Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 65.2x · EV/EBITDA 40.9x · ROE 14.4%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $34.8B | $27.1B | $11.5B | $9.5B | $7.3B | $7.7B | $5.8B | $6.8B | $4.9B | $5.7B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $35.1B | $27.4B | $12.6B | $10.8B | $8.4B | $8.9B | $6.7B | $7.8B | $5.5B | $6.0B | $4.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 65.19 | 50.72 | 35.94 | 44.24 | 27.80 | 27.04 | 22.71 | 28.93 | 23.61 | 23.84 | 18.39 |
| P/S Ratio | 4.38 | 3.41 | 1.69 | 1.59 | 1.33 | 1.46 | 1.24 | 1.51 | 1.32 | 1.69 | 1.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 8.43 | 6.56 | 3.52 | 3.25 | 2.65 | 3.03 | 2.59 | 3.15 | 2.63 | 3.32 | 2.78 |
| P/FCF | 58.13 | 45.30 | 36.11 | — | 209.20 | 33.77 | 39.44 | — | 54.60 | — | 51.99 |
| P/OCF | 41.29 | 32.17 | 21.58 | 83.63 | 30.46 | 18.49 | 20.74 | — | 25.46 | 56.53 | 20.94 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.46 | 1.85 | 1.80 | 1.52 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 1.73 | 1.48 | 1.77 | 1.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | 40.90 | 31.95 | 18.92 | 20.44 | 16.00 | 15.91 | 14.27 | 17.03 | 13.30 | 13.67 | 10.62 |
| EV / EBIT | 51.10 | 43.31 | 26.65 | 33.29 | 25.13 | 21.84 | 23.47 | 28.46 | 20.58 | 19.83 | 15.51 |
| EV / FCF | — | 45.85 | 39.56 | — | 239.93 | 39.01 | 45.75 | — | 61.17 | — | 54.17 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 24.4% | 24.4% | 24.0% | 24.8% | 24.9% | 25.7% | 25.0% | 25.2% | 26.5% | 29.7% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 8.7% | 7.5% | 6.1% | 6.6% | 7.7% | 7.0% | 7.1% | 7.9% | 9.6% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 4.7% | 3.6% | 5.0% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 5.1% | 5.6% | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.4% | 14.4% | 10.3% | 7.6% | 10.4% | 11.5% | 10.8% | 11.4% | 11.6% | 14.6% | 16.0% |
| ROA | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3.1% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 3.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | 3.7% | 5.3% | 5.6% |
| ROIC | 11.7% | 11.7% | 8.9% | 6.8% | 7.2% | 8.8% | 7.7% | 8.6% | 9.9% | 13.0% | 13.6% |
| ROCE | 11.1% | 11.1% | 9.6% | 7.4% | 7.1% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 8.4% | 9.5% | 12.8% | 12.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 1.12 | 1.12 | 2.05 | 2.78 | 2.45 | 2.60 | 2.56 | 2.69 | 1.93 | 1.02 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.08 | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.38 | 0.38 | 1.65 | 2.41 | 2.05 | 2.14 | 1.97 | 2.21 | 1.43 | 0.66 | 0.43 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.55 | 3.46 | — | 30.74 | 5.24 | 6.30 | — | 6.57 | — | 2.18 |
| Interest Coverage | 13.41 | 13.41 | 3.58 | 4.23 | 6.50 | 21.57 | 4.01 | 6.93 | 8.10 | 11.92 | 12.76 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.18 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.25 | 1.27 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.87 | 1.95 | 2.13 | 2.35 | 2.66 | 2.76 | 2.37 | 2.63 | 2.73 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 164.24 | 166.23 | 172.10 | 180.03 | 191.55 | 197.24 | 167.41 | 169.73 | 183.91 | 145.91 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 22.6% | 22.6% | 27.7% | 41.5% | 31.5% | 28.9% | 32.9% | 27.5% | 36.4% | 31.5% | 28.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.8% | 2.3% | 3.6% | 3.7% | 4.4% | 3.5% | 4.2% | 4.2% | 5.4% |
| FCF Yield | 1.7% | 2.2% | 2.8% | — | 0.5% | 3.0% | 2.5% | — | 1.8% | — | 1.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.9% | 1.5% | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $47M | $45M | $45M | $45M | $44M | $44M | $44M | $43M | $43M | $43M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ESLT stock.
Elbit Systems Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 65.2x. The historical average is 21.3x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Elbit Systems Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 40.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 12.7x.
Elbit Systems Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.4%. The historical average is 14.0%.
Based on historical data, Elbit Systems Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 65.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Elbit Systems Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 0.35% with a payout ratio of 22.6%.
Elbit Systems Ltd. has 24.4% gross margin and 8.7% operating margin.
Elbit Systems Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Working capital volatility masking true cash generation
Premium Valuation vs. Peers Requires Execution
Elbit's current P/E of 63.92 and EV/EBITDA of 40.11 represent a substantial premium to U.S. peers like L3Harris (28.79 P/E, 16.57 EV/EBITDA), pricing in exceptional growth that must be sustained to justify the multiple.
The significant valuation premium versus sector giants suggests the market is pricing in a combination of superior revenue growth (16.3% YoY) and the strategic 'battle-test' advantage derived from its relationship with the IDF. However, with a PEG of 4.38, the implied growth rate is already high, leaving little room for execution missteps in converting the $23.8B backlog. The valuation appears to embed expectations for permanent margin expansion beyond current levels, which would be required to bring the P/FCF of 57.00 closer to peers.
Gross Margin Expansion Contrasts with Peers
Elbit's gross margin has expanded from a 24.0% floor to above 25% as of Q2 2026, but its operating margin of 9.6% still trails U.S. peers like L3Harris, indicating R&D reinvestment and global subsidiary costs may be limiting the translation to bottom-line profitability.
The 130 basis point expansion in gross margin over ten quarters is a positive structural shift, potentially reflecting scale benefits from the backlog conversion or a favorable product mix. However, the operating margin remains below the 10% threshold, contrasting with L3Harris's higher profitability profile. This divergence suggests that while top-line efficiency is improving, the cost base associated with maintaining a global R&D and production footprint continues to weigh on overall earnings power.
ROIC Inflection Lags Profitability Uptick
Return on Invested Capital has improved from 1.8% in Q1 2024 to 3.3% in Q2 2026, but this modest level suggests the significant expansion in the asset base is only beginning to generate incremental returns.
The steady but low ROIC figure is a critical counterpoint to the strong revenue growth narrative. The expansion in total assets from $10.2B to $13.9B has temporarily diluted capital efficiency, as the new capacity and working capital are not yet fully productive. For investors, the key metric to watch is the convergence of ROIC toward the cost of capital, which would signal that the massive backlog is translating into genuine economic value creation rather than just accounting growth.
Deleveraging Enhances Financial Flexibility
The debt-to-equity ratio has been halved from 0.52 in Q1 2024 to 0.19 in Q2 2026, and interest coverage has surged to 9.92x, indicating the company is using strong cash flow to fortify its balance sheet.
This aggressive deleveraging, with debt reduced by approximately $650 million over two years, appears strategically timed to provide resilience amid geopolitical uncertainty and to fund organic growth from internal cash generation. The improved interest coverage to nearly 10x makes the debt service highly comfortable and removes any near-term refinancing risk. This conservative posture provides significant 'dry powder' for future strategic M&A or for cushioning any potential project delays.
Cash Conversion Cycle Shows Project-Based Strain
The Cash Conversion Cycle expanded to 251 days in Q2 2026 from 262 days in early 2024, but the high figure is structurally driven by long Days Sales Outstanding (165 days) and Days Inventory Outstanding (173 days) typical of complex defense integration projects.
The lengthy CCC is not a signal of operational inefficiency but rather a reflection of the project-based revenue recognition and inventory-heavy production model. The reduction in DPO from 93 to 87 days suggests the company may be paying suppliers slightly faster, possibly to secure critical components in a tight supply chain environment. Investors should view this cycle in the context of the growing deferred revenue balance, which represents pre-paid performance obligations that fund operations and partially offset the capital tied up in working capital.
The Liquidity Illusion of Deferred Revenue
The single most misapplied ratio is the current ratio of 1.39, which appears healthy but is significantly inflated by $4.3 billion in deferred revenue, masking the true operational liquidity available to fund day-to-day obligations.
The current ratio is a standard screen for short-term health, but for a defense contractor like Elbit, the massive deferred revenue liability represents future performance obligations to customers, not available cash. Stripping out this component reveals a more constrained liquidity position, which is why the quick ratio of 0.89 is a more appropriate metric. Analysts should focus on operating cash flow generation and the availability of the $1.2B in cash and equivalents rather than headline current ratio figures when assessing financial flexibility.