Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -36.1%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $361658 | $4M | $23M | $163M | $1.2B | $4.6B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $5.7B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $20M | $24M | $37M | $161M | $1.2B | $4.6B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $5.7B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.01 | — | — | 5.34 | 5.82 | 2018.18 | 1684.22 | — | 1760.89 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.35 | 1.47 | 12.52 | 118.04 | 45.35 | 56.71 | 190.30 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 1.00 | 8.03 | 28.84 | 46.92 | 78.30 | 295.33 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 0.01 | 0.07 | — | — | 60.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 0.01 | 0.07 | — | — | 60.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.84 | 0.58 | 1.46 | 12.15 | 116.61 | 45.47 | 56.84 | 190.20 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | 26.88 | 68.99 | 920.24 | 1568.36 | 1156.84 | 1811.80 | 1827.89 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | 45.84 | 527.01 | 1827.37 | 1086.22 | — | 1842.67 | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 0.45 | — | — | 58.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 2.9% | 2.9% | 6.0% | 3.9% | 5.5% | 13.0% | 16.5% | 17.6% | 17.0% | 17.0% | 16.1% |
| Operating Margin | -168.9% | -168.9% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.9% | 7.3% | 3.7% | 3.0% | 10.3% | 13.0% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -189.8% | -189.8% | -7.3% | 2.3% | 2.2% | 6.0% | 2.7% | -1.0% | 10.8% | 12.3% | 11.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -36.1% | -36.1% | -2.8% | 1.6% | 1.4% | 2.5% | 3.2% | -1.5% | 21.6% | 36.5% | 52.3% |
| ROA | -31.8% | -31.8% | -2.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | 2.3% | 2.4% | -1.2% | 17.9% | 24.3% | 20.9% |
| ROIC | -21.6% | -21.6% | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 3.2% | 17.3% | 24.1% | 23.9% |
| ROCE | -30.1% | -30.1% | 0.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% | 3.0% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 19.8% | 37.3% | 60.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.54 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 10.87 | 4.74 | 3.47 | 1.05 | 3.43 | 4.47 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 1.37 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.16 | 0.09 | -0.01 | -0.24 | -0.35 | 0.12 | 0.19 | -0.15 | -0.03 | 0.54 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | 10.52 | -0.74 | -27.95 | -19.23 | 3.03 | 4.33 | -0.91 | -0.08 | 1.35 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.38 | — | — | -1.77 | — | — | — | — | -0.14 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -66.27 | -66.27 | -1.68 | 1.50 | 12.55 | 33.94 | 1.00 | -0.06 | 19.93 | 16.66 | 11.29 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 9.35 | 9.35 | 16.10 | 14.76 | 18.49 | 37.46 | 4.42 | 3.65 | 9.60 | 5.43 | 2.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 9.20 | 9.20 | 15.55 | 14.40 | 18.40 | 37.12 | 4.41 | 3.47 | 8.79 | 4.80 | 1.98 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 1.19 | 9.21 | 14.96 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 2.22 | 1.02 | 0.01 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.19 | 0.34 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.24 | 0.79 | 1.01 | 1.35 | 1.93 | 1.58 |
| Inventory Turnover | 17.59 | 17.59 | 10.97 | 27.19 | 130.92 | 24.92 | 203.43 | 17.42 | 13.69 | 13.91 | 11.79 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 575.47 | 186.52 | 81.98 | 100.73 | 227.35 | 126.96 | 163.64 | 105.30 | 70.42 | 132.31 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | 18.7% | 17.2% | 0.0% | 0.1% | — | 0.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 100.0% | 1472.4% | — | — | 1.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $2M | $7M | $8M | $23M | $4M | $649794 | $467150 | $446947 | $467200 | $467200 |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
Based on reported figures, Farmmi trades at a P/S multiple of 0.06, which, according to recent SEC filings, suggests the market is pricing the entity as a distressed asset rather than a going concern, given the absence of positive earnings and the precipitous decline in revenue.
The current valuation multiples, including a P/B of 0.02, indicate that investors have largely abandoned expectations of future growth or asset-based recovery. This pricing appears to reflect a deep skepticism regarding the company's ability to pivot its business model or leverage its existing infrastructure to generate meaningful shareholder value.
As reported in financial statements, the company's gross margin has deteriorated to -0.1%, a trend that, when combined with an operating margin of -168.91%, suggests the core business model is fundamentally unable to cover its fixed administrative costs in the current competitive environment.
The shift from positive margins in earlier periods to the current negative profile implies that the company has lost its ability to pass through procurement costs to customers. This lack of pricing power, coupled with high overhead, suggests that the current operating structure is unsustainable without a radical reduction in fixed costs.
According to recent quarterly data, the cash conversion cycle has expanded to 200 days, which, based on reported figures, highlights significant inefficiencies in inventory management and customer collection that further strain the company's already limited liquidity position.
The sharp increase in the cash conversion cycle suggests that capital is being trapped in inventory or uncollected receivables for extended periods. This inefficiency is particularly damaging given the company's reliance on a thin cash buffer, as it forces the business to rely on external financing to fund basic operations.
Based on the most recent balance sheet, cash reserves have dwindled to approximately $804,000, a figure that, as noted in recent filings, leaves the company highly vulnerable to even minor operational disruptions or further delays in the collection of trade receivables.
While the current ratio remains elevated due to accounting entries, the actual cash position is insufficient to support the current rate of cash burn. This suggests that the company may face an imminent need for dilutive capital raises or a restructuring of its debt obligations to maintain basic solvency.
Investors frequently misapply the Price-to-Book ratio to Farmmi, which, according to historical data, obscures the reality that the company's assets are largely illiquid or subject to rapid depreciation, rendering book value a poor proxy for the firm's actual liquidation value or future earning potential.
Relying on P/B ignores the fact that the company's primary value lies in its operational cash flow, which is currently negative. A more appropriate focus would be on the cash burn rate and the sustainability of the current revenue base, as these metrics provide a clearer picture of the company's survival risk.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FAMI stock.
Farmmi, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 5.6x.
Farmmi, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -36.1%. The historical average is 11.6%.
Based on historical data, Farmmi, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Farmmi, Inc. has 2.9% gross margin and -168.9% operating margin.