Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -2.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -49.4%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $179M | $67M | $90M | $130M | $208M | $2.9B | $7.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $113M | $1M | $-45158772 | $-34952150 | $134M | $2.9B | $7.1B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -2.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.56 | 0.64 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 0.77 | 7.60 | 32.29 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.60 | 0.60 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 4.75 | 130.24 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.01 | -0.47 | -0.23 | 0.50 | 7.75 | 31.14 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 87.5% | 87.5% | 86.0% | 89.9% | 88.6% | 93.4% | 94.6% | 95.2% | 95.8% |
| Operating Margin | -68.3% | -68.3% | -50.6% | -75.2% | -156.2% | -77.3% | -45.1% | -20.7% | -50.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -67.4% | -67.4% | -50.5% | -66.6% | -162.7% | -49.4% | -65.1% | -19.7% | -54.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -49.4% | -49.4% | -25.2% | -41.5% | -98.9% | -56.4% | -395.2% | -239.1% | -2581.8% |
| ROA | -21.1% | -21.1% | -12.5% | -19.9% | -53.4% | -28.8% | -92.8% | -72.8% | -106.7% |
| ROIC | -127.3% | -127.3% | -87.1% | -68.7% | -72.7% | -96.0% | — | — | — |
| ROCE | -33.9% | -33.9% | -14.8% | -24.9% | -56.4% | -50.8% | -78.3% | -112.4% | -161.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 1.04 | 0.49 | — | 0.52 | 14.51 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.59 | -0.78 | -0.79 | -0.27 | 0.09 | -4.63 | -0.86 | -6.43 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.61 | -3.61 | -6.25 | -34.46 | -15.55 | -168.45 | -111.43 | -8.45 | -11.68 |
Net cash position: cash ($195M) exceeds total debt ($129M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 4.60 | 6.31 | 10.14 | 5.91 | 5.77 | 3.35 | 2.43 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.20 | 1.20 | 4.60 | 6.31 | 10.14 | 5.91 | 5.77 | 3.35 | 2.43 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.08 | 1.08 | 4.13 | 6.06 | 9.90 | 5.61 | 5.55 | 2.45 | 2.21 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.36 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.81 | 3.09 | 1.95 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 50.34 | 18.70 | 14.26 | 9.71 | 12.26 | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 5.2% | 13.8% | 21.6% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 5.2% | 13.8% | 21.6% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $16M | $18M | $21M | $20M | $19M | $18M | $14M | $7M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FIRY stock.
Firy Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -2.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Firy Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -49.4%. The historical average is -129.4%.
Based on historical data, Firy Inc. is trading at a P/E of -2.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Firy Inc. has 87.5% gross margin and -68.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent operating losses and cash burn
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Negative Earnings Leave Multiples Unanchored
Based on the reported figures, SKLZ trades at a P/B of 1.19 and P/S of 1.28 while P/E is negative at -1.89, meaning conventional earnings-based valuation cannot be applied and investors are pricing the shares against book value and revenue instead.
With trailing earnings negative and no forward P/E or EV/EBITDA available, the market appears to be valuing SKLZ on balance sheet and sales multiples, which suggests investors are assigning value to the remaining equity base rather than to earning power. The P/B of 1.19 sits above the peer group, where HUYA and DOYU trade at 0.68 and 0.40, implying a premium that is difficult to reconcile with shrinking equity and negative returns. Investors should monitor whether the equity base continues to erode, as that would likely compress the book-value anchor currently supporting the price.
Gross Margin Strength Undermined by Opex
As reported in financial statements, gross margin held near 87% across most quarters, yet operating margin ranged from -136.4% in 2024Q4 to -69.6% in 2026Q2, indicating that operating expenses consume far more than the gross profit generated.
The stability of the gross margin suggests the core platform economics retain a high contribution, but this strength does not translate into earning power because SG&A and R&D overwhelm it. Net margin of -79.0% in 2026Q2 and a return on equity of -26.7% point to a business not yet covering its cost base, and the improvement from prior quarters appears modest rather than structural. True earning power would likely require a sustained cut in operating costs or a material revenue scale-up, neither of which the reported figures yet demonstrate.
Negative ROIC Signals Capital Destruction
Based on the reported figures, ROIC stood at -33.7% in 2026Q2 and has been negative in most of the ten reported quarters, with ROE at -26.7%, meaning the invested capital base is not generating returns above its cost.
Compared with its own history, the return profile has not compounded positively; the single positive quarter in 2024Q2 appears to be an outlier rather than a trend. The peer group also shows weak returns, with GFAI at -33.3% ROIC, so SKLZ is not an outlier within a healthy group, but this context does not make the negative returns acceptable on an absolute basis. Investors should monitor whether capital is being redeployed toward initiatives that can plausibly restore positive returns.
Cash Cushion Thinning Against Obligations
According to recent SEC filings, cash fell from $316.4M in 2024Q2 to $164.0M in 2026Q2 while the current ratio compressed to 1.01 from over 4.0 in 2025, leaving current assets barely covering current liabilities.
The liquidity cushion has narrowed sharply, and the drop in the current ratio from elevated levels in 2024 and 2025 to near parity suggests the margin of safety has largely been consumed. Quick and current ratios are identical because inventory is negligible for this business model, so the liquidity read depends entirely on cash and receivables. Under a severe stress scenario, continued operating burn would likely shorten the runway further, warranting close attention to the rate of cash decline.
Rising Leverage as Equity Erodes
As reported in financial statements, debt-to-equity climbed from 0.64 in 2024Q2 to 1.63 in 2026Q2 while total debt remained roughly flat near $132.6M, indicating that leverage pressure stems from equity shrinkage rather than new borrowing.
Because the debt balance has not grown, the increase in the D/E ratio reflects a shrinking denominator as accumulated losses erode equity, a dynamic that can look more alarming than the underlying debt load alone. Interest coverage is negative in most quarters, which means reported earnings do not cover interest expense and debt service depends on the cash reserve. This warrants further investigation into the debt terms and maturity profile, as the reported figures alone do not disclose refinancing conditions.
Cash Reserves Mask Operating Weakness
As reported in financial statements, SKLZ's $164.0M cash balance against $132.6M of total debt may make the balance sheet appear more resilient than the ten-quarter pattern of operating losses warrants.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for a platform business like Skillz is the current ratio or debt-to-equity taken in isolation, since a headline current ratio near 1.0 can look adequate while masking a cash base that is being consumed by operations. Price-to-book is similarly misleading here because book value is being eroded by accumulated losses, so a 1.19 P/B may overstate the cushion available to shareholders. A more useful lens is cash runway measured against quarterly operating cash burn, which investors should track alongside net cash after debt.