Revenue grew from $364.6M in Q2 2024 to $410.1M in Q3 2026 with operating margin holding near 61-64%, though the abrupt gross margin shift to about 65% and a 2.3% EPS decline in Q3 2026 suggest investors should verify the underlying cost classification.
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) annual income statement — 14-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'16 | Dec'15 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 1.6B | 1.62B | 1.49B | 1.35B | 1.27B | 1.2B | 1.09B | 847.6M | 712M | 579.5M | 509.8M | 565.1M | 254.8M | 269.7M | 169.7M |
| Revenue Growth % | -0.51% | 8.4% | 10.83% | 5.73% | 5.77% | 10.28% | 28.79% | 19.04% | 22.86% | 13.67% | -9.79% | 121.78% | -5.52% | 58.93% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | 394.7M | 214.1M | 203.1M | 192.5M | 181.3M | 165.6M | 156.9M | 142.5M | 126.9M | 116.5M | 99.7M | 86.1M | 44.4M | 202.8M | 101.7M |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | 13.24% | 13.61% | 14.3% | 14.24% | 13.76% | 14.37% | 16.81% | 17.82% | 20.1% | 19.56% | 15.24% | 17.43% | 75.19% | 59.93% |
| Gross Profit | 1.21B | 1.4B | 1.29B | 1.15B | 1.09B | 1.04B | 934.7M | 705.1M | 585.1M | 463M | 410.1M | 479M | 210.4M | 66.9M | 68M |
| Gross Margin % | 75.35% | 86.76% | 86.39% | 85.7% | 85.76% | 86.24% | 85.63% | 83.19% | 82.18% | 79.9% | 80.44% | 84.76% | 82.57% | 24.81% | 40.07% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | 8.87% | 11.72% | 5.65% | 5.17% | 11.07% | 32.56% | 20.51% | 26.37% | 12.9% | -14.38% | 127.66% | 214.5% | -1.62% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 200.9M | 395M | 369.8M | 336.7M | 300.7M | 311M | 358.2M | 328.5M | 206.9M | 199.9M | 203.8M | 284.1M | 175.6M | 230.7M | 141.9M |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | 24.42% | 24.79% | 25.01% | 23.62% | 25.83% | 32.81% | 38.76% | 29.06% | 34.5% | 39.98% | 50.27% | 68.92% | 85.54% | 83.62% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 25M | 28.5M | 26.1M | 26.2M | 23.1M | 22.7M | 21.1M | 52.4M | 14.1M | 13.9M | 10.4M | 9.3M | 4.9M | 13M | 11.6M |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | 1.76% | 1.75% | 1.95% | 1.81% | 1.89% | 1.93% | 6.18% | 1.98% | 2.4% | 2.04% | 1.65% | 1.92% | 4.82% | 6.84% |
| Research & Development | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 2M | 366.5M | 343.7M | 310.5M | 277.6M | 288.3M | 337.1M | 276.1M | 192.8M | 186M | 193.4M | 274.8M | 170.7M | 217.7M | 130.3M |
| Operating Income | 1.01B | 1.01B | 919M | 816.9M | 791.2M | 727.2M | 576.5M | 376.6M | 378.2M | 263.1M | 206.3M | 194.9M | 34.8M | -163.8M | -73.9M |
| Operating Margin % | 62.8% | 62.34% | 61.6% | 60.69% | 62.14% | 60.41% | 52.81% | 44.43% | 53.12% | 45.4% | 40.47% | 34.49% | 13.66% | -60.73% | -43.55% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | 9.7% | 12.5% | 3.25% | 8.8% | 26.14% | 53.08% | -0.42% | 43.75% | 27.53% | 5.85% | 460.06% | 121.25% | -121.65% | - |
| EBITDA | 1.23B | 1.22B | 1.12B | 1.01B | 972.5M | 892.8M | 733.4M | 519.1M | 505.1M | 379.6M | 306M | 281M | 79.2M | -151.3M | -59.6M |
| EBITDA Margin % | 76.68% | 75.58% | 75.21% | 74.99% | 76.38% | 74.17% | 67.19% | 61.24% | 70.94% | 65.5% | 60.02% | 49.73% | 31.08% | -56.1% | -35.12% |
| EBITDA Growth % | 1.39% | 8.92% | 11.16% | 3.79% | 8.93% | 21.73% | 41.28% | 2.77% | 33.06% | 24.05% | 8.9% | 254.8% | 152.35% | -153.86% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 222.2M | 214.1M | 203.1M | 192.5M | 181.3M | 165.6M | 156.9M | 142.5M | 126.9M | 116.5M | 99.7M | 86.1M | 44.4M | 12.5M | 14.3M |
| EBIT | 1.01B | 1.02B | 933M | 824.6M | 796.5M | 737.8M | 586.7M | 380M | 378.8M | 267.8M | 206.3M | 194.9M | 34.8M | -163.8M | -73.9M |
| Net Interest Income | -220.2M | -225.6M | -202.2M | -179M | -149.3M | -105.4M | -94.7M | -62.4M | -53.3M | -25.8M | -1.4M | -1.5M | -1.9M | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Expense | 220.2M | 225.6M | 202.2M | 179M | 149.3M | 105.4M | 94.7M | 62.4M | 53.3M | 25.8M | 1.4M | 1.5M | 1.9M | 0 | 0 |
| Other Income/Expense | -205.2M | -209.7M | -188.2M | -171.3M | -144M | -94.8M | -84.5M | -59M | -52.7M | -21.1M | -1.4M | -1.5M | -1.9M | 0 | 0 |
| Pretax Income | 800.1M | 798.4M | 730.8M | 645.6M | 647.2M | 632.4M | 492M | 317.6M | 325.5M | 242M | 204.9M | 193.4M | 32.9M | -163.8M | -73.9M |
| Pretax Margin % | 49.98% | 49.37% | 48.98% | 47.96% | 50.83% | 52.53% | 45.07% | 37.47% | 45.72% | 41.76% | 40.19% | 34.22% | 12.91% | -60.73% | -43.55% |
| Income Tax | 121.6M | 113.8M | 71.8M | 37.9M | 26.6M | 14.6M | 7.1M | -100K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 15.2% | 14.25% | 9.82% | 5.87% | 4.11% | 2.31% | 1.44% | -0.03% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Net Income | 376.7M | 352.9M | 223.1M | 118.6M | 83.9M | 46.4M | 24M | 70.1M | 69.1M | 41.2M | 204.9M | 193.4M | 32.9M | -163.8M | -73.9M |
| Net Margin % | 23.53% | 21.82% | 14.95% | 8.81% | 6.59% | 3.85% | 2.2% | 8.27% | 9.71% | 7.11% | 40.19% | 34.22% | 12.91% | -60.73% | -43.55% |
| Net Income Growth % | 14.15% | 58.18% | 88.11% | 41.36% | 80.82% | 93.33% | -65.76% | 1.45% | 67.72% | -79.89% | 5.95% | 487.84% | 120.09% | -121.65% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | 678.5M | 684.6M | 659M | 607.7M | 620.6M | 617.8M | 484.9M | 317.7M | 325.5M | 242M | 204.9M | 193.4M | 32.9M | -163.8M | -73.9M |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | -108.2M | -130.4M | -65.4M | 23M | 283.9M | 549M | 1.2B | 1.2B | 1.36B | 2.03B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | 2.93 | 2.86 | 2.49 | 2.08 | 2.01 | 1.76 | 1.31 | 1.22 | 1.27 | 0.75 | 3.76 | 3.54 | 0.60 | -3.00 | -1.35 |
| EPS Growth % | 3.55% | 14.86% | 19.71% | 3.48% | 14.2% | 34.35% | 7.38% | -3.94% | 69.33% | -80.05% | 6.21% | 490% | 120% | -122.22% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | 2.87 | 2.51 | 2.11 | 2.03 | 1.76 | 1.33 | 1.22 | 1.27 | 0.75 | 3.76 | 3.54 | 0.60 | -3.00 | -1.35 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 128.4M | 123.1M | 89M | 56.3M | 41.4M | 25.7M | 18.1M | 54.8M | 54.7M | 53.8M | 54.56M | 54.56M | 54.56M | 54.56M | 54.56M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 128.4M | 123.1M | 89M | 56.2M | 41.3M | 25.7M | 18M | 54.6M | 54.6M | 53.8M | 54.56M | 54.56M | 54.56M | 54.56M | 54.56M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | 99.23% | 105.47% | 107.5% | 108.46% | 106.47% | 131.67% | 121.83% | 116.06% | 1158.01% | 149.78% | 175.34% | 83.89% | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HESM stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Hess Midstream LP (HESM) reported total revenue of $1.62B. This represents a 853.0% increase compared to $169.7M in 2012.
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is profitable, generating $352.9M in net income for the fiscal year ending 2025 with a net profit margin of 21.8%.
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) reported an operating income of $1.01B, resulting in an operating profit margin of 62.3%. This margin reflects the operational efficiency of the business before interest and taxes.
Hess Midstream LP (HESM) generated $1.40B in gross profit for the year, representing a gross profit margin of 86.8%. This demonstrates the company's core pricing power and production efficiency.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Q3 EPS miss and leverage
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Growth Moderating From Peak Pace
Based on reported figures, HESM's revenue rose from $364.6M in Q2 2024 to $410.1M in Q3 2026, though year-over-year growth has slowed to 8.4% and the most recent quarter showed a 2.3% EPS decline.
The reported quarterly revenue series shows steady expansion, but the pace appears to be normalizing relative to the double-digit growth seen in 2025. The revenue trajectory is consistent with a fee-based, volume-linked model that may be tracking sponsor activity in the Bakken rather than pricing, since the company does not take commodity title. Investors should monitor whether throughput growth can keep pace without fresh sponsor drilling commitments.
Gross Margin Reset Reflects Accounting Shift
Gross margin fell from roughly 86-87% through 2025 to about 65% in Q3 2026, a step change that may reflect reclassification of cost lines rather than an operating deterioration, as reported in the income statement.
The abrupt move in gross margin in Q1 2026 coincides with a sharp drop in reported COGS, which may indicate a change in how costs are allocated between cost of revenue and other operating lines rather than a true shift in unit economics. Operating margin has held in the 61-64% range throughout, which suggests the underlying cost base has been relatively stable. Analysts should confirm the classification change before drawing conclusions about structural pricing power relative to peers.
Operating Income Tracks Revenue Closely
Operating income of $262.4M on $410.1M revenue in Q3 2026 implies a 64.0% operating margin, and SG&A of only $6.0M suggests very limited overhead intensity relative to the revenue base.
Because SG&A remains a small fraction of revenue, operating income appears to scale almost one-for-one with revenue, indicating high fixed-cost absorption typical of pipeline infrastructure. The lack of meaningful operating leverage upside in recent quarters suggests that margin expansion would depend on volume growth rather than overhead efficiency. This profile implies earnings are sensitive to throughput rather than to cost discipline.
Net Income Conversion Is Tax and Interest Sensitive
Net income of $99.4M against $262.4M operating income in Q3 2026 implies a substantial gap from interest and other items, which warrants review given the reported debt-to-equity ratio of 8.61.
The conversion from operating income to net income appears heavily influenced by financing costs, consistent with the elevated leverage profile. Stock-based compensation is minimal, so dilution-related quality concerns appear limited. The Q3 2026 EPS miss of $0.77 versus an estimated $0.86 may indicate that below-the-line items are absorbing more of the operating gains than expected.
Sponsor Concentration and Leverage Risks
The most material challenge is that a Debt-to-Equity ratio of 8.61 and an EPS decline in Q3 2026 could signal that earnings resilience depends heavily on continued sponsor volumes and interest costs.
Short-sellers would likely focus on the captive-customer structure, arguing that volume durability rests on a single sponsor's drilling decisions rather than diversified third-party demand. The elevated leverage implies limited flexibility if throughput softens or refinancing costs rise. Investors should monitor whether the maintained guidance holds in light of the Q3 miss and any changes in sponsor activity under Chevron ownership.