Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.4x · EV/EBITDA 4.9x · ROE -18.1%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.0B | $1.5B | — | — | $7.5B | $4.5B | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.8B | $2.2B | — | — | $10.2B | $6.9B | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.39 | — | — | — | 3.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.02 | 1.40 | — | — | 8.41 | 6.06 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.61 | 0.86 | — | — | 1.21 | 1.04 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | 12.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 2.83 | 3.97 | — | — | 123.29 | 54.05 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.10 | — | — | 11.42 | 9.29 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.86 | 4.99 | — | — | 200.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 9.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 18.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 29.7% | 29.7% | 70.3% | 69.9% | 68.1% | 69.3% | 51.5% | 67.6% | 67.1% | 39.4% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 17.0% | 14.9% | 12.4% | -24.1% | -38.1% | -233.4% | 8.4% | 6.7% | 15.8% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | -29.5% | -29.5% | 7.4% | 4.5% | 244.3% | -118.1% | 3042.3% | -0.4% | -2.7% | 0.8% | 1.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -18.1% | -18.1% | 4.8% | 1.1% | 41.6% | -23.4% | 28.5% | -0.2% | -1.7% | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| ROA | -9.1% | -9.1% | 2.1% | 0.5% | 21.2% | -11.2% | 11.2% | -0.1% | -0.4% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| ROIC | 5.5% | 5.5% | 4.2% | 1.5% | -2.1% | -3.8% | -1.1% | 2.4% | 2.9% | 5.5% | 6.3% |
| ROCE | 5.5% | 5.5% | 4.4% | 1.5% | -2.3% | -4.2% | -1.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.5% | 2.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.73 | 0.53 | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.87 | 1.36 | 1.57 | 4.12 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.62 | 2.62 | 3.29 | 3.23 | 64.21 | — | — | 16.27 | 19.41 | 13.48 | 5.43 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.43 | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.40 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 2.94 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.66 | 1.66 | 3.07 | 3.00 | 53.01 | — | — | 11.52 | 1.33 | 1.89 | 3.88 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 5.98 | 34.42 | 18.98 | — | — | 11.90 | 1.20 | 1.12 | 0.79 | — |
| Interest Coverage | -7.58 | -7.58 | 2.86 | 2.20 | -1.40 | -2.36 | -0.67 | 1.00 | 0.84 | 1.98 | 1.62 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.14 | 3.14 | 1.66 | 1.85 | 1.84 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 3.06 | 1.26 | 0.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.14 | 3.14 | 1.66 | 1.85 | 1.84 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 3.00 | 1.19 | 0.67 |
| Cash Ratio | 2.16 | 2.16 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 1.44 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 2.93 | 1.17 | 0.60 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.08 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.86 | 3.30 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | 2.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 214.3% | 158.5% | 8.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 | FY 2015 | FY 2014 | FY 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | 25.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | 8.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | 0.0% | 2.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | 2.4% | 2.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $40M | $29M | $29M | $106M | $109M | $35M | $37M | $38M | $53M | $45M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 16 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GLIBA stock.
Liberty Capital Corporation's current P/E ratio is -3.4x. The historical average is 3.9x.
Liberty Capital Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 4.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 5.0x.
Liberty Capital Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -18.1%. The historical average is 3.4%.
Based on historical data, Liberty Capital Corporation is trading at a P/E of -3.4x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Liberty Capital Corporation has 29.7% gross margin and 17.0% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
Liberty Capital Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.6x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory subsidy and satellite disruption
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Deep Discount Masks Operating Value
Trading at 0.63x book and 4.12x EV/EBITDA, the market prices GLIBA as a holding-company discount, not an operating utility. According to the latest valuation metrics, the negative trailing P/E reflects non-cash charges, while forward P/E of 8.06 suggests normalized earnings power.
The P/B of 0.63 implies the market values the asset base at a 37% discount to book, likely due to the Liberty conglomerate structure and the opacity of the GCI operating unit. The forward P/E of 8.06, if realized, would be below the typical utility range, suggesting either undervaluation or skepticism about earnings sustainability. The absence of a dividend yield reinforces the view that investors are not being compensated for income, making the stock a pure capital-appreciation play on the underlying cable and broadband assets.
Earned ROE Far Below Authorized
Earned ROE of 0.9% in 2026Q2, as reported in the latest quarterly data, is drastically below any plausible authorized return for a regulated utility, indicating severe regulatory lag or non-recurring distortions. The 2025Q3 ROE of -26.8% further underscores the volatility.
The gap between earned and allowed ROE is extreme, even for a utility with a high-risk profile. The 2025Q3 collapse to -26.8% likely reflects a one-time impairment or revaluation, but the subsequent recovery to only 0.9% suggests that core operations are barely covering the cost of equity. This may indicate that the regulatory compact is not functioning effectively, or that the company's earnings are being suppressed by factors outside the regulated utility, such as the equity method losses from Charter. Investors should monitor whether management can close this gap through rate cases or cost reductions.
Margin Compression Signals Recovery Lag
Operating margin fell to 13.9% in 2026Q2 from 19.5% a year earlier, as per the quarterly data, suggesting that cost recovery mechanisms are not fully offsetting rising expenses. This may indicate a widening gap between authorized and earned returns.
The 570 basis point year-over-year decline in operating margin is significant for a utility, where margins are typically stable. The 2025Q3 operating margin of -189.9% is clearly an anomaly, but the trend from 2025Q2 to 2026Q2 shows a steady erosion from 19.5% to 13.9%. This suggests that either costs are rising faster than revenues, or that the company is not fully recovering its costs through rates. The increase in depreciation from $52M to $68M, as noted in the income statement analysis, indicates a growing rate base that is not yet generating proportional revenue, implying a lag in cost recovery.
Conservative Leverage with Hidden Stack
Debt-to-capital of 0.42 in 2026Q2, as reported in the latest quarterly data, appears conservative, but the interest coverage of 2.92x is thin for a utility. The 0.68% debt-to-equity ratio from the company intelligence may understate the full Liberty Broadband debt stack.
The reported debt-to-capital of 0.42 is within the typical utility range, but the interest coverage of 2.92x is below the 3x threshold often considered safe. The 2025Q3 interest coverage of -40.42x is a distortion, but the recent quarters show coverage fluctuating between 2.91x and 4.25x, indicating that earnings are barely sufficient to cover interest. The company's cash balance of $497M provides a cushion, but the capex surge to $241M in 2026Q2 may require additional debt, potentially straining coverage further. The low debt-to-equity ratio cited in the intelligence may not capture the full leverage of the Liberty structure, so investors should look through to the parent's obligations.
No Dividend, All Reinvestment
No dividends were paid in any reported quarter, as per the cash flow statement, so dividend quality is not a current concern. However, the negative free cash flow of -$155M in 2026Q2, driven by a capex spike, suggests that any future payout would be constrained.
The absence of a dividend is unusual for a utility, but it reflects the company's focus on reinvesting cash flows into network expansion and debt reduction. The capex surge to $241M in 2026Q2, a 3.4x increase from the prior quarter, indicates a major investment phase that is consuming all operating cash flow and more. While the current ratio of 3.37 and cash balance of $497M provide liquidity, the negative free cash flow implies that external funding will be needed if the capex pace continues. Investors should monitor whether management can generate sufficient returns from this investment to eventually support a dividend or share buybacks.
Misapplied P/E on Holding Structure
The most misapplied ratio for GLIBA is the P/E, which is distorted by non-cash items and the holding-company structure. According to the latest data, the trailing P/E of -3.49 is meaningless, while the forward P/E of 8.06 may understate the value of the underlying cable assets.
Comparing GLIBA's P/E to that of a pure-play utility is inappropriate because the company's earnings are heavily influenced by equity method investments and non-cash revaluations, as seen in the 2025Q3 net margin of -150.6%. The negative P/E is a red herring; instead, investors should use EV/EBITDA or a sum-of-the-parts valuation that separates the GCI operating business from the Charter and Liberty Broadband stakes. The EV/EBITDA of 4.12 is low, but it may not capture the full debt of the parent. A more appropriate metric is the price-to-book ratio, which at 0.63 suggests the market is pricing in a significant discount to net asset value, possibly due to the complexity of the structure.