Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 14.7x · EV/EBITDA 9.1x · ROE 12.3%. (2003–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $522M | $359M | $241M | $231M | $225M | $255M | $151M | $225M | $223M | $263M | $243M |
| Enterprise Value | $477M | $313M | $107M | $122M | $39M | $48M | $-53599744 | $322M | $333M | $417M | $332M |
| P/E Ratio → | 14.71 | 10.30 | 25.33 | 6.46 | 6.14 | 9.77 | 26.07 | 12.48 | 12.99 | 19.29 | 20.06 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.82 | 3.31 | 2.77 | 2.32 | 2.30 | 3.47 | 2.62 | 3.81 | 3.71 | 4.46 | 4.70 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.70 | 1.19 | 0.89 | 0.87 | 0.94 | 1.26 | 0.86 | 1.23 | 1.28 | 1.64 | 1.67 |
| P/FCF | 19.24 | 13.22 | 8.22 | 7.72 | 2.89 | 6.57 | 83.00 | 37.51 | 13.43 | 14.09 | 27.14 |
| P/OCF | 18.46 | 12.68 | 8.05 | 7.23 | 2.72 | 7.38 | — | 33.86 | 11.17 | 12.80 | 14.01 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.89 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.93 | 5.45 | 5.53 | 7.07 | 6.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.07 | 5.96 | 6.25 | 2.37 | 0.76 | 1.28 | -5.07 | 12.22 | 14.55 | 15.65 | 16.59 |
| EV / EBIT | 9.83 | 6.46 | 8.02 | 2.55 | 0.81 | 1.41 | -7.34 | 14.02 | 15.74 | 16.59 | 18.16 |
| EV / FCF | — | 11.55 | 3.65 | 4.10 | 0.50 | 1.23 | -29.37 | 53.74 | 20.03 | 22.30 | 37.06 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 51.6% | 51.6% | 32.9% | 50.9% | 76.3% | 84.6% | 62.4% | 66.4% | 67.6% | 76.0% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.3% | 23.3% | 6.8% | 24.9% | 39.7% | 38.9% | 9.1% | 26.0% | 25.2% | 33.1% | 28.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.9% | 16.9% | 5.0% | 19.0% | 30.9% | 30.5% | 7.3% | 20.7% | 20.8% | 18.2% | 19.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.3% | 12.3% | 3.6% | 14.5% | 17.0% | 14.0% | 3.3% | 10.2% | 10.4% | 9.0% | 8.9% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| ROIC | 8.0% | 8.0% | 2.3% | 8.8% | 10.5% | 7.7% | 1.5% | 4.8% | 4.3% | 5.3% | 4.5% |
| ROCE | 4.4% | 4.4% | 2.8% | 11.0% | 14.0% | 10.2% | 2.0% | 6.4% | 5.7% | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.42 | 1.13 | 0.96 | 1.06 | 1.39 | 1.27 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.42 | 3.42 | 9.32 | 3.08 | 3.10 | 2.26 | 18.93 | 6.66 | 8.09 | 8.41 | 9.23 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.15 | -0.50 | -0.41 | -0.78 | -1.03 | -1.16 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.95 | 0.61 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.86 | -0.86 | -7.84 | -2.10 | -3.62 | -5.53 | -19.39 | 3.69 | 4.80 | 5.76 | 4.44 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.67 | -4.57 | -3.62 | -2.39 | -5.34 | -112.37 | 16.23 | 6.60 | 8.21 | 9.92 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 2.07 | 2.51 | 0.32 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 1.49 | 1.54 |
Net cash position: cash ($225M) exceeds total debt ($180M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.07 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.2% | 1.7% | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 2.0% | 2.9% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Payout Ratio | 17.8% | 17.8% | 64.3% | 17.0% | 16.5% | 18.9% | 74.3% | 22.4% | 21.6% | 15.5% | 13.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.8% | 9.7% | 3.9% | 15.5% | 16.3% | 10.2% | 3.8% | 8.0% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| FCF Yield | 5.2% | 7.6% | 12.2% | 12.9% | 34.6% | 15.2% | 1.2% | 2.7% | 7.4% | 7.1% | 3.7% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.0% | 2.5% | 2.0% | 0.7% | 0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.5% | 2.1% | 3.5% | 2.7% | 5.2% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 2.3% | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $8M | $7M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BWFG stock.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 14.7x. The historical average is 31.6x. This places it at the 38th percentile of its historical range.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 9.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 19.9x.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.3%. The historical average is 5.7%.
Based on historical data, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 14.7x. This is at the 38th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.22% with a payout ratio of 17.8%.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. has 51.6% gross margin and 23.3% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.4x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Low absolute profitability levels
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation on Low Absolute Returns
At a P/B of 1.72, BWFG trades at a significant premium to peers like NBTB (1.39) and DCOM (1.19), despite reporting an ROE of just 3.9% in 2026Q2, suggesting the market is pricing in substantial future earnings growth or a higher sustainable return on equity.
The valuation premium is striking given the bank's current profitability metrics. A P/B of 1.72 typically implies an expected ROTCE in the low-to-mid teens, yet BWFG's trailing ROE is less than 4%. This disconnect suggests the market may be anticipating a significant expansion in net interest margin or a reduction in the cost of equity as the bank completes its balance sheet restructuring. Investors should monitor whether the improving NIM trend can accelerate enough to justify the multiple.
ROE Recovery Driven by NIM and Efficiency
ROE has expanded from a trough of 0.4% in 2024Q2 to 3.9% in 2026Q2, driven primarily by a 20 basis point expansion in NIM to 0.8% and a stable efficiency ratio, as indicated by the company's quarterly financial data.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the profitability improvement is almost entirely margin-driven, with the equity multiplier (leverage) remaining constant at an equity-to-assets ratio of 0.09. The efficiency ratio has fluctuated but remains in the mid-to-high 20% range, which is excellent and provides a strong foundation. However, the absolute level of ROE remains well below the cost of equity, indicating that the bank is still in a recovery phase and has not yet achieved full profitability normalization.
NIM Expansion Faces Headwinds from Asset Mix Shift
NIM improved to 0.8% in 2026Q2 from 0.7% a year prior, but the bank's dramatic shift from a $2.8B securities portfolio to loans may create future margin pressure as higher-yielding assets are replaced.
The NIM expansion is a positive signal of improved asset-liability management in a favorable rate environment. However, the prior balance sheet analysis indicates a massive reallocation from securities to loans. As the existing securities portfolio, which likely carries lower yields from the low-rate era, matures or is sold, the bank will need to reinvest at current higher rates, which could support NIM. Conversely, if loan growth slows or competition intensifies, the new, higher-cost loan book could compress margins. The efficiency ratio's volatility, spiking to 31.6% in 2026Q1 before falling to 27.4%, warrants monitoring for cost control consistency.
Capital Position Supports Modest Growth and Returns
With an equity-to-assets ratio of 0.09 and total equity growing 20.3% year-over-year to $323.5M in 2026Q2, BWFG appears to have adequate capital to support its current growth trajectory and dividend payments.
The bank's capital generation is solid, driven by retained earnings as profitability improves. The equity-to-assets ratio has been stable, suggesting management is not overleveraging the balance sheet to boost ROE. Given the low absolute ROE, the capacity for significant capital return via buybacks appears limited, as retained earnings are likely needed to support asset growth. The primary capital constraint is not regulatory but rather the need to achieve a return on equity that exceeds the cost of capital.
Provision Volatility Obscures Underlying Credit Trends
Loan loss provisions have been highly erratic, swinging from an $8.2M charge in 2024Q2 to a $1.0M benefit in 2026Q1, making it difficult to assess the true underlying credit quality trajectory based on the reported figures.
The extreme volatility in provision expense is the most concerning aspect of the bank's financial profile. This pattern suggests either significant uncertainty in management's credit outlook or lumpy, event-driven reserve adjustments. Without stable, predictable provisioning, it is challenging to model future earnings or assess whether the current reserve levels are adequate for the loan portfolio's risk profile. This volatility directly impacts the reliability of the ROE trend, as earnings are being distorted by non-cash provision swings.
P/B Multiple Misleads on Earnings Power
The P/B ratio of 1.72 is the most commonly misapplied metric for BWFG, as it implies a level of sustainable profitability that the bank's current 3.9% ROE does not support, potentially masking the risk of multiple compression if earnings growth stalls.
Investors often use P/B as a primary valuation tool for banks, but it is only meaningful when compared to the bank's return on tangible equity. BWFG's P/B suggests the market expects its ROTCE to rise to peer levels (11-12%), but this is not yet achieved. The ratio obscures the bank's current low earnings power and the execution risk in its balance sheet transformation. A more appropriate metric would be P/E relative to normalized earnings, which would highlight the significant earnings growth required to justify the current valuation.