Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 18.5x · EV/EBITDA 11.2x · ROE 9.5%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $99.6B | $91.1B | $83.2B | $74.8B | $79.3B | $80.7B | $67.6B | $66.5B | $61.1B | $58.9B | $53.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $190.2B | $181.7B | $168.1B | $155.0B | $153.8B | $148.6B | $131.4B | $128.9B | $118.6B | $113.4B | $104.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 18.49 | 18.58 | 18.87 | 17.87 | 32.49 | 21.23 | 53.23 | 18.03 | 22.89 | 19.29 | 24.96 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.95 | 2.83 | 2.74 | 2.57 | 2.76 | 3.28 | 2.89 | 2.65 | 2.49 | 2.50 | 2.36 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.87 | 1.72 | 1.62 | 1.49 | 1.53 | 1.58 | 1.37 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.41 | 1.31 |
| P/FCF | 13.45 | — | 1732.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 8.06 | 7.37 | 6.75 | 7.57 | 13.38 | 9.73 | 7.63 | 8.10 | 8.50 | 8.89 | 7.89 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.64 | 5.54 | 5.33 | 5.35 | 6.04 | 5.62 | 5.14 | 4.84 | 4.81 | 4.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.19 | 12.19 | 11.72 | 11.79 | 12.97 | 13.31 | 13.06 | 11.84 | 12.64 | 11.73 | 11.50 |
| EV / EBIT | 22.18 | 19.44 | 19.60 | 19.92 | 23.60 | 23.97 | 43.55 | 20.45 | 22.95 | 18.14 | 18.48 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 3501.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 31.6% | 31.6% | 50.1% | 47.3% | 45.1% | 48.6% | 48.6% | 46.1% | 42.9% | 45.4% | 42.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 26.6% | 26.1% | 24.3% | 20.9% | 22.3% | 19.6% | 22.8% | 19.1% | 23.9% | 22.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 15.4% | 15.4% | 14.9% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 15.9% | 5.9% | 14.9% | 10.9% | 13.0% | 11.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.5% | 9.5% | 8.9% | 5.6% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 2.8% | 8.2% | 6.2% | 7.4% | 6.6% |
| ROA | 2.6% | 2.6% | 2.5% | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.4% | 0.9% | 2.5% | 1.9% | 2.3% | 2.1% |
| ROIC | 4.6% | 4.6% | 4.5% | 4.1% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 3.1% | 4.0% | 3.6% | 4.5% | 4.5% |
| ROCE | 5.0% | 5.0% | 4.9% | 4.4% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 3.2% | 4.2% | 3.7% | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 1.44 | 1.33 | 1.30 | 1.31 | 1.32 | 1.30 | 1.23 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 6.10 | 6.10 | 5.94 | 6.12 | 6.32 | 6.12 | 6.37 | 5.76 | 6.18 | 5.63 | 5.55 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.71 | 1.66 | 1.60 | 1.44 | 1.33 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.08 | 6.08 | 5.92 | 6.10 | 6.28 | 6.08 | 6.35 | 5.73 | 6.13 | 5.64 | 5.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 1769.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 2.57 | 2.57 | 2.53 | 2.58 | 2.67 | 2.81 | 1.40 | 2.86 | 2.47 | 3.15 | 3.27 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.53 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.40 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.39 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.83 | 4.83 | 3.36 | 3.57 | 4.41 | 4.07 | 3.79 | 4.18 | 4.54 | 3.98 | 3.72 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.3% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Payout Ratio | 66.4% | 66.4% | 71.2% | 114.2% | 124.7% | 79.7% | 204.2% | 71.2% | 92.7% | 80.1% | 87.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 5.4% | 5.4% | 5.3% | 5.6% | 3.1% | 4.7% | 1.9% | 5.5% | 4.4% | 5.2% | 4.0% |
| FCF Yield | 7.4% | — | 0.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.3% | 3.6% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 3.9% | 4.2% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $777M | $772M | $771M | $770M | $769M | $738M | $729M | $708M | $700M | $691M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying DUK stock.
Duke Energy Corporation's current P/E ratio is 18.5x. The historical average is 17.7x. This places it at the 62th percentile of its historical range.
Duke Energy Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 11.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.0x.
Duke Energy Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 9.5%. The historical average is 8.0%.
Based on historical data, Duke Energy Corporation is trading at a P/E of 18.5x. This is at the 62th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Duke Energy Corporation's current dividend yield is 3.32% with a payout ratio of 66.4%.
Duke Energy Corporation has 31.6% gross margin and 26.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Duke Energy Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 6.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory lag and capex funding
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Demand Regulatory Execution
Based on DUK's reported 18.49x trailing P/E and 1.87x P/B against a 3.3% dividend yield, the stock trades near the middle of its utility peer set, suggesting investors are pricing in steady rate base growth rather than a valuation dislocation. The multiple appears to lean on continued constructive regulatory outcomes.
The 18.49x trailing P/E sits below Southern and Dominion but above Exelon and PG&E, implying the market is not assigning a clear premium for the Carolinas footprint. With a PEG of 0.62, the market appears to be pricing little earnings growth, which may be conservative if rate base expansion sustains mid-single-digit earnings growth. Investors should monitor whether the 3.3% yield remains competitive against Treasuries if rates stay elevated.
Earned Returns Track Below Authorized Levels
As reported in financial statements, DUK's quarterly ROE ranged from 1.7% to 2.8% over the ten quarters, a level that appears low relative to typical authorized returns and suggests a meaningful gap between earned and allowed returns that warrants further investigation.
The ROE figures shown are quarterly and not annualized, so direct comparison to authorized ROE requires annualizing the data, which would place earned returns in the high single digits. Even so, the gap between earned and allowed returns is an analytical question worth tracking. Regulatory lag on the expanding rate base may be contributing to a persistent shortfall.
Margins Hinge on Recovery Timing
Based on DUK's reported figures, operating margin moved between 23.8% and 30.2% across the ten quarters, with the 2026Q3 reading of 30.2% appearing to reflect seasonal load and recovery timing rather than a durable step-up in cost recovery.
Operating margins rising from the low 20s to above 29% over two years may indicate improved rate recovery, though the volatility suggests weather and timing effects are doing much of the work. Fuel costs, which are typically pass-through, inflate revenue without affecting earnings power, so margin comparisons should be read carefully. Persistent regulatory lag remains a plausible drag on normalized margins.
Debt Burden Rising With Rate Base
As reported in financial statements, DUK's debt-to-capital held near 0.62 to 0.63 across the period while interest coverage ranged from 2.14x to 3.02x, suggesting leverage is stable in ratio terms but the absolute debt load continues to grow with the capex program.
Stable debt-to-capital alongside an expanding asset base implies the company is financing growth in roughly fixed proportion, which is consistent with regulated capital structure requirements. Interest coverage in the low-to-mid 2x range leaves limited cushion if earnings or recovery timing deteriorate. FFO to debt around 4x to 5x is adequate for the sector but warrants monitoring as debt grows.
Dividend Covered by Operations, Not Free Cash
Based on DUK's reported quarterly figures, the dividend payout ratio swung between 54.6% and 113.3%, while operating cash flow covered dividends roughly 1.8x to 4.3x, suggesting the dividend is supported by operations even as free cash flow remains negative.
Operating cash flow covering dividends by a comfortable margin suggests the payout is sustainable on an operating basis. However, with capex consistently exceeding operating cash flow, the dividend is effectively funded in the context of external capital needs. Investors should monitor whether continued equity or debt issuance is required to sustain the capital program alongside the payout.
P/E Misapplied to Capital-Intensive Earnings
Comparing DUK's 18.49x trailing P/E to industrial or growth-sector benchmarks may obscure that utility earnings depend on allowed ROE and rate base growth, and that AFUDC can inflate reported earnings ahead of cash recovery.
Applying a growth-equity lens to a bond-proxy utility misreads the valuation, since the multiple is anchored more to interest rates and allowed returns than to growth expectations. AFUDC and regulatory assets can make headline earnings look stronger than cash generation, which is consistent with the negative free cash flow observed. A more appropriate framework would weight allowed ROE, rate base growth, and FFO to debt over raw P/E.