Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 40.4x · EV/EBITDA 15.0x · ROE 16.1%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $10.3B | $9.1B | $7.6B | $5.4B | $4.0B | $4.0B | $4.8B | $6.6B | $5.0B | $5.5B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $11.3B | $10.1B | $8.6B | $6.3B | $5.1B | $4.8B | $5.7B | $7.4B | $5.9B | $6.4B | $7.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 40.37 | 26.28 | 26.88 | 29.03 | 21.31 | 31.88 | 36.85 | 27.50 | 41.78 | 2106.50 | 47.57 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.19 | 1.92 | 1.67 | 1.26 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 1.30 | 1.66 | 1.30 | 1.51 | 1.58 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.67 | 4.03 | 3.71 | 2.75 | 2.17 | 2.18 | 2.74 | 3.61 | 3.01 | 3.31 | 3.77 |
| P/FCF | 67.05 | 20.89 | 22.11 | 21.04 | — | 20.52 | 19.08 | 26.39 | 46.71 | 22.15 | 41.74 |
| P/OCF | 20.36 | 17.96 | 17.90 | 16.69 | — | 16.01 | 15.55 | 20.23 | 26.15 | 17.77 | 26.17 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.13 | 1.89 | 1.46 | 1.40 | 1.37 | 1.52 | 1.89 | 1.53 | 1.75 | 1.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.99 | 14.22 | 14.35 | 12.92 | 17.78 | 12.59 | 12.33 | 13.80 | 13.86 | 17.24 | 13.84 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.41 | 16.73 | 18.94 | 21.66 | 25.20 | 25.36 | 21.94 | 19.74 | 24.97 | 19.83 | 27.46 |
| EV / FCF | — | 23.19 | 25.05 | 24.37 | — | 24.84 | 22.41 | 29.99 | 54.80 | 25.65 | 49.72 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.6% | 34.6% | 32.2% | 30.0% | 27.5% | 30.1% | 31.2% | 33.1% | 32.3% | 30.9% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 13.0% | 13.0% | 11.3% | 9.3% | 5.3% | 8.1% | 9.6% | 11.0% | 8.1% | 6.9% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.3% | 7.3% | 6.2% | 4.3% | 5.2% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 6.4% | 3.1% | 0.1% | 3.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 16.1% | 16.1% | 14.0% | 9.7% | 10.2% | 7.0% | 7.3% | 14.6% | 7.2% | 0.2% | 8.7% |
| ROA | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.3% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 2.5% | 2.5% | 5.3% | 2.5% | 0.1% | 2.9% |
| ROIC | 14.6% | 14.6% | 13.1% | 10.6% | 5.2% | 8.1% | 10.1% | 12.4% | 9.2% | 7.0% | 11.0% |
| ROCE | 14.9% | 14.9% | 13.4% | 11.2% | 5.4% | 7.3% | 9.0% | 11.8% | 8.6% | 7.0% | 11.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 1.10 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.48 | 2.48 | 2.81 | 2.88 | 5.14 | 3.90 | 4.21 | 2.90 | 3.51 | 4.24 | 2.90 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.44 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.72 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.41 | 1.41 | 1.68 | 1.76 | 3.61 | 2.19 | 1.83 | 1.66 | 2.04 | 2.35 | 2.22 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 2.30 | 2.94 | 3.32 | — | 4.32 | 3.33 | 3.60 | 8.08 | 3.49 | 7.98 |
| Interest Coverage | 7.77 | 7.77 | 6.57 | 4.34 | 4.34 | 3.32 | 4.60 | 6.86 | 4.03 | 5.40 | 4.54 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.98 | 1.88 | 1.97 | 2.11 | 2.54 | 2.25 | 2.20 | 2.06 | 1.98 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.41 | 1.27 | 1.33 | 1.51 | 1.96 | 1.66 | 1.62 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 0.96 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.84 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.92 | 3.92 | 3.69 | 3.44 | 3.26 | 3.65 | 3.84 | 3.98 | 4.09 | 2.86 | 2.93 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 104.31 | 102.16 | 98.17 | 111.27 | 96.36 | 100.96 | 98.86 | 97.24 | 85.42 | 80.71 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.0% | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.9% | 2.6% | 2.6% | 2.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Payout Ratio | 31.7% | 31.7% | 39.1% | 56.2% | 55.4% | 83.1% | 79.9% | 39.2% | 83.1% | 3741.8% | 67.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.5% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 3.6% | 2.4% | 0.0% | 2.1% |
| FCF Yield | 1.5% | 4.8% | 4.5% | 4.8% | — | 4.9% | 5.2% | 3.8% | 2.1% | 4.5% | 2.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 2.5% | 2.8% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.5% | 4.0% | 1.7% | 1.9% | 2.6% | 3.1% | 2.8% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $131M | $132M | $132M | $131M | $131M | $131M | $132M | $131M | $131M | $131M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FLS stock.
Flowserve Corporation's current P/E ratio is 40.4x. The historical average is 31.1x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
Flowserve Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 15.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 10.8x.
Flowserve Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 16.1%. The historical average is 13.5%.
Based on historical data, Flowserve Corporation is trading at a P/E of 40.4x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Flowserve Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.04% with a payout ratio of 31.7%.
Flowserve Corporation has 34.6% gross margin and 13.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Flowserve Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.5x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage rising with acquisitions
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Priced Beyond Reported Growth
Based on FLS's reported figures, the trailing P/E of 29.56 and EV/EBITDA of 15.51 sit above the 17.62 and 13.27 medians of closer peers Pentair and Franklin Electric, implying the market prices in more durable earnings than recent growth reliably supports.
The gap between trailing P/E of 29.56 and forward P/E of 18.95 suggests that the trailing earnings base is depressed by the net income volatility visible in recent quarters, so the forward multiple is the more relevant anchor. A PEG of 1.38 is not punitive, but it depends on earnings growth being sustained, which the mixed quarterly EPS readings do not yet demonstrate. Investors should monitor whether forward earnings converge toward the trailing figures before accepting the premium.
Thin Net Margins Mask Operating Stability
As reported in financial statements, FLS operating margin has held between 9.0% and 15.8% while net margin swung from 18.7% to negative 2.4%, indicating that below-the-line items, not core operations, drive most of the headline earnings volatility.
Gross margin of roughly 32% to 37% sits well below the 44.5% and 52.5% reported by IDEX and Graco, pointing to limited pricing power in the product mix. Because net margin is so distorted by non-operating swings, operating margin provides a cleaner read on earning power. The implication is that the business earns a moderate, relatively stable operating return, and the reliability of net income should be questioned before it is capitalized.
ROIC Eroding Against Peer Benchmarks
Based on reported figures, FLS ROIC has compressed to roughly 3.0% to 3.3% in recent quarters from 3.5% a year earlier, while Graco's 22.6% and Pentair's 12.0% indicate a substantial return gap that acquisitions have not closed.
The stable ROE near 3.5% to 4.4% alongside rising total assets from $5.2B to $6.3B suggests that acquired capital is earning returns below the company's cost of capital. Returns are being diluted by the expanding asset base rather than compounding through margin gains. Investors should watch whether incremental acquisition returns improve, since current figures do not yet indicate value creation on new invested capital.
Debt Build Outpaces Equity Accumulation
According to reported balance sheet data, FLS total debt rose from $1.5B to $2.3B while equity grew only from $2.0B to $2.3B, lifting debt-to-equity to a peak of 1.00 before easing to 0.95, a level that warrants continued monitoring.
Interest coverage has ranged from roughly 5.6x to 6.9x in recent quarters, a level that currently supports debt service, though the coverage figures spiking to 17.97x in one quarter reflect volatile earnings rather than a durable improvement. Debt-to-EBITDA near 11x to 13x is elevated, meaning coverage depends heavily on EBITDA holding up. The data does not disclose covenant terms or refinancing schedules, so the leverage conclusion rests on reported ratios alone.
Working Capital Metrics Mislead on Cash Quality
Based on reported figures, the current ratio of 2.10 and quarterly cash conversion cycle near 132 to 148 days may appear comfortable, yet the current ratio is most commonly misapplied to a business whose receivables and inventory carry heavy timing swings.
A current ratio near 2.0 looks like ample liquidity, but for a project-driven industrial manufacturer, inventory and receivables can be slow to convert, so the quick ratio of roughly 1.4 to 1.6 is a more conservative gauge. The cash conversion cycle exceeding 130 days suggests substantial capital tied up in working capital. The better metric is operating cash flow relative to working capital movements over a full cycle, which avoids overstating liquidity from a single balance sheet snapshot.