Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.3x · EV/EBITDA 3.9x · ROE 22.1%. (2005–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $569M | $382M | $493M | $490M | $925M | $704M | $788M | $1.4B | $900M | $600M | $258M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.0B | $861M | $756M | $890M | $1.3B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $1.7B | $1.2B | $892M | $543M |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.30 | 7.72 | 5.12 | 4.42 | 4.12 | 11.57 | — | 23.92 | 12.40 | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.16 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 1.02 | 2.00 | 2.20 | 1.50 | 1.82 | 1.34 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.27 | 1.55 | 2.42 | 2.78 | 8.00 | — | — | 10.42 | 6.29 | 4.74 | 1.82 |
| P/FCF | — | — | 1.76 | 4.81 | 3.10 | 8.04 | 8.44 | 12.69 | 6.84 | 16.43 | 5.92 |
| P/OCF | 38.72 | 25.97 | 1.05 | 1.63 | 1.98 | 3.25 | 4.67 | 5.88 | 3.51 | 4.22 | 3.11 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.75 | 1.14 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 1.89 | 3.54 | 2.74 | 2.03 | 2.70 | 2.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.85 | 3.16 | 1.80 | 2.05 | 2.13 | 4.72 | 188.00 | 5.45 | 3.49 | 5.80 | 11.52 |
| EV / EBIT | 6.77 | 8.38 | 2.72 | 3.54 | 3.03 | 7.28 | — | 8.46 | 5.02 | 15.50 | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 2.70 | 8.74 | 4.44 | 14.83 | 14.92 | 15.80 | 9.27 | 24.40 | 12.47 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 47.6% | 55.4% | 53.3% | 56.5% | 56.2% | 38.2% | 56.4% | 55.7% | 47.3% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | 31.5% | 31.5% | 43.6% | 41.5% | 50.0% | 27.0% | -28.1% | 33.5% | 42.7% | 23.9% | -14.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 10.1% | 10.1% | 14.6% | 14.7% | 21.4% | 8.9% | -59.2% | 9.2% | 12.0% | -7.3% | -25.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 22.1% | 22.1% | 50.8% | 76.2% | 836.8% | — | -1966.2% | 41.9% | 53.7% | -18.1% | -28.7% |
| ROA | 4.4% | 4.4% | 8.7% | 11.2% | 24.0% | 6.6% | -25.7% | 6.7% | 8.8% | -3.4% | -7.3% |
| ROIC | 19.5% | 19.5% | 41.5% | 43.1% | 75.1% | 27.1% | -17.1% | 33.8% | 43.7% | 14.0% | -4.7% |
| ROCE | 17.9% | 17.9% | 35.7% | 41.0% | 73.1% | 25.5% | -15.8% | 32.9% | 40.6% | 13.6% | -4.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 2.36 | 2.36 | 2.66 | 3.03 | 4.58 | — | — | 3.39 | 3.12 | 3.36 | 2.53 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1.29 | 1.23 | 0.85 | 2.53 | 108.90 | 1.43 | 1.28 | 2.77 | 7.61 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.95 | 1.30 | 2.27 | 3.47 | — | — | 2.55 | 2.23 | 2.30 | 2.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.76 | 1.76 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 0.64 | 2.16 | 81.65 | 1.07 | 0.92 | 1.89 | 6.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | 0.94 | 3.93 | 1.34 | 6.79 | 6.48 | 3.11 | 2.43 | 7.97 | 6.54 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.90 | 1.90 | 6.00 | 6.40 | 8.57 | 3.02 | -2.22 | 5.58 | 6.78 | 1.13 | -0.47 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.60 | 1.60 | 1.17 | 1.17 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 1.48 | 1.05 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 0.98 | 1.09 | 1.42 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.26 | 1.18 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 1.03 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.74 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 1.08 | 0.77 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.30 |
| Inventory Turnover | 20.83 | 20.83 | 27.80 | 26.07 | 31.62 | 27.65 | 18.25 | 23.98 | 28.66 | 30.50 | 40.86 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 28.98 | 22.20 | 31.38 | 32.65 | 49.40 | 68.77 | 55.25 | 9.85 | 29.89 | 48.93 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.3% | 6.3% | 6.1% | 6.1% | 2.6% | 1.0% | 0.6% | 0.2% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 48.7% | 48.7% | 31.2% | 26.8% | 10.8% | 11.8% | — | 4.2% | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.8% | 13.0% | 19.5% | 22.6% | 24.3% | 8.6% | — | 4.2% | 8.1% | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | 56.8% | 20.8% | 32.3% | 12.4% | 11.9% | 7.9% | 14.6% | 6.1% | 16.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.9% | 6.4% | 3.9% | 1.7% | 0.5% | 5.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 4.3% | 6.3% | 15.0% | 12.4% | 6.5% | 2.7% | 1.1% | 5.3% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $52M | $53M | $57M | $60M | $61M | $61M | $63M | $65M | $61M | $60M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 21 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GPRK stock.
GeoPark Limited's current P/E ratio is 11.3x. The historical average is 29.4x. This places it at the 33th percentile of its historical range.
GeoPark Limited's current EV/EBITDA is 3.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 6.1x.
GeoPark Limited's return on equity (ROE) is 22.1%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 2.8%.
Based on historical data, GeoPark Limited is trading at a P/E of 11.3x. This is at the 33th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
GeoPark Limited's current dividend yield is 4.33% with a payout ratio of 48.7%.
GeoPark Limited has 47.6% gross margin and 31.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
GeoPark Limited's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 2.1x, indicating moderate leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Volatile cash flow and earnings
Cheap Multiples Reflect Cyclical Risk
GeoPark trades at a forward EV/EBITDA of 4.27x, a significant discount to the peer Dorchester Minerals at 10.95x, suggesting the market is pricing in substantial cyclical risk and earnings volatility for this exploration and production company.
The low P/E of 11.46x and EV/EBITDA of 3.88x appear attractive on a standalone basis, but the wide dispersion in peer multiples (e.g., Gran Tierra's negative P/E) indicates the sector is not uniformly cheap. The valuation likely reflects skepticism about the sustainability of the recent margin rebound, given the company's history of sharp earnings swings.
Margin Recovery Masked by Non-Operating Drag
Operating margins have rebounded strongly to 45.5% in 2026Q2 from a low of 23.0% in 2025Q4, yet the net margin of 7.6% indicates significant non-operating charges are eroding the translation of operational success into bottom-line earnings.
The gross margin expansion to 54.9% suggests improved pricing or cost control at the wellhead level. However, the persistent and large gap between operating and net margins implies that interest expense, taxes, or other non-recurring items are a major drag on final profitability, warranting scrutiny of the income statement's non-operating section.
ROIC Volatility Undermines Compounding
Return on Invested Capital has been highly erratic, ranging from 3.0% in 2025Q4 to 11.2% in 2024Q2, indicating that the company's ability to generate consistent returns on its substantial asset base is heavily dependent on volatile commodity prices.
The ROIC trend does not show a clear compounding trajectory but rather cyclical swings. The recent improvement to 9.3% in 2026Q2 is encouraging, but its sustainability is questionable given the historical pattern. This volatility makes it difficult to assess the company's true long-term earning power from its capital investments.
Debt Burden Easing but Still Elevated
The debt-to-equity ratio has improved from 3.24 in 2025Q1 to 1.81 in 2026Q2, yet the D/EBITDA ratio spiked to 16.93x in the latest quarter, suggesting that while the balance sheet is deleveraging, near-term debt service capacity remains highly sensitive to earnings fluctuations.
The improvement in D/E is a positive trend driven by equity accumulation. However, the D/EBITDA ratio's volatility, swinging from 4.72x to 16.93x in two quarters, highlights that leverage metrics are unstable and can deteriorate rapidly if EBITDA declines. Interest coverage of 2.50x is adequate but leaves limited margin for error.
Cash Rebound Provides Temporary Buffer
The current ratio has recovered to 1.17 in 2026Q2 from a low of 1.00 in 2026Q1, supported by a cash balance of $316.3M, but this position appears volatile and may not represent a stable liquidity floor for the capital-intensive business.
The quick ratio of 1.15 indicates that liquidity is not overly dependent on inventory, which is positive. However, the dramatic swings in cash over the past ten quarters suggest that the current healthy position is a point-in-time snapshot rather than a structural feature, and investors should monitor working capital closely for signs of stress.
The Misleading Stability of D/E Ratio
The debt-to-equity ratio is the most commonly misapplied metric for GeoPark, as its improvement from 3.06 to 1.81 over two years masks the extreme volatility in the underlying EBITDA that services this debt, which is better captured by the D/EBITDA ratio.
For a cyclical E&P company, the D/E ratio can be misleadingly stable or improving even as the ability to service debt deteriorates, because equity can grow via retained earnings during good periods. The D/EBITDA ratio, which has swung from 4.25x to 16.93x, provides a far more accurate and timely picture of financial risk and should be the primary leverage metric for analysis.