Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 48.5x · EV/EBITDA 27.3x · ROE 10.5%. (1999–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $51.1B | $49.9B | $44.4B | $46.5B | $46.6B | $81.8B | $57.6B | $49.5B | $32.7B | $24.3B | $20.4B |
| Enterprise Value | $48.9B | $47.7B | $42.0B | $46.0B | $46.5B | $81.6B | $57.2B | $49.0B | $32.6B | $24.6B | $20.3B |
| P/E Ratio → | 48.51 | 46.58 | 10.62 | 33.15 | 30.58 | 54.43 | 70.18 | 47.42 | 45.18 | 39.14 | 35.90 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.43 | 8.23 | 8.16 | 9.27 | 8.65 | 15.63 | 13.14 | 11.39 | 8.79 | 7.08 | 6.89 |
| P/B Ratio | 5.03 | 4.83 | 4.41 | 6.92 | 8.02 | 14.01 | 12.60 | 11.93 | 10.42 | 8.13 | 7.79 |
| P/FCF | 38.29 | 37.41 | 153.04 | 73.82 | 48.85 | 58.31 | 89.10 | 54.94 | 47.76 | 29.49 | 41.91 |
| P/OCF | 32.05 | 31.31 | 81.81 | 51.87 | 38.23 | 47.21 | 54.68 | 41.97 | 35.30 | 24.32 | 28.97 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 7.86 | 7.73 | 9.19 | 8.64 | 15.59 | 13.03 | 11.27 | 8.76 | 7.15 | 6.85 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.27 | 26.61 | 27.39 | 29.27 | 24.87 | 46.01 | 39.93 | 37.34 | 27.87 | 22.48 | 22.89 |
| EV / EBIT | 29.88 | 37.48 | 26.80 | 33.11 | 25.92 | 47.25 | 60.88 | 41.05 | 41.01 | 23.20 | 26.86 |
| EV / FCF | — | 35.74 | 144.95 | 73.10 | 48.77 | 58.19 | 88.35 | 54.39 | 47.58 | 29.75 | 41.68 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 78.1% | 78.1% | 79.5% | 79.3% | 78.3% | 76.6% | 74.9% | 73.4% | 75.2% | 74.3% | 72.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.0% | 27.0% | 25.3% | 28.5% | 31.6% | 30.8% | 29.5% | 27.6% | 29.3% | 29.4% | 27.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | 17.7% | 17.7% | 76.7% | 28.0% | 28.3% | 28.7% | 18.8% | 24.1% | 19.4% | 18.1% | 19.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 10.5% | 10.5% | 49.8% | 22.4% | 26.1% | 28.9% | 18.9% | 28.7% | 23.5% | 22.2% | 22.2% |
| ROA | 8.0% | 8.0% | 37.2% | 15.9% | 18.1% | 19.1% | 12.0% | 17.7% | 13.1% | 12.2% | 13.3% |
| ROIC | 15.5% | 15.5% | 14.8% | 17.8% | 22.4% | 24.8% | 25.1% | 26.9% | 26.3% | 26.5% | 25.0% |
| ROCE | 14.0% | 14.0% | 14.0% | 18.5% | 23.1% | 23.3% | 21.7% | 23.9% | 25.0% | 24.4% | 21.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.31 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.22 | -0.23 | -0.07 | -0.01 | -0.03 | -0.11 | -0.12 | -0.04 | 0.07 | -0.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -1.25 | -1.25 | -1.53 | -0.28 | -0.04 | -0.10 | -0.34 | -0.38 | -0.10 | 0.20 | -0.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | -1.67 | -8.09 | -0.71 | -0.08 | -0.12 | -0.75 | -0.56 | -0.18 | 0.26 | -0.22 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | 79.19 | 78.98 | 68.46 | 69.63 | 42.29 | 43.73 | 23.80 | 45.61 | 41.99 |
Net cash position: cash ($2.9B) exceeds total debt ($705M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.72 | 3.72 | 4.18 | 3.38 | 3.03 | 3.08 | 3.46 | 3.31 | 2.61 | 1.81 | 4.21 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.09 | 3.09 | 3.45 | 2.62 | 2.17 | 2.38 | 2.56 | 2.60 | 1.92 | 1.41 | 3.46 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.33 | 2.33 | 2.64 | 1.37 | 1.19 | 1.42 | 1.57 | 1.68 | 1.09 | 0.96 | 2.39 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 0.61 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.60 | 0.66 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.03 | 1.15 | 1.33 | 1.69 | 1.37 | 1.80 | 1.52 | 1.59 | 2.03 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 54.87 | 48.81 | 60.33 | 47.41 | 46.38 | 50.16 | 50.29 | 52.68 | 50.93 | 51.06 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.1% | 2.1% | 9.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | 1.8% | 1.4% | 2.1% | 2.2% | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| FCF Yield | 2.6% | 2.7% | 0.7% | 1.4% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.8% | 2.1% | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.7% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 3.7% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.7% | 1.8% | 2.6% | 1.9% | 3.7% | 0.6% | 1.1% | 0.5% | 2.4% | 3.1% | 3.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $586M | $599M | $609M | $624M | $631M | $632M | $637M | $641M | $648M | $653M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 27 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying EW stock.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's current P/E ratio is 48.5x. The historical average is 33.7x. This places it at the 91th percentile of its historical range.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 27.3x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 22.6x.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 10.5%. The historical average is 17.7%.
Based on historical data, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation is trading at a P/E of 48.5x. This is at the 91th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation has 78.1% gross margin and 27.0% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
TMTT ramp and pricing pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiple Reflects Pure-Play Status
According to the latest market data, EW trades at 49.1x trailing earnings and 27.6x EV/EBITDA, a substantial premium to diversified peers like MDT (24.8x P/E) and BSX (25.5x P/E).
The premium appears justified by EW's pure-play structural heart focus and faster growth trajectory, but the forward P/E of 29.9x implies the market expects sustained double-digit growth. With a PEG of 6.93, the valuation suggests that near-term growth is already priced in, leaving little room for disappointment. Investors should monitor whether TMTT adoption can deliver the growth required to support this multiple.
Margin Resilience Amid Mix Shift
Gross margin has held near 78% for ten quarters, while operating margin expanded from 22.6% in 2024Q4 to 29.8% in 2026Q2, as per the quarterly ratio data.
The stability of gross margin despite the dilutive TMTT mix suggests strong pricing power in TAVR and efficient manufacturing. Operating margin recovery indicates operating leverage, but the 2025Q4 dip to 23.6% highlights volatility from SG&A and R&D investments. Net margin swings (5.8% to 27.8%) are driven by non-operating items, so operating margin is the better gauge of core earning power.
ROIC Stable but Below Peer Efficiency
ROIC has remained in a narrow 3.3% to 4.6% range over the past ten quarters, as reported in the quarterly data, while peers like ABT and SYK post ROICs above 10%.
The low ROIC appears to be a function of the company's large cash balance and heavy R&D spending, which depress returns on invested capital despite high margins. The 2024Q3 ROE spike to 35.9% was likely due to a one-time gain, as subsequent quarters reverted to single digits. This suggests that EW is not yet compounding returns efficiently, but the fortress balance sheet provides flexibility for future value creation.
Working Capital Swings Reflect Consignment Model
Cash conversion cycle lengthened from 328 days in 2024Q1 to 267 days in 2026Q2, with DIO elevated near 262 days, based on the quarterly ratio data.
The extended DIO reflects consignment inventory at hospitals, a standard practice in medtech that ties up cash but supports revenue recognition. CCC volatility (ranging from 267 to 366 days) indicates that working capital swings are driven by hospital stocking patterns rather than operational inefficiency. Asset turnover remains low at 0.13, consistent with an asset-light, high-margin model.
Minimal Debt Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.07 with D/EBITDA at 1.36, as per the latest quarterly data, indicating a fortress balance sheet that can self-fund growth initiatives.
With total debt near $700M and cash at $2.9B, EW has ample capacity to fund the TMTT ramp and potential acquisitions without straining its balance sheet. Interest coverage data is unavailable, but the low leverage suggests debt service is not a concern. The upcoming Critical Care divestiture for $4.2B will further strengthen the cash position, though it increases concentration risk in structural heart.
Ample Liquidity Buffers Against Shocks
Current ratio improved to 4.52 in 2026Q2 from 3.75 in 2024Q1, with quick ratio at 3.77, as reported in the quarterly data, indicating a strong liquidity position.
The high current and quick ratios suggest that EW can easily cover short-term obligations even under severe stress, such as a prolonged procedure volume downturn. The substantial cash balance provides a cushion against reimbursement cuts or competitive pricing pressure. However, the reliance on consignment inventory means that a sudden drop in procedures could leave EW with excess inventory, but the liquidity buffer mitigates this risk.
Valuation Gap vs. Diversified Peers
EW's P/E of 49.1x and EV/EBITDA of 27.6x are significantly higher than MDT (24.8x, 15.3x) and BSX (25.5x, 15.7x), as per the peer comparison data.
The premium reflects EW's pure-play status and higher growth potential, but it also implies that any growth deceleration could trigger a de-rating. EW's net margin of 13.9% is comparable to peers, but its ROE of 2.3% is far below the peer average, likely due to its large cash position and lower leverage. The gap in ROE may narrow as EW deploys cash into growth initiatives or returns capital to shareholders.
Misapplied ROE in a Cash-Rich Model
ROE is often misapplied to EW because its fortress balance sheet and large cash holdings depress the metric, as seen in the 2.3% ROE for 2026Q2.
ROE understates EW's true economic returns because it penalizes the company for holding cash and using minimal leverage. A more appropriate metric is ROIC excluding excess cash, which would better reflect the profitability of its operating assets. Alternatively, investors should focus on operating margin and FCF margin, which are more indicative of the company's earning power and cash generation ability.