Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.3x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -254.6%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25M | $110M | $166M | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $17M | $103M | $171M | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.79 | 3.47 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.33 | 1.75 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.23 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 44.4% | — | — | -23.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -87.2% | -87.2% | — | — | -35.8% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -218.9% | -218.9% | — | — | -41.5% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -254.6% | -254.6% | — | — | -11.1% | -0.1% |
| ROA | -67.7% | -67.7% | -1.7% | 5.0% | -10.1% | -0.1% |
| ROIC | -68.9% | -68.9% | — | — | -7.2% | — |
| ROCE | -31.6% | -31.6% | -2.8% | -4.4% | -8.9% | -0.1% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -11.19 | -11.19 | -6.72 | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($8M) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 2.73 | 17.52 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 2.73 | 17.52 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 1.24 | 13.12 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.21 | — | — | 2.33 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $42M | $15M | $32M | $46M | $6M |
Liquidity and solvency pressure
Based on reported figures, Fold Holdings Inc trades at a P/S ratio of 0.79, which appears to reflect a market pricing that heavily discounts the company's current inability to generate positive earnings or cash flow compared to more established fintech peers like Coinbase or Robinhood.
The negative P/E of -0.30 underscores that traditional valuation metrics are currently ineffective for assessing the company's intrinsic value. Investors appear to be pricing the stock as a high-risk call option on bitcoin adoption rather than a fundamental business, which warrants caution given the lack of a clear path to profitability.
According to the provided quarterly data, Fold Holdings Inc has consistently posted negative ROIC, with a -11.8% figure in 2026Q1, indicating that the company is currently destroying shareholder capital rather than compounding it through its core rewards-based business model.
The persistent decay in returns on invested capital suggests that the company's operational costs, particularly rewards fulfillment, are not being offset by sufficient transactional revenue. This trend indicates that the current business model may be fundamentally misaligned with the capital intensity required to scale in the competitive crypto-fintech sector.
As reported in financial statements, the company's asset turnover ratio has remained stagnant at approximately 0.05 over several quarters, suggesting that the firm is struggling to generate meaningful revenue volume relative to its asset base compared to broader financial services industry benchmarks.
The low asset turnover implies that the company's infrastructure is underutilized or that its revenue-generating activities are not scaling efficiently with its current asset footprint. Investors should monitor whether this inefficiency is a temporary byproduct of early-stage growth or a structural limitation of the rewards-based interchange model.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's current ratio has deteriorated to 0.48 as of 2026Q1, indicating that current liabilities significantly outweigh liquid assets and leaving the firm with a precarious buffer against sudden shocks in its transactional business model.
This liquidity position suggests that the company is highly dependent on external financing or rapid capital raises to meet its short-term obligations. The lack of a sufficient quick ratio buffer implies that any disruption in transaction volume or bitcoin price volatility could lead to immediate solvency pressures.
The P/S ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for Fold Holdings Inc, as it obscures the high cost of rewards fulfillment and the volatility of bitcoin-denominated revenue, which may not represent true economic value in the same way as traditional fiat-based financial services revenue.
Analysts should instead focus on 'Net Revenue' after accounting for rewards costs and processing fees to better understand the company's true unit economics. Relying on gross revenue figures may lead to an overestimation of the company's scale and a misunderstanding of its underlying profitability potential.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FLD stock.
Fold Holdings Inc's current P/E ratio is -0.3x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Fold Holdings Inc's return on equity (ROE) is -254.6%. The historical average is -88.6%.
Based on historical data, Fold Holdings Inc is trading at a P/E of -0.3x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Fold Holdings Inc has 44.4% gross margin and -87.2% operating margin.