Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 15.8x · EV/EBITDA 8.5x · ROE 12.4%. (2009–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.7B | $6.2B | $8.7B | $9.7B | $7.5B | $12.7B | $10.3B | $7.9B | $4.8B | $9.1B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise Value | $6.9B | $8.5B | $11.1B | $12.2B | $9.6B | $15.1B | $12.6B | $9.8B | $6.8B | $10.3B | $8.4B |
| P/E Ratio → | 15.80 | 20.80 | 18.46 | 24.02 | 10.92 | 16.49 | 18.59 | 18.25 | 12.21 | 19.18 | 17.51 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.04 | 1.39 | 1.89 | 2.10 | 1.59 | 2.65 | 2.84 | 1.37 | 0.87 | 1.72 | 1.45 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.98 | 2.61 | 3.59 | 4.24 | 3.60 | 4.16 | 3.70 | 3.25 | 2.18 | 3.50 | 3.05 |
| P/FCF | 12.69 | 16.97 | 18.34 | 12.16 | 23.42 | 26.86 | 15.21 | 15.61 | 10.47 | 20.93 | 14.27 |
| P/OCF | 9.73 | 13.01 | 13.03 | 9.21 | 13.24 | 18.51 | 12.44 | 12.38 | 7.87 | 15.18 | 11.08 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.91 | 2.42 | 2.63 | 2.04 | 3.15 | 3.47 | 1.70 | 1.24 | 1.95 | 1.68 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.50 | 10.43 | 11.97 | 15.53 | 9.96 | 15.13 | 17.18 | 11.54 | 9.16 | 12.67 | 11.32 |
| EV / EBIT | 11.16 | 16.35 | 15.35 | 19.18 | 12.24 | 18.67 | 21.55 | 14.68 | 11.16 | 15.05 | 13.29 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.19 | 23.49 | 15.23 | 30.06 | 31.90 | 18.61 | 19.44 | 15.04 | 23.66 | 16.61 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.6% | 44.6% | 44.8% | 41.3% | 40.9% | 40.8% | 40.4% | 35.6% | 35.7% | 36.4% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 13.9% | 16.0% | 13.3% | 16.4% | 16.9% | 15.7% | 12.1% | 10.9% | 12.9% | 12.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | 6.7% | 6.7% | 10.2% | 8.7% | 14.5% | 16.1% | 15.3% | 7.5% | 7.1% | 8.9% | 8.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 12.4% | 12.4% | 20.0% | 18.5% | 26.7% | 26.5% | 21.3% | 18.7% | 16.3% | 19.0% | 17.2% |
| ROA | 4.6% | 4.6% | 7.2% | 6.4% | 9.8% | 10.1% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 6.8% | 8.9% | 8.3% |
| ROIC | 9.8% | 9.8% | 11.5% | 10.3% | 12.0% | 11.6% | 9.0% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 14.0% | 13.4% |
| ROCE | 11.9% | 11.9% | 14.3% | 12.4% | 14.7% | 13.5% | 10.4% | 14.9% | 13.1% | 15.4% | 14.7% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.17 | 1.23 | 1.33 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.07 | 0.58 | 0.61 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.03 | 3.59 | 2.87 | 2.82 | 3.71 | 2.73 | 3.13 | 1.85 | 1.93 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.95 | 1.01 | 1.07 | 1.02 | 0.78 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 0.46 | 0.50 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.80 | 2.80 | 2.63 | 3.12 | 2.20 | 2.39 | 3.14 | 2.27 | 2.78 | 1.46 | 1.59 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.22 | 5.15 | 3.06 | 6.64 | 5.04 | 3.40 | 3.83 | 4.56 | 2.72 | 2.34 |
| Interest Coverage | 4.52 | 4.52 | 5.45 | 5.45 | 6.60 | 9.62 | 6.96 | 7.11 | 8.21 | 13.85 | 12.86 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.84 | 1.84 | 1.25 | 1.70 | 1.59 | 1.39 | 1.64 | 1.35 | 1.13 | 1.77 | 1.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.65 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 1.13 | 1.08 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.36 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.77 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| Inventory Turnover | 2.41 | 2.41 | 2.65 | 2.76 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 2.49 | 5.17 | 5.19 | 5.78 | 6.00 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 41.96 | 40.74 | 42.15 | 40.33 | 44.12 | 74.07 | 39.56 | 38.04 | 38.36 | 40.32 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 1.1% | 1.3% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Payout Ratio | 40.4% | 40.4% | 25.3% | 28.9% | 21.2% | 18.5% | 24.1% | 28.5% | 29.6% | 23.3% | 23.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.3% | 4.8% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 9.2% | 6.1% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 5.2% | 5.7% |
| FCF Yield | 7.9% | 5.9% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 4.3% | 3.7% | 6.6% | 6.4% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 7.0% |
| Buyback Yield | 5.3% | 4.0% | 2.8% | 1.5% | 7.7% | 3.5% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 14.6% | 2.4% | 5.9% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 7.9% | 5.9% | 4.1% | 2.7% | 9.7% | 4.6% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 17.0% | 3.6% | 7.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $121M | $126M | $128M | $131M | $140M | $140M | $141M | $146M | $156M | $158M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 17 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FBIN stock.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 15.8x. The historical average is 21.8x. This places it at the 14th percentile of its historical range.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.2x.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 12.4%. The historical average is 15.2%.
Based on historical data, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 15.8x. This is at the 14th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 2.55% with a payout ratio of 40.4%.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. has 44.6% gross margin and 13.9% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Revenue decline and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Resilience Masks Operating Strain
Gross margin expanded to 51.2% in Q2 2026 from 45.1% a year earlier, yet operating margin collapsed to -0.8%, per reported financials, indicating cost pressures beyond input costs.
The gross margin improvement suggests favorable mix or pricing, but the operating loss of -$9.0M in Q2 2026, versus a $171.6M profit in Q2 2025, reveals that SG&A and other operating costs are absorbing the gains. This divergence implies that the company's cost structure is not flexing with revenue declines, and the operating leverage is working against it. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin strength is sustainable or if it reflects one-time benefits, as the operating margin deterioration is more indicative of underlying earning power.
Return on Capital Decays Amid Revenue Slide
ROIC fell to -0.1% in Q2 2026 from 3.0% a year earlier, while ROE turned negative at -1.0%, according to the latest quarterly data, signaling a sharp erosion in capital efficiency.
The decline in ROIC and ROE is driven by both margin compression and a shrinking asset base, as total assets fell from $6.8B to $6.3B over the period. The negative ROIC in Q2 2026 suggests that the company is not generating sufficient operating income to cover its cost of capital, which may indicate a cyclical trough or structural issues. The improvement in gross margin to 51.2% has not translated into returns, implying that the company's invested capital is becoming less productive, and investors should assess whether this is a temporary downturn or a longer-term trend.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens as Inventory Builds
Cash conversion cycle extended to 128 days in Q2 2026 from 112 days a year earlier, driven by a rise in days inventory outstanding to 164, per the ratio data, indicating slower inventory turnover.
The increase in DIO from 139 to 164 days over the past year suggests that inventory is accumulating relative to sales, which may reflect weakening demand or deliberate stockpiling ahead of expected price increases. Meanwhile, DSO remained relatively stable at 47 days, and DPO rose slightly to 83 days, but the net effect is a longer cash conversion cycle that ties up working capital. This trend is concerning because it consumes cash and may signal that the company is struggling to align production with demand, potentially leading to future write-downs or discounting.
Leverage Creeps Higher as Interest Coverage Falters
Debt-to-EBITDA rose to 35.35 in Q2 2026 from 13.48 a year earlier, while interest coverage turned negative at -0.31, per the latest data, indicating a severe strain on debt servicing capacity.
The dramatic increase in D/EBITDA is primarily due to the collapse in EBITDA, as operating income turned negative, rather than a significant increase in debt. Interest coverage of -0.31 means that operating income is insufficient to cover interest expenses, which is a red flag for creditors. However, the company still generated $202.8M in operating cash flow in Q2 2026, suggesting that cash-based coverage may be better than accrual-based metrics imply. Investors should monitor whether the operating loss is a one-off or a trend, as sustained negative interest coverage could lead to covenant breaches or refinancing difficulties.
Liquidity Buffer Adequate but Cash Position Thins
Current ratio improved to 2.01 in Q2 2026 from 1.97 a year earlier, but cash fell to $209.7M from $359.7M in Q1 2024, per balance sheet data, indicating a tighter cash cushion.
The current ratio of 2.01 suggests that short-term assets comfortably cover short-term liabilities, but the quick ratio of 1.05 indicates that inventory is a significant component of current assets. The decline in cash reserves over the past two years, coupled with negative operating income, raises concerns about the company's ability to weather a prolonged downturn without drawing on debt or cutting dividends. The company continued to pay dividends and repurchase shares in Q2 2026 despite the net loss, which may be unsustainable if cash generation weakens further.
Gross Margin Misleads on True Earning Power
The most misapplied ratio for FBIN is gross margin, which at 51.2% in Q2 2026 appears robust but obscures the operating loss, per reported data, and may overstate the company's competitive position.
Gross margin is often used as a proxy for pricing power and moat strength, but for FBIN, the high gross margin does not translate into profitability due to elevated SG&A and other operating costs. The operating margin of -0.8% in Q2 2026 reveals that the company's cost structure is not aligned with its revenue base, and the gross margin may be inflated by one-time items or favorable mix. Investors should focus on operating margin and EBITDA margin as more reliable indicators of earning power, and also consider the impact of the MasterBrand spin-off on historical comparability. The gross margin alone can mislead investors into thinking the business is healthier than it actually is.