VCP Scanner
ScreenerTechnicalBreakoutsThemes
DCF ValuationCalculate intrinsic value of US stocks
Market ValuationBuffett indicator, CAPE & macro gauges
Total ReturnSee dividends + price return history
DCA CalculatorSimulate recurring buys & compounding
VisualizeInteractive multi-year financial charts
Earnings
FAANG & Tech
AAPL vs MSFTNVDA vs AMDGOOGL vs META
Cloud & Cyber
CRM vs NOWCRWD vs PANWSNOW vs DDOG
Consumer & Auto
TSLA vs FAMZN vs WMTNFLX vs DIS
Finance & Crypto
JPM vs BACV vs MACOIN vs MSTR
Pharma & Energy
LLY vs NVOJNJ vs PFEXOM vs CVX
Compare Any Stocks...
WatchlistPricing
ScreenerTechnical ScannerBreakoutsThemes
Earnings
WatchlistPricing
Ctrl K
FRHC
← Back to Screener
VCP ScannerFree US Stock Screener & Financial Analysis

Find stocks. Analyze deeply. Research with clarity.

Data updated daily

Product

  • Screener
  • Themes
  • Valuation
  • Total Return
  • DCA Calculator
  • Pricing
  • News
  • Earnings

Resources

  • Market Valuation
  • Compare
  • Insider Activity
  • Methodology
  • How It Works
  • Glossary
  • Learn

Get Ideas

Get weekly market insights — free

© 2026 VCP Scanner
AboutPrivacyTermsRefund Policy
Not financial advice. Do your own research.
ScreenerBreakoutsCompareWatchlist
FRHCFreedom Holding Corp.
$162.43$10.0B
Overview & Tools
OverviewChart Terminal ↗Visualize
Valuation & Forecasts
Valuation ModelsEstimatesDCF Model
Price & Analyst Data
Analyst TargetsPrice History
Financial Statements
Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios & Margins
Performance
P/E HistoryRevenue HistoryEarnings HistoryDividend HistoryTotal Return
Discovery & Screens
Live BreakoutsStock ScreenerOwnership
  1. Home
  2. Financial Ratios

  1. Home
  2. Stocks
  3. FRHC
  4. Financial Ratios

Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) Financial Ratios

Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 64.7x · EV/EBITDA 15.1x · ROE 11.3%. (1997–2026 historical series)

Income StatementBalance SheetCash FlowRatios
AnnualQuarterly

FRHC Valuation Multiples

Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Market Cap$10.0B$8.9B$8.0B$4.2B$4.3B$3.5B$3.1B$827M$505M$229M—
Enterprise Value$11.3B$10.2B$9.1B$6.7B$5.3B$4.2B$3.4B$899M$561M$337M—
P/E Ratio →64.7157.7294.4111.1520.8315.5220.8433.0272.2512.69—
P/S Ratio5.855.205.343.637.295.779.6111.308.475.32—
P/B Ratio6.675.956.583.595.556.4711.316.414.291.00—
P/FCF——5.04———5.9110.269.44——
P/OCF61.9955.134.76———5.8910.018.63——

P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart

FRHC EV Ratios

Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
EV / Revenue—6.016.085.819.046.8510.3712.289.417.83—
EV / EBITDA15.1113.6414.047.1311.879.3718.6322.8122.059.67—
EV / EBIT15.8414.3014.047.1711.929.5319.3122.8824.2210.10—
EV / FCF——5.75———6.3711.1510.49——

FRHC Profitability

Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency

Margins

Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Gross Margin72.2%72.2%52.6%70.3%71.7%72.9%57.8%76.7%91.6%96.0%98.2%
Operating Margin32.6%32.6%31.1%55.9%55.5%64.5%51.3%45.9%31.5%57.7%-3.0%
Net Profit Margin7.0%7.0%4.2%22.7%25.8%33.0%43.1%29.8%9.6%31.5%32.5%

Return on Capital

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
ROE11.3%11.3%7.1%38.8%31.1%55.3%74.0%20.1%4.1%13.4%28.6%
ROA1.3%1.3%0.9%5.6%4.9%8.5%11.7%6.2%2.1%8.1%9.7%
ROIC15.3%15.3%12.8%21.0%17.4%31.4%28.0%11.8%5.6%9.9%-0.8%
ROCE21.3%21.3%25.4%49.9%40.7%83.6%63.0%19.9%15.8%34.4%-1.8%

FRHC Leverage & Debt

Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Debt / Equity1.571.571.612.632.091.621.501.050.900.761.36
Debt / EBITDA3.123.123.013.263.601.982.293.424.174.96—
Net Debt / Equity—0.920.922.161.331.210.890.560.480.470.85
Net Debt / EBITDA1.831.831.722.682.301.471.361.822.213.11—
Debt / FCF——0.70———0.470.891.05—7.92
Interest Coverage1.461.461.211.872.135.737.763.851.582.262.52

FRHC Liquidity & Efficiency

Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Current Ratio1.351.351.321.341.361.271.171.871.761.681.82
Quick Ratio1.351.351.321.341.361.271.171.871.761.681.82
Cash Ratio0.110.110.120.090.160.090.100.280.260.330.35
Asset Turnover—0.170.210.200.160.210.170.180.210.170.16
Inventory Turnover———————————
Days Sales Outstanding———————————

FRHC Shareholder Yields

Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders

Dividends

Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Dividend Yield———————————
Payout Ratio———————————

Total Shareholder Return Metrics

MetricTTMFY 2026FY 2025FY 2024FY 2023FY 2022FY 2021FY 2020FY 2019FY 2018FY 2017
Earnings Yield1.5%1.7%1.1%9.0%4.8%6.4%4.8%3.0%1.4%7.9%—
FCF Yield——19.8%———16.9%9.7%10.6%——
Buyback Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
Total Shareholder Yield0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%—
Shares Outstanding—$61M$60M$59M$60M$59M$58M$58M$58M$33M$11M

Key Metrics

Growth RegimeDecelerating
ProfitabilityStrained
Balance SheetAdequate
Cash FlowMixed
Top Statement Risk

Elevated leverage and geopolitical exposure

Verified Source

Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.

SEC 10-K (2027Q1)

Premium Multiple Pricing in Frontier Market

FRHC trades at 6.53x book and 63.4x trailing earnings, per reported data, implying the market prices in sustained high growth despite decelerating revenue and thin net margins.

The P/B of 6.53x is far above the peer group's range of 1.98x (IBKR) to 5.31x (LPLA), suggesting investors are paying for the Kazakhstani ecosystem's growth optionality rather than current profitability. With a forward P/E of 25.3x, the market appears to expect a significant earnings recovery from the depressed trailing base, but the 7.0% net margin and 11% equity-to-assets ratio may not support such optimism if growth continues to moderate. The valuation gap versus peers may reflect a jurisdictional risk premium that could compress if governance improves, but it also leaves little room for disappointment.

Operating Efficiency Fails to Reach Bottom Line

ROE averaged roughly 3% over the last ten quarters, per reported figures, as a 32.6% operating margin is eroded by non-operating drag, leaving net margin at just 7.0%.

The DuPont decomposition reveals that while the efficiency ratio is exceptionally low (15.3% in 2027Q1), the translation to net income is poor, with a wide gap between operating and net margins suggesting significant tax or non-operating charges. ROE of 2.1% in 2027Q1 is far below the cost of equity, and the 11% equity-to-assets ratio implies leverage is not amplifying returns as it does for more traditional banks. The reliance on fee income (59.7% of revenue in 2027Q1) adds volatility, as trading volumes and market conditions can swing quarterly results dramatically.

NIM Recovery Masks Funding Cost Pressures

Net interest margin improved from -1.7% in 2025Q1 to 0.8% in 2027Q1, per reported quarterly data, but remains thin and vulnerable to rising deposit costs in Kazakhstan.

The 250 basis point NIM turnaround is a positive signal, but the absolute level of 0.8% is far below what a traditional bank would need to generate adequate returns on equity. The negative NIMs in prior quarters suggest the company was paying more on deposits than it earned on interest-bearing assets, likely due to a large securities portfolio with yields lagging funding costs. The efficiency ratio's volatility (from 7.5% to 44.5%) indicates that operating leverage is highly sensitive to revenue swings, which is typical of a brokerage-heavy model but makes cost control less predictable.

Thin Equity Cushion Limits Capital Flexibility

Equity-to-assets declined from 14% to 11% over ten quarters, per reported balance sheet data, while debt-to-equity reached 1.57, indicating a thinner buffer for unexpected losses.

The 11% equity-to-assets ratio is low for a financial holding company, especially one with a growing loan book and proprietary trading exposure. With no dividends or buybacks across all ten quarters, management is retaining all earnings, but the capital base is not expanding proportionally to asset growth, which grew 69% over the period. This suggests that organic capital generation is insufficient to support the balance sheet expansion, and the company may need to raise external capital or slow growth to maintain regulatory compliance.

Provision Volatility Signals Credit Cycle Uncertainty

Loan loss provisions swung from a $158.8M charge in 2026Q1 to a $10.7M release in 2027Q1, per reported figures, indicating credit conditions are stabilizing but remain unpredictable.

The sharp reversal in provisions suggests that the earlier charge may have been overly conservative or that the credit environment in Kazakhstan has improved, but the lack of granular disclosure on NPL ratios and coverage makes it difficult to assess adequacy. The rapid growth of the digital loan book, particularly auto and mortgage lending, warrants close monitoring, as frontier market credit risk can deteriorate quickly. The provision release in 2027Q1 may be a one-time event, and investors should not extrapolate it as a trend without more data.

P/E Misleads on Earnings Quality

The trailing P/E of 63.4x is distorted by volatile proprietary trading gains and losses, per reported data, obscuring the underlying profitability of the brokerage and banking operations.

For a financial holding company with significant trading income, P/E is a poor valuation metric because it captures one-time mark-to-market swings that do not reflect recurring earning power. A more appropriate measure is P/B (6.53x) combined with ROTCE, which adjusts for tangible book value and provides a clearer picture of return generation on the capital base. Investors should also adjust for the potential mixing of segregated client funds with corporate cash, which could overstate the true liquidity and equity base, as noted in company intelligence.

Download Financial Ratios Data

Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily

Consensus & Technical Research Suite
Open FRHC Terminal

FRHC Chart Terminal

WASM

Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.

Launch Terminal

Live Breakouts Feed

LIVE

High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.

Explore Setups

Intrinsic Valuation

DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.

Check Valuation

Historical Returns

10-year return with dividends reinvested.

Calculate

Peer Comparison

Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.

Compare

FRHC — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most common questions about buying FRHC stock.

What is Freedom Holding Corp.'s P/E ratio?

Freedom Holding Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 64.7x. The historical average is 37.6x. This places it at the 78th percentile of its historical range.

What is Freedom Holding Corp.'s EV/EBITDA?

Freedom Holding Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.4x.

What is Freedom Holding Corp.'s ROE?

Freedom Holding Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 11.3%. The historical average is -9.6%.

Is FRHC stock overvalued?

Based on historical data, Freedom Holding Corp. is trading at a P/E of 64.7x. This is at the 78th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.

What are Freedom Holding Corp.'s profit margins?

Freedom Holding Corp. has 72.2% gross margin and 32.6% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.

How much debt does Freedom Holding Corp. have?

Freedom Holding Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.1x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.