Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -3.0x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE N/A. (2017–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $120M | $241M | $241M | $305M | $392M | $529M | $1.9B | $667M | $442M | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $223M | $337M | $343M | $406M | $464M | $595M | $1.9B | $687M | $362M | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -3.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.38 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.96 | 1.23 | 1.71 | 8.84 | 3.84 | 3.10 | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.92 | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 15.17 | 30.32 | 30.32 | — | 151.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.06 | 1.07 | 1.28 | 1.45 | 1.93 | 8.91 | 3.96 | 2.54 | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 75.0% | 75.0% | 75.0% | 74.5% | 76.3% | 76.3% | 73.0% | 67.7% | 65.2% | 58.6% | 55.5% |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | -12.3% | -12.3% | -18.7% | -17.2% | -28.8% | -34.8% | -66.5% | -101.1% | -162.0% | -245.3% |
| Net Profit Margin | -18.6% | -18.6% | -18.6% | -25.8% | -23.7% | -34.2% | -40.3% | -72.5% | -108.3% | -162.7% | -245.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -346.6% | — | — |
| ROA | -26.4% | -26.4% | -26.4% | -37.2% | -32.3% | -43.6% | -39.1% | -49.3% | -68.9% | -120.4% | -132.8% |
| ROIC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ROCE | — | — | — | — | — | — | -156.8% | -106.9% | -160.1% | -516.2% | -445.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.18 | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -1.79 | — | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | -4.78 | -7.58 | — | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 1.12 | 1.77 | 0.88 | 1.06 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.89 | 1.12 | 1.77 | 0.88 | 1.06 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 1.27 | 0.48 | 0.71 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.48 | 1.41 | 1.27 | 0.97 | 0.80 | 0.49 | 0.70 | 0.54 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 97.82 | 97.82 | 82.37 | 76.89 | 93.37 | 83.83 | 100.97 | 124.06 | 119.34 | 109.19 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 2.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.7% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $41M | $41M | $36M | $36M | $34M | $29M | $28M | $16M | $25M | $25M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HUCK stock.
Huckleberry.ai, Inc. Class B's current P/E ratio is -3.0x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Based on historical data, Huckleberry.ai, Inc. Class B is trading at a P/E of -3.0x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Huckleberry.ai, Inc. Class B has 75.0% gross margin and -12.3% operating margin.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Stockholders deficit with thin liquidity
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Negative Earnings Leave Multiples Unanchored
Based on the reported figures, Domo trades at a trailing P/E of -2.11 and a price-to-sales ratio of 0.40, a sales multiple that appears low relative to peers but offers limited earnings-based anchoring because net losses persist across all ten quarters.
With negative trailing earnings, the P/E ratio carries no meaningful signal and the market appears to be pricing the equity largely on revenue, where the 0.40 P/S sits well below the peer set's higher multiples. The forward EV/EBITDA of 34.93 implies the market expects a material improvement in operating earnings that the recent operating margins of -3.1% to -26.8% do not yet demonstrate. Investors should monitor whether the sales multiple reflects a discount for a stagnant franchise or a mispricing that depends on margin recovery.
Gross Margin Strength Undone by Opex
As reported in the financial statements, Domo's gross margin of 68.8% to 77.1% compares favorably with peers, yet operating margin has remained negative in every quarter, ranging from -26.8% in 2025Q1 to -3.1% in 2027Q2.
The gross margin band suggests the underlying subscription economics retain pricing power, which is a structural positive for a software business. The persistent gap between gross and operating margin points to an operating expense base that has not scaled down in line with flat revenue of roughly $77M to $80M per quarter. Stock-based compensation further inflates the cost base, so true earning power is likely weaker than the headline recovery in operating margin implies.
Returns Remain Deeply Negative Across Periods
Based on the reported figures, return on assets has been negative in all ten quarters, reaching -12.1% in 2025Q1 and -5.2% in 2027Q2, while ROE and ROIC are unavailable because of the stockholders' deficit.
The negative ROA trend indicates that the asset base is not generating returns, and the improvement from -12.1% to -5.2% largely reflects smaller losses rather than improved efficiency. With ROE undefined due to the equity deficit, the usual compounding framework does not apply, and the analysis must rely on ROA and margin trends. The absence of positive returns on any measured capital base suggests the franchise has not yet demonstrated that incremental invested capital earns above its cost.
Debt Consumes Most of the Asset Base
According to recent SEC filings, Domo carries total debt of $146.8M against total assets of $175.0M in 2027Q2, a ratio that suggests debt now absorbs most of the asset base while interest coverage is largely unavailable.
Debt representing the bulk of total assets, alongside a stockholders' deficit of roughly -$187.3M, may indicate limited financial flexibility should operating performance deteriorate further. Interest coverage is reported as unavailable for most periods, so the debt service burden cannot be assessed with confidence from the supplied data. Investors should monitor refinancing timelines and any covenant terms, though the provided data does not disclose these, so conclusions here remain inferential.
Current Ratio Sub-Parity Signals Tight Buffer
As reported in the financial statements, Domo's current ratio fell to 0.28 in 2027Q2 from 0.52 in 2025Q1, with cash of $25.1M set against deferred revenue of $146.2M, indicating a thin liquidity buffer.
A current ratio well below 1.0 is common in subscription software because deferred revenue is a current liability that is serviced through delivery rather than cash outflow, so the ratio overstates stress relative to a hardware business. However, the decline from 0.52 to 0.28 combined with shrinking deferred revenue from $181.1M to $146.2M may suggest slower billings and reduced forward commitments. Under severe stress, the $25.1M cash position appears modest relative to near-term obligations, warranting further investigation of the timing of liabilities.
Misapplied Metric: Stock-Adjusted Earnings Multiples
Based on the reported figures, the metric most often misapplied to Domo is EV/EBITDA, which excludes stock-based compensation that represents a substantial recurring cost, flattering the apparent multiple.
Because stock-based compensation reached $15.2M in 2026Q4 and is excluded from EBITDA-based valuation, the forward EV/EBITDA of 34.93 may understate the true economic cost of the business. Free cash flow per share after dilution, or EV/sales adjusted for stock comp as a percentage of revenue, would give a more conservative view of value. This suggests investors should treat headline EBITDA multiples with caution when evaluating a company with a persistent operating loss profile.