Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 109.5x · EV/EBITDA 17.4x · ROE 4.7%. (1997–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.8B | $28.8B | $29.1B | $38.4B | $70.9B | $92.9B | $117.1B | $69.2B | $67.8B | $53.6B | $35.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $45.6B | $34.5B | $35.6B | $44.8B | $77.0B | $96.6B | $120.3B | $73.0B | $68.2B | $55.0B | $38.2B |
| P/E Ratio → | 109.49 | 157.90 | — | 98.52 | 70.39 | 38.88 | 40.83 | 101.44 | 37.99 | 48.37 | 28.65 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.60 | 1.91 | 2.03 | 2.46 | 4.45 | 5.24 | 7.22 | 4.84 | 4.56 | 3.92 | 3.03 |
| P/B Ratio | 10.55 | 7.57 | 7.53 | 7.22 | 11.04 | 14.45 | 16.86 | 17.47 | 15.38 | 11.38 | 8.13 |
| P/FCF | 26.24 | 21.89 | 43.43 | 26.64 | — | 46.46 | 39.12 | 41.78 | 38.25 | 27.58 | 27.62 |
| P/OCF | 22.45 | 16.24 | 22.87 | 16.27 | 40.94 | 30.57 | 32.25 | 30.36 | 26.95 | 20.84 | 19.89 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.30 | 2.49 | 2.87 | 4.84 | 5.45 | 7.42 | 5.11 | 4.59 | 4.02 | 3.23 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.43 | 13.97 | 18.09 | 24.97 | 34.18 | 24.79 | 36.79 | 59.98 | 23.78 | 21.26 | 17.64 |
| EV / EBIT | 27.16 | 40.60 | — | 38.97 | 46.62 | 30.16 | 34.32 | 60.48 | 27.97 | 26.08 | 22.23 |
| EV / FCF | — | 26.25 | 53.20 | 31.10 | — | 48.31 | 40.17 | 44.05 | 38.49 | 28.28 | 29.50 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.5% | 75.5% | 74.0% | 71.7% | 71.3% | 75.7% | 76.4% | 75.2% | 77.2% | 79.2% | 79.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 11.1% | 8.0% | 6.2% | 9.5% | 17.9% | 16.1% | 4.2% | 15.6% | 15.0% | 14.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 1.2% | 1.2% | -7.9% | 2.5% | 6.3% | 13.5% | 17.7% | 4.8% | 12.0% | 8.1% | 10.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 4.7% | 4.7% | -24.7% | 6.6% | 15.7% | 35.7% | 52.6% | 16.3% | 39.1% | 24.3% | 31.3% |
| ROA | 0.9% | 0.9% | -5.5% | 1.7% | 4.5% | 11.1% | 14.4% | 4.4% | 13.9% | 9.2% | 12.0% |
| ROIC | 12.6% | 12.6% | 7.7% | 6.0% | 10.0% | 23.5% | 22.0% | 7.2% | 31.8% | 23.9% | 21.7% |
| ROCE | 12.0% | 12.0% | 7.5% | 5.9% | 9.4% | 20.0% | 17.9% | 5.7% | 26.0% | 22.8% | 22.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.43 | 2.43 | 2.45 | 1.85 | 1.58 | 1.19 | 1.17 | 2.22 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.81 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.74 | 3.74 | 4.81 | 5.47 | 4.51 | 1.96 | 2.48 | 7.22 | 1.19 | 1.37 | 1.65 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.51 | 1.69 | 1.21 | 0.96 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.95 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.32 | 2.32 | 3.32 | 3.58 | 2.73 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 3.10 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 1.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 4.37 | 9.77 | 4.46 | — | 1.84 | 1.05 | 2.27 | 0.24 | 0.70 | 1.88 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.55 | 2.55 | -1.69 | 3.04 | 6.48 | 19.18 | 20.25 | 7.50 | 18.35 | 16.47 | 16.70 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.30 | 1.39 | 1.46 | 1.60 | 1.84 | 1.72 | 1.57 | 1.86 | 1.76 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.10 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 1.13 | 1.37 | 1.23 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.65 | 0.82 | 0.62 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.76 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 1.13 | 1.09 | 1.02 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.80 | 2.03 | 1.53 | 1.47 | 1.53 | 1.72 | 1.69 | 1.76 | 1.65 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 36.82 | 38.98 | 40.39 | 33.31 | 33.52 | 38.31 | 30.49 | 44.97 | 39.67 | 43.06 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.3% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 279.1% | 279.1% | — | 242.8% | 91.9% | 35.1% | 26.2% | 73.5% | 34.1% | 49.3% | 38.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.9% | 0.6% | — | 1.0% | 1.4% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 1.0% | 2.6% | 2.1% | 3.5% |
| FCF Yield | 3.8% | 4.6% | 2.3% | 3.8% | — | 2.2% | 2.6% | 2.4% | 2.6% | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.4% | 2.5% | 0.6% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 1.4% | 1.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 2.0% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 1.7% | 3.4% | 1.3% | 2.0% | 3.2% | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $365M | $360M | $361M | $361M | $365M | $368M | $367M | $370M | $376M | $373M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EL stock.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 109.5x. The historical average is 43.1x. This places it at the 97th percentile of its historical range.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 17.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.5x.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 4.7%. The historical average is 23.5%.
Based on historical data, The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is trading at a P/E of 109.5x. This is at the 97th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.27% with a payout ratio of 279.1%.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. has 75.5% gross margin and 11.1% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage constrains financial flexibility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price in Recovery Already
Based on EL's reported figures, the trailing P/E of 215.30 and EV/EBITDA of 52.51 reflect depressed trailing earnings, while the forward P/E of 32.40 and forward EV/EBITDA of 14.56 imply the market is capitalizing a sharp earnings rebound.
The gap between trailing and forward multiples suggests trailing earnings are largely distorted by impairment and restructuring charges rather than representing normal earning power. Against a forward P/E of 32.40, the stock still embeds a meaningful growth expectation, which investors should weigh against the peer set where ELF trades at 249.66 trailing and IPAR at 25.82. The 10.32 price-to-book ratio, far above IFF's 1.56 and COTY's 1.12, indicates that much of the valuation rests on brand intangibles rather than tangible asset backing.
Margin Volatility Masks Underlying Earning Power
As reported in the quarterly ratio data, EL's gross margin held between 71% and 81% while operating margin swung from -14.5% to 13.9%, indicating that cost absorption rather than pricing drives earnings swings.
The stable gross margin points to a durable pricing position in prestige beauty, so the volatility in operating margin likely reflects fixed-cost deleverage when volumes soften. The most recent quarter's 6.3% net margin and 11.0% operating margin appear to show partial recovery, but a single quarter cannot establish whether the operating margin can sustain above 10% across seasonal cycles. Net margin trails operating margin in several periods, which warrants investigation into non-operating and tax items before treating reported net income as a clean signal of earnings quality.
Returns Oscillate Without Clear Compounding
According to the supplied ratio history, EL's ROIC moved between -3.7% and 3.8% over ten quarters while the latest reading of 3.3% remains far below the 18.6% achieved by Inter Parfums, suggesting returns on invested capital are not yet compounding.
ROIC and ROE have oscillated around zero, implying that the large invested capital base, including goodwill and acquired brands, is not generating consistent excess returns. The latest quarterly recovery appears to be driven by margin improvement rather than capital efficiency, since asset turnover has held near 0.18 to 0.22 throughout. Investors should monitor whether ROIC can hold above the cost of capital for several consecutive quarters before concluding that the acquisition strategy is creating durable value.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthened Then Partly Eased
Based on EL's reported quarterly figures, the cash conversion cycle ranged from 93 to 143 days, with the latest reading of 98 days showing improvement from the 143-day peak in 2025Q1 but remaining elevated.
Inventory days are the dominant driver, ranging from 160 to 258 days, which suggests substantial inventory build relative to cost of goods sold and raises obsolescence exposure in fast-rotating makeup SKUs. Payables days of 108 to 211 provide meaningful supplier financing that partly offsets this, but the reliance on supplier terms may be less secure if vendors tighten credit. The modest improvement in the latest quarter appears encouraging, though inventory days remain high enough to warrant continued monitoring.
Elevated Debt Narrows Financial Flexibility
As reported in the quarterly balance sheet ratios, EL's debt-to-equity ratio ranged from 1.85 to 2.74 while interest coverage swung from negative to above 25 times, indicating leverage remains high and coverage is highly sensitive to earnings timing.
Debt-to-equity has stayed well above peer levels, with IFF at 0.47 and IPAR at 0.20, which suggests the thinning equity base magnifies the burden of carrying around $8.3B to $11.0B in total debt. Interest coverage turned negative in several quarters, implying that debt service depended on earnings recovery rather than stable operating cash generation. The debt-to-EBITDA ratio ranging from 14 to over 100 times in some periods suggests refinancing and covenant headroom deserve careful scrutiny, though the full lease obligation picture would need verification.
Adequate Current Ratio Thin Under Stress
Based on reported figures, EL's current ratio held between 1.22 and 1.41 and quick ratio between 0.90 and 1.02, suggesting near-term liquidity is serviceable but leans on inventory conversion.
The quick ratio sitting near 0.90 to 1.00 indicates that excluding inventory, current assets roughly cover current liabilities, which is adequate but leaves limited cushion. Given inventory days above 150, a severe demand shock could slow the conversion of stock to cash and pressure the buffer. The position appears workable under normal conditions, but investors should monitor whether liquidity holds if operating cash flow remains volatile across the coming quarters.
Asset-Light Multiples Misread Brand-Heavy Balance Sheet
The price-to-book ratio of 10.32 is most commonly misapplied to EL's model, because the book value is dominated by acquired intangibles and goodwill rather than tangible assets that can be liquidated.
Investors often treat price-to-book as a valuation floor, yet for a prestige brand owner whose value resides in brand equity and goodwill, book value substantially understates or misrepresents economic worth. A more informative approach would pair EV/EBITDA on a normalized, impairment-adjusted basis with return on tangible capital, which isolates the operating return on brands the company must continually fund through advertising. This adjustment would better reflect whether the acquisition-driven asset base is earning its cost.