Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -338.3%. (2015–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $355287 | $951434 | $9M | $20M | $45M | $132M | $58M | $40M | $40M | $38M | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $4M | $12M | $22M | $47M | $139M | $55M | $40M | $38M | $11M | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.58 | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 1.18 | 1.73 | 6.15 | 158.63 | 11.24 | 1.92 | 1.30 | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.08 | 0.18 | — | 7.65 | 14.28 | — | 91.90 | 15.87 | 1.00 | 1.00 | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.39 | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.38 | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.31 | 0.86 | 1.27 | 1.82 | 6.46 | 149.67 | 11.24 | 1.84 | 0.37 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.44 | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.44 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.40 | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | -25.5% | -25.5% | -32.3% | -29.4% | -11.4% | -9.8% | — | 98.2% | 96.6% | 97.5% | 97.9% |
| Operating Margin | -45.1% | -45.1% | -47.3% | -48.4% | -27.3% | -22.4% | -2492.7% | -1584.2% | -14.1% | 85.1% | 89.4% |
| Net Profit Margin | -60.5% | -60.5% | -40.8% | -54.7% | -31.6% | -38.2% | -2482.1% | -1742.1% | -18.3% | 82.4% | 74.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -338.3% | -338.3% | -568.0% | -324.0% | -261.4% | — | -576.0% | -184.0% | -5.6% | 49.8% | 51.7% |
| ROA | -86.5% | -86.5% | -71.2% | -91.2% | -83.1% | -127.4% | -198.3% | -171.2% | -5.2% | 44.1% | 45.9% |
| ROIC | -81.1% | -81.1% | -147.2% | -129.2% | -330.7% | — | — | -128.5% | -4.1% | 55.2% | 48.6% |
| ROCE | -209.2% | -209.2% | -586.1% | -275.3% | -225.5% | — | -347.9% | -164.9% | -4.3% | 51.4% | 62.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.65 | 0.65 | — | 1.17 | 1.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.58 | — | 0.57 | 0.75 | — | -5.19 | -0.01 | -0.02 | -0.38 | -0.07 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.09 | -0.11 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -0.99 | -0.13 |
| Interest Coverage | -9.30 | -9.30 | -7.19 | -10.29 | -7.93 | -6.18 | — | — | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.30 | 0.47 | 1.90 | 2.66 | 32.99 | 9.65 | 6.63 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.28 | 1.30 | 0.47 | 1.90 | 2.66 | 32.99 | 9.65 | 6.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 1.80 | 0.01 | 0.80 | 3.45 | 0.42 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.04 | 2.41 | 1.70 | 2.49 | 2.31 | 0.10 | 0.64 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.62 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 129.67 | 107.76 | 135.26 | 96.91 | 70.47 | 186.58 | 567.23 | 1089.33 | 606.40 | 536.92 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 63.4% | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 72.1% | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 6.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.1% | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $113266 | $45642 | $2393 | $781 | $132 | $58 | $40 | $40 | $38 | $36 |
Imminent liquidity and solvency
As reported in financial statements, FRGT's gross margin remains deeply negative at -21.0% in 2025Q4, indicating that the company is currently paying more for transportation services than it collects from shippers, which suggests a fundamental lack of pricing power within its core brokerage operations.
The inability to achieve positive gross margins after multiple quarters suggests that the platform's automated pricing algorithms may be failing to account for the true cost of capacity. This structural deficit implies that the company is effectively subsidizing its own revenue growth, which is unsustainable without a significant shift in the take-rate or operational efficiency.
Based on recent quarterly data, the company's Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) has fluctuated significantly, reaching 117 days in 2025Q4, which highlights severe friction in the cash collection cycle compared to industry standards for logistics platforms that typically operate with much tighter working capital requirements.
The extreme volatility in DSO, which peaked as high as 784 days in 2024Q3, suggests that the company faces significant challenges in managing its customer credit risk and collection processes. Such erratic working capital management complicates the firm's liquidity position and indicates that the platform may lack the leverage necessary to enforce favorable payment terms with its shipper base.
According to historical data, FRGT has consistently generated negative ROIC, with the most recent figure at -13.8% in 2025Q4, demonstrating that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it through its capital-intensive logistics brokerage model.
The persistent negative returns on capital suggest that the company's investments in technology and platform development have yet to yield a competitive advantage that translates into economic profit. Investors should monitor whether the company can ever achieve a positive spread between its return on capital and its cost of capital, which currently appears unlikely given the ongoing operational losses.
As indicated by recent SEC filings, the company's current ratio of 1.00 and a cash balance of only $346,718 suggest a highly vulnerable liquidity position that leaves little room for error in managing its ongoing operating expenses and debt service obligations.
The company's reliance on external financing to maintain operations is evident, as the current liquidity buffer appears insufficient to cover the persistent cash burn observed in recent quarters. This situation warrants extreme caution, as any further deterioration in working capital or unexpected operational costs could necessitate immediate, potentially dilutive, capital raises to avoid a solvency crisis.
Market participants often misapply SaaS-based valuation multiples to FRGT, ignoring the fact that the company's financials reflect a traditional, low-margin freight brokerage model rather than a scalable software business with high incremental margins and recurring revenue streams.
Valuing the company based on revenue multiples is misleading because the reported revenue likely includes the full cost of purchased transportation, which masks the company's true economic contribution. Analysts should instead focus on the 'net revenue' or 'gross profit' as the primary valuation driver, as the current top-line figures significantly overstate the scale and profitability of the underlying platform.
Includes 30+ ratios · 11 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FRGT stock.
Freight Technologies, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.1x. The historical average is 1.6x.
Freight Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -338.3%. The historical average is -124.0%.
Based on historical data, Freight Technologies, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Freight Technologies, Inc. has -25.5% gross margin and -45.1% operating margin.