Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -1.1x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -26.6%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4M | $8M | $5M | $4M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $3M | $7M | $-9830050 | $3M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.67 | 3.93 | 1134.36 | 15745.31 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 0.22 | 0.60 | 0.27 | 1.18 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 3.49 | -2441.04 | 11742.54 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 89.4% | 89.4% | 100.0% | 100.0% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -254.3% | -254.3% | -91969.3% | -1568470.7% | — | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -201.8% | -201.8% | -85033.1% | -1542225.4% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -26.6% | -26.6% | -34.2% | -192.0% | -101.8% | -0.6% |
| ROA | -25.6% | -25.6% | -33.1% | -170.3% | -93.0% | -0.6% |
| ROIC | -52.2% | -52.2% | -120.1% | -250.2% | -6153.2% | — |
| ROCE | -33.5% | -33.5% | -36.9% | -195.3% | -102.0% | -0.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.07 | -0.87 | -0.30 | -0.99 | -0.99 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Net cash position: cash ($840799) exceeds total debt ($0)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 18.51 | 18.51 | 41.91 | 13.49 | 2.66 | 237.88 |
| Quick Ratio | 18.51 | 18.51 | 41.91 | 13.49 | 2.66 | 237.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 18.17 | 18.17 | 41.76 | 13.40 | 2.66 | 237.88 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | — |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 14.40 | — | 11.41 | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.5% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.5% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $7M | $2M | $987941 | $1M | $1M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying GXAI stock.
Gaxos.ai Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -1.1x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Gaxos.ai Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -26.6%. The historical average is -71.0%.
Based on historical data, Gaxos.ai Inc. is trading at a P/E of -1.1x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Gaxos.ai Inc. has 89.4% gross margin and -254.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Imminent liquidity and dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Speculative Premium Over Fundamental Reality
Based on current market data, GXAI trades at a price-to-sales multiple of 4.31, a valuation that appears disconnected from the company's negative earnings and suggests investors are pricing in significant future AI-driven growth rather than current operational performance or established revenue streams within the gaming sector.
The P/S multiple of 4.31 implies that the market is assigning a premium to the company's pivot toward generative AI, despite the lack of a proven, scalable business model. Investors should monitor whether this valuation can be sustained as the company faces the reality of its high cash burn and the need for further dilutive capital raises.
Persistent Decay in Capital Efficiency
According to historical financial data, GXAI's ROIC has remained consistently negative, reaching -14.9% in 2026Q1, which indicates that the company is currently destroying shareholder value rather than compounding it as it attempts to build out its proprietary AI-integrated gaming ecosystem and digital asset platform.
The negative ROIC trend reflects the company's inability to generate returns that exceed the cost of its development-heavy capital structure. This persistent decay suggests that the current strategy of aggressive R&D spending has yet to translate into a competitive advantage that can drive profitable growth or efficient capital utilization.
Working Capital Cycles Signal Instability
As reported in recent filings, GXAI's asset turnover ratio remains extremely low at 0.12, highlighting a structural inefficiency in converting its asset base into revenue, which is typical for early-stage firms but concerning given the company's rapid depletion of its cash reserves and limited operational scale.
The low asset turnover suggests that the company's investments in platform development are not yet yielding meaningful revenue throughput. Furthermore, the volatility in DSO and the lack of consistent DPO data indicate that the company's working capital management is likely reactive rather than strategic, leaving it vulnerable to liquidity shocks.
Liquidity Buffer Facing Rapid Erosion
Based on the 2026Q1 balance sheet, GXAI maintains a current ratio of 21.35, yet this figure masks a precarious liquidity position as the company's cash reserves are being rapidly exhausted by operating losses, leaving little room for error in its current high-burn, pre-profitability development phase.
While the high current ratio might appear healthy in isolation, it is misleading due to the company's lack of significant revenue-generating assets and its reliance on cash to fund ongoing operations. The rapid decline in cash suggests that the company may face a liquidity crisis in the near term without immediate access to additional financing.
Misapplication of Revenue Growth Metrics
Investors frequently misapply the 47,901% revenue growth figure to GXAI, failing to recognize that this metric is derived from a near-zero base and likely reflects one-time NFT events rather than the sustainable, recurring revenue streams required to justify the company's current valuation and long-term viability.
Relying on headline growth percentages obscures the underlying unit economics and the lumpy nature of digital asset sales. A more appropriate metric for this business model would be the cost per loyal user acquisition or the lifetime value of users within the gaming ecosystem, which would provide a clearer picture of operational health.