Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 21.4x · EV/EBITDA 15.4x · ROE 7.8%. (1995–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.8B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.5B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.0B | $862M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.8B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.2B | $2.3B | $2.0B | $1.7B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| P/E Ratio → | 21.41 | 20.27 | 24.10 | 25.41 | 18.01 | 23.42 | 17.00 | 76.44 | 24.71 | 21.56 | 22.76 |
| P/S Ratio | 8.08 | 6.97 | 8.08 | 7.90 | 9.57 | 9.25 | 7.86 | 9.61 | 8.68 | 8.34 | 7.48 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.52 | 1.44 | 1.71 | 1.54 | 2.09 | 1.93 | 1.76 | 2.29 | 1.19 | 1.07 | 1.17 |
| P/FCF | 14.10 | 12.17 | 12.68 | 13.98 | 17.03 | 16.62 | 14.04 | 17.60 | 19.85 | 17.80 | 23.56 |
| P/OCF | 14.05 | 12.13 | 12.59 | 13.93 | 17.03 | 16.57 | 13.99 | 17.60 | 18.66 | 17.66 | 23.37 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 11.67 | 12.55 | 12.04 | 13.84 | 13.01 | 11.41 | 12.97 | 11.58 | 11.33 | 9.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.42 | 14.09 | 15.00 | 15.70 | 14.46 | 16.36 | 15.67 | 19.24 | 11.72 | 12.17 | 10.54 |
| EV / EBIT | 23.26 | 20.61 | 23.14 | 24.40 | 21.87 | 26.59 | 22.30 | 24.54 | 22.51 | 20.96 | 20.35 |
| EV / FCF | — | 20.38 | 19.70 | 21.30 | 24.62 | 23.37 | 20.36 | 23.77 | 26.48 | 24.18 | 31.38 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 40.2% | 40.2% | 92.7% | 87.2% | 87.0% | 85.8% | 84.0% | 82.2% | 82.6% | 81.4% | 80.3% |
| Operating Margin | 54.9% | 54.9% | 54.0% | 49.0% | 70.8% | 55.6% | 51.3% | 47.5% | 50.0% | 44.3% | 43.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 35.7% | 35.7% | 34.9% | 32.4% | 54.4% | 40.4% | 47.1% | 35.4% | 35.1% | 39.3% | 33.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 7.8% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 7.0% | 12.0% | 8.9% | 11.1% | 6.3% | 4.9% | 5.6% | 6.7% |
| ROA | 3.8% | 3.8% | 3.7% | 3.6% | 5.9% | 4.5% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.8% | 4.3% |
| ROIC | 4.6% | 4.6% | 4.6% | 4.3% | 6.3% | 5.2% | 5.1% | 4.1% | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.3% |
| ROCE | 6.3% | 6.3% | 6.4% | 5.8% | 8.5% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 6.5% | 7.5% | 7.0% | 7.5% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 0.40 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 5.75 | 5.75 | 5.40 | 5.42 | 4.51 | 4.93 | 5.38 | 5.22 | 3.28 | 3.39 | 2.74 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.78 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.39 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 5.68 | 5.68 | 5.34 | 5.40 | 4.46 | 4.73 | 4.87 | 4.99 | 2.93 | 3.21 | 2.63 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 8.21 | 7.02 | 7.33 | 7.59 | 6.75 | 6.33 | 6.17 | 6.63 | 6.38 | 7.82 |
| Interest Coverage | 2.71 | 2.71 | 2.81 | 2.91 | 3.79 | 3.08 | 2.89 | 3.02 | 3.13 | 3.66 | 3.40 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 29.85 | 29.85 | 0.35 | 2.19 | 1.19 | 1.84 | 1.73 | 1.42 | 0.93 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Quick Ratio | 29.85 | 29.85 | 0.35 | 2.19 | 1.19 | 1.84 | 1.73 | 1.42 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.63 |
| Cash Ratio | 4.71 | 4.71 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.49 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.06 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12.78 | 27.22 | 35.23 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 6.7% | 7.0% | 6.1% | 5.9% | 4.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 3.9% | 4.2% |
| Payout Ratio | 137.2% | 137.2% | 141.0% | 144.6% | 86.9% | 112.6% | 90.3% | 114.4% | 105.9% | 83.3% | 94.3% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.7% | 4.9% | 4.1% | 3.9% | 5.6% | 4.3% | 5.9% | 1.3% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 4.4% |
| FCF Yield | 7.1% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 7.2% | 5.9% | 6.0% | 7.1% | 5.7% | 5.0% | 5.6% | 4.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 6.7% | 7.1% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 5.0% | 5.0% | 5.4% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.0% | 4.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $56M | $55M | $50M | $47M | $45M | $42M | $41M | $40M | $37M | $34M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GTY stock.
Getty Realty Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 21.4x. The historical average is 22.5x. This places it at the 59th percentile of its historical range.
Getty Realty Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 15.4x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.4x.
Getty Realty Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 7.8%. The historical average is 11.6%.
Based on historical data, Getty Realty Corp. is trading at a P/E of 21.4x. This is at the 59th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Getty Realty Corp.'s current dividend yield is 6.66% with a payout ratio of 137.2%.
Getty Realty Corp. has 40.2% gross margin and 54.9% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Getty Realty Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 5.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
AFFO negative from heavy capex
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Specialty Discount Persists Despite Growth
GTY trades at 18.6x forward P/FFO, a discount to EPRT's 24.4x and ADC's 42.1x, per reported figures, reflecting market skepticism on fuel asset terminal value.
The P/FFO multiple of 18.6x in 2026Q2 sits below the peer average of roughly 22x, suggesting investors are pricing in a 'specialty discount' tied to the energy transition. This discount appears unwarranted given the hard-corner real estate's alternative use potential, but it may persist until the market sees concrete evidence of non-fuel conversions. The implied cap rate, derived from NOI and enterprise value, likely exceeds the 6-7% range typical of generalist triple-net peers, offering a yield premium that compensates for perceived environmental and regulatory risks.
NOI Margin Volatility Masks Core Stability
NOI margin swung from 95.4% in 2025Q2 to -82.9% in 2025Q4, then recovered to 63.5% in 2026Q2, as reported in financial statements, suggesting non-recurring charges distorting property-level profitability.
The extreme margin swings are likely driven by one-time environmental remediation provisions or portfolio repositioning charges, not operational deterioration. The 63.5% NOI margin in 2026Q2, while below the 90%+ levels seen in 2024, still reflects the triple-net model's efficiency, where tenants absorb most variable costs. The discrepancy between gross margin (~40%) and operating margin (~55%) warrants scrutiny, as it may indicate that environmental costs are being classified above the NOI line, potentially understating true property profitability.
AFFO Swing Threatens Dividend Coverage
FFO payout ratio improved to 76.8% in 2026Q2 from 88.9% in 2025Q2, but AFFO turned deeply negative at -$111.5M, per reported financials, implying a payout ratio far above 100% and raising questions about sustainability.
The negative AFFO in 2026Q2 is primarily due to a $150.8M capex surge, which may include acquisition costs rather than pure maintenance spending. If that capex is growth-oriented, the dividend remains covered by core FFO, but the reported AFFO figure suggests otherwise. Investors should monitor whether the company clarifies the capex breakdown; if the negative AFFO persists, the 5.8% dividend yield may be at risk despite the historically stable payout.
Debt Creeps Toward Covenant Limits
Debt-to-equity rose to 0.95 in 2026Q2 from 0.86 in 2024Q1, as reported, with interest coverage at 2.85x, suggesting leverage is approaching levels that may constrain future acquisitions.
The debt-to-gross-assets ratio, a more REIT-appropriate metric, likely sits near 45-50%, which is elevated relative to peers like EPRT (0.60 D/E) and ADC (0.53 D/E). Interest coverage of 2.85x in 2026Q2, down from 3.22x in 2026Q1, indicates that rising rates are compressing the spread between asset yields and borrowing costs. With cash reserves thin at $4.8M, the balance sheet appears stretched, and further acquisitions may require equity issuance or asset sales to avoid breaching debt covenants.
Northeast Concentration Remains Key Vulnerability
GTY's portfolio is heavily concentrated in the U.S. Northeast, particularly New York and Massachusetts, as per reported disclosures, exposing the company to regional regulatory shifts and economic downturns.
The geographic concentration amplifies the impact of state-level environmental mandates, such as EV infrastructure requirements, which could impair the long-term utility of fuel-based assets. However, the shift toward national credit tenants like 7-Eleven and Applegreen, along with the pivot into car wash and automotive service properties, suggests management is actively diversifying the tenant base and asset types. The G&A efficiency, reflected in the high operating margin, indicates that the company is not overspending on corporate overhead despite its expansion.
P/E Misleads on Depreciation Distortion
GTY's P/E of 24.7x is misleading because depreciation on real estate assets depresses GAAP earnings, while FFO and AFFO provide a clearer picture of cash-generating ability, as reported in financial statements.
Standard P/E ratios are inappropriate for REITs because they penalize companies for non-cash depreciation charges that do not reflect the actual value of income-producing properties. For GTY, the gap between EPS and FFO is particularly pronounced, with FFO consistently exceeding net income by 1.24x to 2.48x, as per reported data. Investors should use P/FFO or P/AFFO instead, but must also adjust for the quality of AFFO, especially when maintenance capex is lumpy or acquisition-related spending is misclassified.