Revenue declined 8.8% year-over-year to $238.0M in 2026Q2, with operating margin compressing to 13.9% from 19.5% a year earlier, reflecting regulatory lag and cost pressures.
Liberty Capital Corporation (GLIBA) annual income statement — 16-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'11 | Dec'10 | Dec'09 | Dec'08 | Dec'07 | Dec'06 |
|---|
| Revenue | 1.02B | 1.05B | 940M | 904M | 894.73M | 739.76M | 23.82M | 933.81M | 978.53M | 910.2M | 811.65M | 679.38M | 651.25M | 100K | 575.44M | 520.31M | 477.48M |
| Revenue Growth % | - | - | 3.98% | 1.04% | 20.95% | 3006.03% | -97.45% | -4.57% | 7.51% | 12.14% | 19.47% | 4.32% | 651150% | -99.98% | 10.6% | 8.97% | - |
| Cost of Revenue | 445M | 735M | 279M | 272M | 285.33M | 227.19M | 11.54M | 302.58M | 322.34M | 551.53M | 280.46M | 227.4M | 0 | 0 | 203.06M | 179.06M | 156.41M |
| Gross Profit | 311M | 311M | 661M | 632M | 609.4M | 512.57M | 12.28M | 631.23M | 656.2M | 358.67M | 531.19M | 451.98M | 651.25M | 100K | 372.38M | 341.25M | 321.08M |
| Gross Margin % | 30.4% | 29.73% | 70.32% | 69.91% | 68.11% | 69.29% | 51.54% | 67.6% | 67.06% | 39.41% | 65.45% | 66.53% | 100% | 100% | 64.71% | 65.59% | 67.24% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | - | 4.59% | 3.71% | 18.89% | 4075.38% | -98.06% | -3.8% | 82.95% | -32.48% | 17.52% | -30.6% | 651150% | -99.97% | 9.12% | 6.28% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 349M | 133M | 521M | 520M | 824.86M | 781.81M | 80M | 205M | 328M | 183M | 956M | 4M | 3M | 36K | 210.31M | 192.49M | 171.65M |
| Other Operating Expenses | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| EBITDA | 366M | 440M | 347M | 342M | 50.87M | -75.15M | -51.6M | 102.46M | 111.92M | 162.56M | 423.86M | 216.46M | 214.63M | 123.41M | 162.11M | 150.03M | 149.43M |
| EBITDA Margin % | 35.78% | 42.07% | 36.91% | 37.83% | 5.69% | -10.16% | -216.64% | 10.97% | 11.44% | 17.86% | 52.22% | 31.86% | 32.96% | 123411% | 28.17% | 28.84% | 31.29% |
| EBITDA Growth % | - | - | 1.46% | 572.29% | 167.69% | -45.65% | -150.36% | -8.45% | -31.15% | -61.65% | 95.81% | 0.86% | 73.91% | -23.87% | 8.05% | 0.41% | - |
| Depreciation & Amortization | 232M | 262M | 207M | 230M | 266.33M | 206.95M | 4M | 24M | 46M | 19M | 311M | 125.74M | 126.11M | 123.4M | 114.4M | 87.6M | 82.1M |
| D&A / Revenue % | 22.68% | 25.05% | 22.02% | 25.44% | 29.77% | 27.97% | 16.79% | 2.57% | 4.7% | 2.09% | 38.32% | 18.51% | 19.36% | 123400% | 19.88% | 16.84% | 17.19% |
| Operating Income (EBIT) | 134M | 178M | 140M | 112M | -215.46M | -282.1M | -55.6M | 78.46M | 65.92M | 143.56M | 112.86M | 90.72M | 88.51M | 11K | 47.71M | 62.43M | 67.33M |
| Operating Margin % | 13.1% | 17.02% | 14.89% | 12.39% | -24.08% | -38.13% | -233.43% | 8.4% | 6.74% | 15.77% | 13.91% | 13.35% | 13.59% | 11% | 8.29% | 12% | 14.1% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | - | 25% | 151.98% | 23.62% | -407.4% | -170.86% | 19.03% | -54.08% | 27.2% | 24.41% | 2.49% | 804545.45% | -99.98% | -23.58% | -7.27% | - |
| Interest Expense | 2M | 45M | 49M | 51M | 153.8M | 119.3M | 83.34M | 78.63M | 78.79M | 72.5M | 69.72M | 68.26M | 0 | 0 | 48.3M | 36.13M | 34.41M |
| Interest Coverage | - | -7.58x | 2.86x | 2.20x | -1.40x | -2.36x | -0.67x | 1.00x | 0.84x | 1.98x | 1.62x | 1.33x | - | - | 0.99x | 1.73x | 1.96x |
| Interest / Revenue % | 0.2% | 4.3% | 5.21% | 5.64% | 17.19% | 16.13% | 349.92% | 8.42% | 8.05% | 7.96% | 8.59% | 10.05% | 0% | 0% | 8.39% | 6.94% | 7.21% |
| Non-Operating Income | -2M | -1000K | -1000K | -1000K | 1000K | -1000K | 1000K | -1000K | -1000K | -1000K | -1000K | -1000K | -1000K | -10K | -1000K | -1000K | -1000K |
| Pretax Income | 107M | -386M | 97M | 65M | 674.46M | -1.06B | 591.03M | 1.07M | -27.71M | 69.27M | 42.68M | 13.09M | 18.44M | 1K | -792K | 25.46M | 34.25M |
| Pretax Margin % | 10.46% | -36.9% | 10.32% | 7.19% | 75.38% | -142.88% | 2481.57% | 0.11% | -2.83% | 7.61% | 5.26% | 1.93% | 2.83% | 1% | -0.14% | 4.89% | 7.17% |
| Income Tax | 10M | -77M | 27M | 24M | 165.91M | -183.31M | -41.43M | 5.21M | -1.85M | 10.03M | 10.96M | 7.49M | 9.49M | 0 | 1.08M | 11.96M | 15.8M |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 9.35% | 19.95% | 27.84% | 36.92% | 24.6% | 17.34% | -7.01% | 486.9% | 6.66% | 14.48% | 25.67% | 57.2% | 51.44% | 0% | -135.98% | 46.97% | 46.12% |
| Net Income | 97M | -309M | 70M | 41M | 2.19B | -873.3M | 724.59M | -3.67M | -26.02M | 7.56M | 9.41M | 5.84M | 8.96M | 1K | -1.87M | 13.5M | 18.52M |
| Net Margin % | 9.48% | -29.54% | 7.45% | 4.54% | 244.34% | -118.05% | 3042.31% | -0.39% | -2.66% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 1% | -0.32% | 2.6% | 3.88% |
| Net Income Growth % | - | - | 70.73% | -98.12% | 350.33% | -220.52% | 19859.64% | 85.91% | -444.38% | -19.66% | 61.09% | -34.8% | 895400% | 100.05% | -113.84% | -27.08% | - |
| EPS (Diluted) | - | -7.76 | 2.44 | 1.43 | 18.25 | -8.02 | 20.52 | -0.10 | -0.69 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| EPS Growth % | - | - | 70.63% | -92.16% | 327.56% | -139.08% | 20620% | 85.51% | -592.86% | -22.22% | 63.64% | -35.29% | - | 100.05% | -113.79% | -14.71% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | -7.76 | 2.44 | 1.43 | 18.25 | -8.02 | 20.52 | -0.10 | -0.69 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.29 | 0.34 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 0 | 39.8M | 28.7M | 28.7M | 106.2M | 108.84M | 35.32M | 36.69M | 37.75M | 52.68M | 45.5M | 52.68M | 52.68M | 51.81M | 46.73M | 46.73M | 54.47M |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GLIBA stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Liberty Capital Corporation (GLIBA) reported total revenue of $1.05B. This represents a 119.1% increase compared to $477.5M in 2006.
Liberty Capital Corporation (GLIBA) reported a net loss of $309.0M for the fiscal year ending 2025.
Liberty Capital Corporation (GLIBA) reported an operating income of $178.0M, resulting in an operating profit margin of 17.0%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Liberty Capital Corporation (GLIBA) generated $311.0M in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 29.7%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Regulatory subsidy and satellite disruption
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Slide Amid Regulatory Dependency
Revenue declined 8.8% year-over-year to $238.0M in 2026Q2, according to the latest quarterly report, reflecting weaker demand and potential subsidy adjustments. The trajectory suggests a deceleration from prior quarters.
The sequential revenue decline from $256.0M in 2026Q1 to $238.0M in 2026Q2, as reported in the income statement, indicates a softening top line. Given the geographic concentration in Alaska, this may reflect macroeconomic pressures or changes in federal subsidy programs. Investors should monitor whether this is a temporary dip or a structural shift, as revenue growth is not driven by rate base expansion but by subscriber and subsidy dynamics.
Operating Margin Compression Signals Regulatory Lag
Operating margin fell to 13.9% in 2026Q2 from 19.5% a year earlier, based on reported figures, suggesting that cost recovery mechanisms are not fully offsetting rising expenses. This may indicate a widening gap between authorized and earned returns.
The drop in operating margin from 19.5% in 2025Q2 to 13.9% in 2026Q2, as per the income statement, points to cost pressures that are not being recovered through regulatory mechanisms. Since fuel and purchased power are typically pass-through, the margin compression may stem from higher operating costs or lower revenue. This suggests that the regulatory compact may be less constructive, and investors should assess whether the company can maintain its authorized ROE.
Cost Pressures Outpace Recovery Mechanisms
Despite stable revenue, operating income fell from $51.0M in 2025Q2 to $33.0M in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, indicating that cost recovery is lagging. This may strain working capital if the trend persists.
The decline in operating income despite relatively stable revenue suggests that operating costs are rising faster than the company can recover through rates. For a utility, this could indicate that fuel or purchased power costs are not fully pass-through, or that other expenses are not being recovered timely. The negative net margin in recent quarters, though partly due to non-cash items, underscores the importance of monitoring cost recovery mechanisms.
Earnings Distorted by Non-Recurring Items
Net income swung from $27.0M in 2025Q2 to $16.0M in 2026Q2, but the 2025Q3 loss of $387.0M, as per the income statement, suggests significant non-recurring charges. Core earnings power may be more stable than headline numbers imply.
The massive loss in 2025Q3, with an operating loss of $488.0M, likely reflects impairment or restructuring charges, not ongoing operations. Excluding that quarter, the company has been consistently profitable, with net margins around 6-7% in recent quarters. This suggests that the underlying regulated business is generating steady earnings, but the reported figures are obscured by one-time items. Investors should focus on adjusted earnings to gauge true profitability.
Capital Spending Not Yet Boosting Earnings
Depreciation and amortization rose from $52.0M in 2025Q2 to $68.0M in 2026Q2, as reported in the income statement, indicating increased capital investment. However, revenue and earnings have not grown proportionally, suggesting a lag in rate base recovery.
The increase in D&A suggests that the company is investing in its network, but the lack of corresponding revenue growth implies that these investments are not yet translating into rate base and earnings. This could be due to regulatory lag or the need for further rate cases. The company's conservative leverage (debt-to-equity of 0.68%) suggests it can fund capex, but investors should monitor whether future rate cases will allow recovery of these investments.
What Could Invalidate the Base Case
The negative net margin of -29.5% and negative ROE of -18.1% in the latest report, as per the earnings release, may indicate deeper structural issues beyond non-cash items. If these persist, the company's ability to fund capex could be compromised.
While the negative net margin is partly due to non-cash items, the absence of formal guidance and the sustained losses warrant caution. The company's reliance on federal subsidies, such as the Universal Service Fund, exposes it to regulatory risk. Additionally, the expansion of LEO satellite providers like Starlink could erode its competitive moat in remote areas. If these threats materialize, the company's revenue and earnings could decline further, challenging the assumption of stable regulated earnings.