Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -7.4x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -95.6%. (2011–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $258M | $387M | $416M | $167M | $205M | $233M | $252M | $63M | $17M | $21M | $9M |
| Enterprise Value | $270M | $400M | $399M | $158M | $189M | $191M | $256M | $60M | $18M | $17M | $11M |
| P/E Ratio → | -7.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 5.67 | 10.48 | 13.24 | 6.97 | 9.97 | 14.27 | 19.63 | 5.63 | 2.33 | 2.88 | 1.63 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.69 | 13.82 | 16.37 | 7.89 | 5.55 | 4.77 | 105.95 | 13.77 | 11.35 | 3.65 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 10.81 | 12.72 | 6.59 | 9.21 | 11.71 | 19.94 | 5.34 | 2.38 | 2.29 | 1.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 61.4% | 60.9% | 56.8% | 65.8% | 68.2% | 71.1% | 64.9% | 66.9% | 60.7% | 54.0% |
| Operating Margin | -65.4% | -65.4% | -62.9% | -93.7% | -79.5% | -82.1% | -48.5% | -41.0% | -71.4% | -85.9% | -130.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -69.1% | -69.1% | -60.3% | -92.2% | -80.0% | -88.4% | -52.9% | -49.4% | -83.8% | -97.1% | -140.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -95.6% | -95.6% | -81.2% | -76.1% | -38.4% | -56.3% | -194.8% | -181.7% | -167.9% | -282.6% | — |
| ROA | -37.3% | -37.3% | -46.2% | -45.0% | -27.1% | -30.3% | -32.7% | -56.0% | -56.7% | -67.3% | -92.2% |
| ROIC | -73.7% | -73.7% | -142.2% | -101.3% | -86.8% | -150.2% | -120.4% | -212.4% | -235.1% | -506.3% | -982.7% |
| ROCE | -41.7% | -41.7% | -61.6% | -53.5% | -29.8% | -30.7% | -36.2% | -65.9% | -68.4% | -91.3% | -219.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.08 | 2.08 | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 10.15 | 0.54 | 2.30 | 0.84 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.44 | -0.65 | -0.43 | -0.42 | -0.86 | 1.69 | -0.70 | 0.25 | -0.75 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -9.67 | -9.67 | — | — | -201.90 | -13.81 | -3.70 | -4.80 | -5.29 | -7.21 | -6.62 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 5.91 | 5.91 | 3.22 | 4.87 | 7.54 | 13.02 | 7.96 | 2.71 | 3.31 | 2.90 | 2.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 5.13 | 5.13 | 2.56 | 3.80 | 6.17 | 11.98 | 6.95 | 1.86 | 2.27 | 2.37 | 1.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.27 | 4.27 | 1.94 | 3.11 | 5.52 | 11.38 | 6.28 | 1.49 | 1.54 | 2.11 | 1.10 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.38 | 0.80 | 0.56 | 0.37 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.53 | 0.78 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 1.31 | 0.75 | 1.05 | 1.15 | 1.22 | 1.16 | 1.25 | 1.49 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 71.70 | 54.80 | 60.09 | 47.33 | 52.33 | 53.52 | 35.47 | 61.25 | 46.96 | 54.97 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $28M | $27M | $25M | $24M | $21M | $16M | $13M | $11M | $8M | $3M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 15 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CLPT stock.
ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -7.4x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
ClearPoint Neuro, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -95.6%. The historical average is -130.5%.
Based on historical data, ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -7.4x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. has 61.4% gross margin and -65.4% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Against Deeply Negative Earnings
Based on reported figures, CLPT trades at 6.98 times sales and 8.69 times book value with a trailing P/E of -9.56, a price-to-sales multiple that implies the market is pricing future revenue scale rather than current earnings power. Forward multiples are unavailable, so the valuation cannot be checked against consensus earnings expectations.
A 6.98 price-to-sales ratio is high for a medical device company whose operating margin was -52.4% in 2026Q3, suggesting investors are capitalizing a revenue trajectory that has not yet reached operating breakeven. Compared with Novocure, which carries a 4.35 price-to-book ratio against its own negative returns, CLPT's 8.69 price-to-book appears to embed an even larger premium on intangible and growth expectations. Without EV/EBITDA or forward earnings, investors should monitor whether revenue growth can convert into margin expansion before the multiple can be justified on earnings.
Stable Gross Margin Masks Operating Losses
As reported in the income statement, CLPT's gross margin held between 58% and 64% across ten quarters, yet operating margin stood at -52.4% in 2026Q3, indicating that the cost base beneath gross profit remains far larger than the revenue it supports.
The stability of gross margin suggests the product economics are not the primary problem, since each device sold appears to contribute meaningfully to fixed costs. The gap between a roughly 58% gross margin and a -52.4% operating margin implies operating expenses consuming more than a full revenue-equivalent, which points to a cost structure built for a much larger revenue base. Net margin of -61.8% and the narrowing from -104.2% in 2026Q2 suggest improvement is occurring, but investors should monitor whether operating leverage emerges as revenue scales.
Deeply Negative Returns Still Deteriorating
According to reported quarterly figures, CLPT's ROIC fell from -27.1% in 2024Q2 to -9.5% in 2026Q3 after reaching -46.5% in 2025Q1, while ROE of -39.2% in 2026Q3 reflects continued value destruction on book equity.
The recent improvement in ROIC from the -46.5% trough is more a function of a larger invested capital base than of profit recovery, since operating losses remain substantial. ROE at -39.2% against a rebounding equity balance suggests the denominator is being inflated by recent capital raises rather than earnings. Investors should monitor whether the company can move ROIC toward positive territory, as the current trajectory reflects capital being absorbed rather than compounded.
Debt Expansion Outpacing Earnings Capacity
As reported in financial statements, CLPT's debt-to-equity ratio reached 2.70 in 2026Q3 after peaking near 5.93 in 2026Q2, while interest coverage has been negative in every quarter, meaning operating earnings cannot service existing interest obligations.
Interest coverage below zero across the period indicates that debt service is being met from balance sheet resources or new financing rather than operating income, which warrants further investigation into the repayment schedule. The decline in debt-to-equity from its Q2 peak likely reflects equity recovery rather than debt reduction, so the underlying leverage burden may be less improved than the headline ratio suggests. Refinancing risk should be monitored closely given the absence of positive earnings coverage.
Strong Current Ratio Under Cash Consumption
Based on reported figures, CLPT's current ratio of 6.76 and quick ratio of 5.77 in 2026Q3 suggest near-term obligations are well covered, though cash of $46.2M is being consumed by operations at a pace that will test this position over time.
A quick ratio close to the current ratio indicates that current assets are dominated by cash and receivables rather than inventory, which supports the liquidity read. However, the current ratio has moved from 3.22 in 2024Q4 to 6.76, a shift that may reflect recent funding rather than operational strength. Under continued operating cash burn, investors should monitor how quickly the cash balance is depleted relative to the current liability base.
Misapplied Gross Margin as Earnings Proxy
The ratio most commonly misapplied to CLPT is gross margin, which at roughly 58% to 64% can appear to signal a healthy device business while obscuring operating losses that exceed revenue in magnitude.
Medical device companies are often evaluated on gross margin because it reflects manufacturing economics, yet for a company at this stage the metric omits the sales, research, and stock-based compensation costs that drive the -52.4% operating margin. A more informative lens is operating cash burn relative to revenue, such as free cash flow margin, which ranged from -14.9% to -116.5% over the period. Stock-based compensation of roughly $1.9M to $2.3M per quarter also flatters operating results and should be considered when assessing true economic earnings.