Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -103.8%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $13M | $17M | $1M | $17M | $1.9B | $4.3B | $2.0B | $188M | $26M | $10M | $2M |
| Enterprise Value | $106M | $110M | $117M | $72M | $2.0B | $4.4B | $2.0B | $201M | $39M | $11M | $1M |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 16.01 | 81.45 | 83.21 | 8.39 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.26 |
| P/B Ratio | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 0.29 | 8.41 | 12.36 | 40.43 | 27.00 | 1.44 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | 71.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.08 | 1.10 | 0.46 | 16.72 | 83.06 | 82.83 | 8.98 | 1.45 | 1.04 | 0.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.1% | 21.1% | 22.7% | 19.9% | 43.1% | 54.5% | 31.5% | 13.7% | 19.8% | 37.8% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | -50.6% | -50.6% | -53.4% | -98.3% | -118.6% | -35.0% | -25.3% | -110.4% | -72.2% | -58.8% | -16.0% |
| Net Profit Margin | -65.0% | -65.0% | -52.7% | -147.7% | -154.6% | -44.4% | -123.2% | -147.2% | -118.7% | -104.3% | -14.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -103.8% | -103.8% | -184.3% | -163.3% | -63.9% | -11.8% | -104.9% | -263.2% | -174.9% | -95.0% | -31.9% |
| ROA | -24.8% | -24.8% | -21.6% | -53.7% | -34.6% | -8.2% | -49.7% | -71.4% | -80.7% | -59.0% | -21.2% |
| ROIC | -23.0% | -23.0% | -36.9% | -54.7% | -28.4% | -5.9% | -15.1% | -71.8% | -58.0% | -40.5% | -36.0% |
| ROCE | -69.5% | -69.5% | -114.4% | -71.4% | -37.5% | -7.9% | -18.2% | -158.2% | -102.7% | -51.8% | -34.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.85 | 0.85 | 57.56 | 1.04 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.19 | 1.98 | 0.79 | 0.11 | 0.08 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.74 | 55.39 | 0.93 | 0.37 | 0.24 | -0.19 | 1.91 | 0.74 | 0.03 | -0.20 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | -3.18 | -3.18 | -2.25 | -4.58 | -4.05 | -11.24 | -2.12 | -3.24 | -1.04 | -1.20 | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.87 | 1.34 | 1.57 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.80 | 2.04 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.77 | 1.27 | 1.42 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.62 | 1.45 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.72 | 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 0.53 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 1.39 |
| Inventory Turnover | 16.74 | 16.74 | 45.37 | 70.05 | 3.04 | 4.35 | 4.85 | 7.78 | 6.68 | 3.17 | 4.36 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 52.67 | 25.78 | 18.59 | 84.65 | 60.87 | 103.12 | 95.67 | 96.40 | 74.33 | 69.15 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 100.0% | 51.3% | 100.0% | 8.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 0.4% | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 7.9% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 100.0% | 51.3% | 100.0% | 16.1% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $18M | $216577 | $212000 | $86200 | $20106 | $2560 | $884 | $26 | $10 | $2 |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GPUS stock.
Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.0x. The historical average is 55.0x.
Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -103.8%. The historical average is -44.9%.
Based on historical data, Hyperscale Data, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.0x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Hyperscale Data, Inc.'s current dividend yield is 100.00%.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. has 21.1% gross margin and -50.6% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Liquidity and solvency strain
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Distressed Valuation Reflects Operational Uncertainty
Based on recent financial disclosures, GPUS trades at a price-to-book ratio of 0.13, a valuation level that suggests the market assigns minimal going-concern value to the company's fragmented industrial assets and highly volatile digital asset mining operations compared to its more focused industry peers.
The extreme discount to book value indicates that investors are pricing in significant impairment risks across the company's eight disparate segments. This valuation gap appears to reflect a lack of confidence in management's ability to pivot toward high-margin data center infrastructure without further dilutive capital raises.
Persistent Decay in Capital Returns
As reported in quarterly financial statements, the company's ROIC has remained consistently negative, bottoming out at -24.6% in 2023Q4, which highlights a structural inability to generate returns that exceed the cost of capital across its diverse and capital-intensive industrial and mining portfolio.
The inability to achieve positive returns on invested capital suggests that the company's capital allocation strategy is failing to create shareholder value. Investors should monitor whether the recent rebranding to Hyperscale Data leads to a divestment of underperforming assets, as current returns indicate a systemic destruction of capital.
Working Capital Inefficiency Hinders Liquidity
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has remained erratic, frequently dipping into negative territory due to high accounts payable relative to inventory, which suggests a reliance on supplier financing to mask underlying operational inefficiencies in its manufacturing and mining segments.
The volatility in the cash conversion cycle, combined with low asset turnover ratios, implies that the company struggles to manage its working capital effectively across its eight segments. This inefficiency forces the firm to maintain higher liquidity buffers than it currently possesses, increasing the risk of operational disruption.
Liquidity Constraints Threaten Operational Continuity
Based on the provided balance sheet data, the current ratio has consistently hovered below 1.0, reaching a low of 0.23 in 2024Q3, which indicates that the company lacks the liquid assets necessary to meet its short-term obligations without relying on external financing or asset sales.
The persistent liquidity shortfall suggests that the company is operating with a razor-thin margin for error, leaving it highly vulnerable to any downturn in its cyclical mining or defense segments. The reliance on external capital to bridge this gap warrants significant caution regarding the sustainability of current operations.
Misapplication of P/E Multiples
As reported in financial statements, the use of P/E multiples to evaluate GPUS is fundamentally flawed, as the company's persistent net losses and non-cash impairment charges render earnings-based metrics meaningless for assessing the true underlying value of its industrial and data center infrastructure assets.
Investors should instead focus on a sum-of-the-parts analysis or enterprise value to revenue, as the P/E ratio obscures the impact of non-recurring items and the high fixed-cost structure of the business. Relying on earnings multiples in this context may lead to a significant misinterpretation of the company's financial health.