last five quarters, indicates that GAAP profitability remains elusive despite the adjusted EPS beat, implying that the core business may be generating operating leverage but not yet translating into bottom-line results.
Return on Capital Remains Inconsistent
ROIC swung from -5.6% in 2024Q4 to 10.5% in 2025Q4, but 2026Q1 fell to -1.3%, per financial statements, suggesting returns are not yet compounding consistently.
ROIC has been highly volatile, ranging from -5.6% in 2024Q4 to 10.5% in 2025Q4, with 2026Q1 at -1.3%. This inconsistency suggests that the company has not yet achieved a stable return on invested capital, likely due to project timing and restructuring charges. The positive ROIC in 2025Q4 and 2026Q2 (implied by ROE of 18.4%) may indicate early signs of improvement, but the negative quarters in between highlight the fragility of these returns. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can sustain above the cost of capital, as the current volatility suggests a business still in transition.
Working Capital Efficiency Shows Improvement
Cash conversion cycle improved from 326 days in 2024Q4 to 73 days in 2026Q1, per reported data, driven by faster receivables collection and inventory turnover, though 2026Q2 data is unavailable.
The cash conversion cycle has improved dramatically from 326 days in 2024Q4 to 73 days in 2026Q1, reflecting a significant reduction in DSO from 323 to 88 days and DIO from 247 to 32 days. This suggests that management is focusing on working capital discipline, possibly by shedding slow-paying projects or improving collection processes. However, the improvement may be partly due to the revenue decline, as lower volumes can distort DSO and DIO. The 2026Q2 CCC is not reported, but the prior quarter's improvement indicates a positive trend in operational efficiency, though sustainability remains uncertain given the project-based nature of the business.
Leverage Elevated Despite Debt Reduction
Debt-to-equity stands at 3.27 in 2026Q2, with D/EBITDA at 15.95, per financial statements, indicating high leverage despite a recent debt reduction from $537.9M to $187.7M.
Although total debt has been reduced significantly from $537.9M in 2024Q4 to $187.7M in 2026Q2, the debt-to-equity ratio of 3.27 remains elevated, reflecting a thin equity base. Interest coverage of 2.35 in 2026Q2 is an improvement from negative levels in prior quarters, but it remains low, suggesting that debt service is still a burden. The high D/EBITDA of 15.95 indicates that EBITDA is not yet sufficient to comfortably cover debt, and the recent improvement in coverage may be fragile if EBITDA declines. Investors should monitor whether the company can sustain this deleveraging trajectory without further equity dilution or asset sales.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens but Remains Thin
Current ratio improved to 1.45 in 2026Q2 from 0.94 in 2025Q1, with cash at $308.6M, per balance sheet data, providing a stronger buffer against near-term obligations.
The current ratio has improved from 0.94 in 2025Q1 to 1.45 in 2026Q2, and the quick ratio rose to 1.33, indicating that the company has more current assets to cover short-term liabilities. Cash increased to $308.6M, which provides a cushion, but the negative operating cash flow of -$17.4M in 2026Q2 suggests that the liquidity position may be supported by external financing rather than operational cash generation. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged revenue decline or project delays, the current ratio could deteriorate quickly, especially given the high leverage and thin equity base.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Project-Based Business
EV/EBITDA of 48.44 is misleading for BW due to volatile EBITDA from project timing and restructuring charges, per reported figures, obscuring the underlying earnings power.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 48.44 is commonly used to value BW, but it is often misapplied because EBITDA is highly volatile due to percentage-of-completion accounting and one-time charges. For a company with significant project-based revenue, EBITDA can swing dramatically from quarter to quarter, making the multiple unreliable. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBIT or EV/EBITDA adjusted for non-recurring items and normalized for project cycles. Additionally, given the negative net income, investors should focus on cash flow-based metrics like EV/FCF, though FCF is also negative, indicating that the company is not yet generating sustainable cash earnings.