Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 35.6x · EV/EBITDA 8.1x · ROE 8.0%. (2018–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $5.6B | $9.5B | $4.5B | $4.6B | $3.2B | $3.4B | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6.3B | $9.3B | $11.2B | $5.9B | $5.6B | $3.7B | $3.5B | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 35.61 | 58.31 | 34.25 | 51.99 | 53.27 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.64 | 1.34 | 2.85 | 1.77 | 2.32 | 2.33 | 4.43 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.75 | 2.86 | 9.33 | 5.22 | 9.63 | 7.96 | 5.07 | — | — |
| P/FCF | 5.33 | 11.23 | 30.58 | 18.09 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 4.20 | 8.84 | 18.99 | 11.68 | 16.81 | 108.96 | 145.10 | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.21 | 3.35 | 2.28 | 2.82 | 2.71 | 4.53 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.06 | 11.82 | 20.54 | 17.78 | 23.04 | 67.24 | 130.60 | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 17.99 | 24.03 | 185.51 | 38.63 | 47.05 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.54 | 35.96 | 23.36 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 34.2% | 34.2% | 29.2% | 26.8% | 23.6% | 20.4% | 23.2% | 23.7% | 25.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 8.4% | 7.4% | 4.5% | 4.8% | -3.6% | -7.5% | -0.6% | -2.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | 2.8% | 2.8% | 6.9% | 3.4% | 3.8% | -3.6% | -2.4% | -7.7% | -9.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.0% | 8.0% | 24.3% | 12.8% | 17.1% | -9.1% | -5.7% | -905.6% | -133.8% |
| ROA | 1.7% | 1.7% | 5.4% | 2.9% | 3.1% | -2.4% | -1.4% | -7.4% | -7.5% |
| ROIC | 6.3% | 6.3% | 7.6% | 4.7% | 5.9% | -4.4% | -6.4% | -0.6% | -1.7% |
| ROCE | 6.3% | 6.3% | 7.8% | 4.6% | 4.3% | -2.6% | -4.9% | -0.7% | -2.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.83 | 2.05 | 3.67 | 4.41 | 1.50 | — | 13.37 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.90 | 5.90 | 5.30 | 5.39 | 7.24 | 31.91 | 37.83 | 11.00 | 12.75 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.87 | 1.64 | 1.52 | 2.06 | 1.33 | 0.12 | — | 13.25 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 4.66 | 4.66 | 3.07 | 4.01 | 4.06 | 9.60 | 2.95 | 10.94 | 12.64 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.32 | 5.37 | 5.27 | — | — | — | 93.63 | 33.87 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.03 | 2.03 | 0.97 | 4.72 | 3.67 | -1.75 | -1.83 | -0.07 | 0.14 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.38 | 1.64 | 3.70 | 7.91 | 10.40 | 0.82 | 0.72 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.38 | 1.63 | 3.68 | 7.89 | 10.38 | 0.75 | 0.67 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.89 | 6.70 | 9.33 | 0.03 | 0.05 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.48 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.93 | 0.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | 264.89 | 552.06 | 317.38 | 311.17 | 392.73 | 65.65 | 82.33 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 64.79 | 38.21 | 36.55 | 36.05 | 55.57 | 44.83 | 42.87 | 36.46 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.9% | 0.5% | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 25.2% | 25.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.8% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 1.9% | 1.9% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 18.8% | 8.9% | 3.3% | 5.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 18.3% | 8.7% | 1.5% | 2.3% | 4.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 19.2% | 9.2% | 1.5% | 2.3% | 4.0% | 0.6% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $89M | $92M | $61M | $83M | $55M | $45M | $46M | $39M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 8 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FOUR stock.
Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 35.6x. The historical average is 49.5x. This places it at the 25th percentile of its historical range.
Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 28.1x.
Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 8.0%. The historical average is -12.4%.
Based on historical data, Shift4 Payments, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 35.6x. This is at the 25th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 0.88% with a payout ratio of 25.2%.
Shift4 Payments, Inc. has 34.2% gross margin and 8.4% operating margin.
Shift4 Payments, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.9x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage and SBC dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Value or Value Trap?
Trading at 7.55x forward earnings and 4.41x forward EV/EBITDA, FOUR's multiples imply aggressive growth expectations, yet trailing P/E of 44.44x suggests market skepticism about earnings sustainability.
The forward P/E of 7.55x is dramatically lower than the trailing 44.44x, indicating that the market expects a massive earnings jump, likely from recent acquisitions and cost synergies. However, the EV/EBITDA of 8.91x is below the peer average of roughly 15x, suggesting the market is pricing in operational risks. The P/S of 0.79x is low for a high-growth software company, but this may reflect concerns about revenue quality and integration challenges. Investors should monitor whether the forward estimates are achievable given the historical volatility in margins and the heavy reliance on M&A.
Margin Expansion Masks Earnings Volatility
Gross margin improved from 26.5% in 2024Q1 to 34.4% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, but operating margin remains volatile, swinging from 3.0% to 10.8% over the same period, indicating inconsistent operating leverage.
The gross margin expansion suggests a favorable mix shift toward higher-margin software and services, which is a positive structural trend. However, operating margin volatility, with a low of 3.0% in 2025Q1 and a high of 10.8% in 2025Q4, indicates that the company has not yet achieved stable operating leverage. Net margin is particularly erratic, spiking to 13.1% in 2024Q4 due to one-time items, then falling to 1.7% in 2026Q2. This suggests that reported profitability is heavily influenced by non-recurring items and acquisition-related costs, making it difficult to assess true earning power. The consistent negative retained earnings and heavy SBC further cloud the quality of earnings.
Returns on Capital Remain Subdued
ROIC has hovered between 0.7% and 2.5% over the past ten quarters, as reported, indicating that the company is not yet generating meaningful returns on its growing capital base, despite revenue acceleration.
ROIC has remained below 2.5% for most of the period, which is well below the cost of capital and peer averages (e.g., Payoneer's ROIC of 30.7%). This suggests that the aggressive M&A and capital expenditures are not yet translating into profitable returns. ROE is similarly low, averaging around 2% in recent quarters, with a spike to 11.2% in 2024Q4 that appears to be driven by one-time gains. The low returns on capital indicate that the company is in a heavy investment phase, and investors should monitor whether these investments eventually yield higher returns. The high goodwill and intangibles (31% of assets) may also be masking the true economic returns.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
DSO rose from 31 days in 2024Q1 to 53 days in 2026Q2, per financial statements, while DPO increased from 38 to 67 days, suggesting the company is stretching payables but also facing slower collections.
The increase in DSO from 31 to 53 days indicates that the company is taking longer to collect receivables, which could be a sign of customer mix shift or integration issues. Meanwhile, DPO has also increased, which may be a deliberate strategy to manage cash flow, but it could strain supplier relationships. The cash conversion cycle is negative in 2024 (around -4 days) but becomes unavailable in later quarters due to missing DIO data, making it difficult to assess the full working capital cycle. The asset turnover has declined from 0.24 in 2024Q1 to 0.15 in 2026Q2, indicating that the company is becoming less efficient at generating revenue from its asset base, likely due to the large acquisitions.
Leverage Ratios Signal Rising Risk
D/E climbed from 1.98 in 2024Q1 to 2.62 in 2026Q2, while D/EBITDA reached 19.52x, as per balance sheet data, indicating a significant increase in financial risk.
The D/E ratio of 2.62 is high compared to peers like Payoneer (0.10) and EVERTEC (1.58), suggesting that Shift4 is more aggressively leveraged. D/EBITDA of 19.52x is extremely elevated, far above the typical threshold of 3-4x for investment-grade companies, indicating that the company's debt load is very high relative to its earnings. Interest coverage has deteriorated from 5.55x in 2024Q4 to 1.57x in 2026Q2, meaning that operating income barely covers interest expenses. This suggests that the company is highly vulnerable to rising interest rates or any downturn in earnings. The negative retained earnings and heavy reliance on debt to fund acquisitions further exacerbate the risk.
Liquidity Cushion Thins Rapidly
Current ratio fell from 2.53 in 2025Q2 to 1.21 in 2026Q2, while cash dropped from $3.0B to $356M, as per balance sheet, indicating a shrinking liquidity buffer.
The current ratio of 1.21 is barely above 1, suggesting that current assets are only slightly higher than current liabilities, which could be a concern if the company faces any cash flow disruptions. The quick ratio is identical to the current ratio, indicating that inventory is not a significant factor, which is typical for a software company. The dramatic decline in cash from $3.0B to $356M over four quarters suggests that the company has been deploying cash aggressively into acquisitions and buybacks, leaving a thin liquidity cushion. Under a severe stress scenario, such as a revenue shortfall or a credit market freeze, the company may struggle to meet its short-term obligations without additional financing.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA is often used to value Shift4, but the metric is distorted by heavy stock-based compensation and acquisition-related costs, making it an unreliable gauge of true cash earnings.
The EV/EBITDA multiple of 8.91x appears attractive, but EBITDA does not account for stock-based compensation, which averaged $16M per quarter, nor does it adjust for the significant integration costs and one-time items that have inflated EBITDA in some quarters. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR or EV/Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes non-cash charges and acquisition-related expenses. Additionally, the company's heavy capital expenditures (5.6% of revenue in 2026Q2) mean that EBITDA overstates cash generation, so investors should also consider EV/FCF, which is 6.65x, but FCF has been volatile and turned negative in 2026Q2. Using EV/EBITDA without these adjustments could lead to an overvaluation of the company's true earning power.