Cash flow generation is highly unstable, highlighted by a massive $53.6M free cash flow burn in 2016Q2 and an OCF/NI ratio that frequently deviates into extreme negative territory.
| Cash from Operations | 474.5K | -50.31M | -7.38M | -54.44M | 35.48M | -15.35M | -16.08M | 16.43M | 6.04M | -6.83M | -52.25K |
| Operating CF Margin % | - | -10.77% | -1.65% | -13.53% | 7.73% | -2.6% | -3.56% | 6.37% | 2.81% | -3.6% | -367.78% |
| Operating CF Growth % | 538.21% | -581.76% | 86.44% | -253.44% | 331.12% | 4.5% | -197.87% | 172.01% | 188.35% | -12981.67% | - |
| Net Income | -1.36M | 3.98M | -12.01M | -26.86M | 524.26K | 2.57M | 8M | 8M | 5.5M | 3.99M | -48.89K |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 89.3K | 80.71K | 2.38M | 2.62M | 314.13K | 341.48K | 491.48K | 257.95K | 211.4K | 200.7K | 0 |
| Stock-Based Compensation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred Taxes | 0 | 0 | -976.05K | -1.37M | -32.42K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Non-Cash Items | 1.5M | -4.97M | 6.48M | 22.2M | 1.25M | 3.71M | 1.03M | 125.36K | 272.3K | 410.74K | 0 |
| Working Capital Changes | 247.16K | -49.41M | -3.25M | -51.03M | 33.42M | -21.97M | -25.6M | 8.04M | 54.77K | -11.43M | -3.36K |
| Change in Receivables | 90.18M | 29.32M | 5.86M | -67.94M | 0 | 107.89K | 43.31K | 44.05K | 11.08K | -2.28M | 0 |
| Change in Inventory | 6.49M | -2.01M | -282.01K | -1.39M | 13.71M | 1.56M | -8.26M | -1.89M | -21.38K | -7.92M | 0 |
| Change in Payables | -648.12K | -922.58K | 1.3M | 99.06K | 0 | -1.56K | -26.11K | 9.9M | 28.48K | -433.15K | 0 |
| Cash from Investing | -368.45K | 21.06M | 4.92M | -18.2M | -31.48M | -6.06K | -97.14K | 1.46M | -4.72M | 6.39M | 0 |
| Capital Expenditures | -7.79K | -336.95K | -3.6K | -11.07K | -14.84K | -6.06K | -127.14K | -298.2K | -76.22K | -186.77K | 0 |
| CapEx % of Revenue | 0% | 0.07% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0.03% | 0.12% | 0.04% | 0.1% | - |
| Acquisitions | -365.76K | 21.39M | 3.05M | 0 | -38.57M | 0 | 0 | 1.68M | -444.12K | 0 | 0 |
| Investments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Investing | 5.11K | 8.43K | 1.88M | -18.19M | 7.11M | 0 | 30K | 78.99K | -4.2M | 6.57M | 0 |
| Cash from Financing | 4.32M | 25.43M | 2.19M | 65.47M | 1.95M | 16.06M | 6.21M | -2.71M | -662.65K | -3.99M | 58.87K |
| Debt Issued (Net) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity Issued (Net) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividends Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share Repurchases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Financing | 4.32M | 25.43M | 2.19M | 65.47M | 1.95M | 16.06M | 6.21M | -2.71M | -662.65K | -3.99M | 58.87K |
| Net Change in Cash | 4.35M | -4.11M | -674.27K | -7.25M | 6.15M | 703.96K | -9.55M | 15.48M | 656.28K | -4.1M | 6.63K |
| Free Cash Flow | 466.7K | -50.65M | -7.38M | -54.45M | 35.46M | -15.36M | -16.2M | 16.13M | 5.96M | -7.02M | -52.25K |
| FCF Margin % | 0.09% | -10.84% | -1.65% | -13.54% | 7.72% | -2.6% | -3.58% | 6.26% | 2.77% | -3.7% | -367.78% |
| FCF Growth % | 100.86% | -585.99% | 86.44% | -253.54% | 330.93% | 5.22% | -200.47% | 170.49% | 184.91% | -13339.15% | - |
| FCF per Share | 0.11 | -12.56 | -1.83 | -13.50 | 9.53 | -4.16 | -4.71 | 5.29 | 1.98 | -3.34 | -0.32 |
| FCF Conversion (FCF/Net Income) | -0.34x | -12.63x | 0.61x | 2.03x | 67.68x | -5.98x | -2.01x | 2.05x | 1.10x | -1.71x | 1.07x |
| Interest Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taxes Paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Liquidity and regulatory insolvency
As reported in historical financial statements, CALI exhibits a profound disconnect between net income and operating cash flow, with OCF/NI ratios frequently swinging into extreme negative territory, such as the -10.27x observed in 2016Q2, indicating that reported earnings provide little insight into actual cash generation.
The persistent divergence between accounting profits and cash flow suggests that the company's earnings are heavily influenced by non-cash accruals and timing differences inherent in its high-volume trading model. Investors should monitor this volatility, as it implies that the firm's reported profitability is not translating into the liquidity required to sustain its capital-intensive import operations.
Based on the provided quarterly data, CALI's free cash flow trajectory is highly unstable, characterized by massive periodic outflows such as the $53.6M burn in 2016Q2, which underscores the company's inability to generate consistent, self-sustaining cash flow from its core automotive logistics and brokerage activities.
The erratic nature of FCF margins, which frequently dip deep into negative territory, suggests that the business model is highly sensitive to external shocks and inventory cycles. This lack of consistent cash generation warrants further investigation into whether the company can maintain operations without frequent reliance on external financing or liquidity support.
According to recent SEC filings, CALI's cash flow is dominated by violent swings in working capital, including a $52.1M outflow in 2016Q2, which highlights the extreme sensitivity of the company's liquidity to the timing of vehicle imports and the subsequent collection of receivables from its wholesale clients.
The company's reliance on managing large inventory and receivable balances within a razor-thin margin environment creates a precarious liquidity cycle. Any delay in the conversion of inventory to cash appears to threaten the firm's ability to meet its immediate obligations, given the limited cash reserves available.
As indicated by the financial data, CALI maintains a negligible capital expenditure profile with CapEx/Revenue ratios consistently near 0.0%, reflecting a business model that relies on existing port infrastructure rather than significant investment in proprietary physical assets or long-term manufacturing capacity.
While the low capital intensity might appear favorable, it also suggests that the company lacks the physical moat that would come from owning significant logistical infrastructure. This asset-light approach may leave the firm vulnerable to changes in port access fees or regulatory shifts that could disrupt its ability to facilitate imports.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CALI stock.
China Auto Logistics Inc. (CALI) generated $-50.3M in net cash from operating activities in 2016. This reflects the cash generated directly from core business operations.
China Auto Logistics Inc. (CALI) reported negative free cash flow of $50.7M in 2016, indicating capital requirements exceeded cash from operations.
China Auto Logistics Inc. (CALI) spent $0.3M on capital expenditures in 2016. CapEx represents the cash invested in physical assets like property, plant, and equipment to maintain or grow the business.