Hycroft remains pre-revenue with no sales for ten consecutive quarters, and net losses widened to $20.8M in 2026Q2, though stock-based compensation of $13.0M suggests a significant non-cash component to the reported loss.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) annual income statement — 12-year revenue, gross profit & net income history
| Metric | TTM | Dec'25 | Dec'24 | Dec'23 | Dec'22 | Dec'21 | Dec'20 | Dec'19 | Dec'18 | Dec'17 | Dec'14 | Dec'13 | Dec'12 |
|---|
| Sales/Revenue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33.23M | 110.73M | 47.04M | 13.71M | 0 | 0 | 310.43M | 267.9M | 214.56M |
| Revenue Growth % | - | - | - | -100% | -69.99% | 135.38% | 243.16% | - | - | -100% | 15.87% | 24.86% | - |
| Cost of Goods Sold | -618K | 29.51M | 12.12M | 14.04M | 48.89M | 163.34M | 109.62M | 30.67M | 5.06M | 4.42M | 281.94M | 178.06M | 94.9M |
| COGS % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | 147.12% | 147.5% | 233.02% | 223.71% | - | - | 90.82% | 66.47% | 44.23% |
| Gross Profit | 618K | -29.51M | -12.12M | -14.04M | -15.66M | -52.6M | -62.58M | -16.96M | -5.06M | -4.42M | 28.48M | 89.84M | 119.66M |
| Gross Margin % | - | - | - | - | -47.12% | -47.5% | -133.02% | -123.71% | - | - | 9.18% | 33.53% | 55.77% |
| Gross Profit Growth % | - | -143.48% | 13.71% | 10.31% | 70.23% | 15.94% | -268.97% | -235.18% | -14.35% | -115.54% | -68.3% | -24.92% | - |
| Operating Expenses | 99.21M | 14.96M | 31.7M | 30.97M | 37.83M | 31.31M | 26.79M | 16.92M | 609.58K | 28.51M | 502.77M | 74.29M | 38.5M |
| OpEx % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | 113.85% | 28.27% | 56.94% | 123.41% | - | - | 161.96% | 27.73% | 17.94% |
| Selling, General & Admin | 64.4M | 14.48M | 14.47M | 12.67M | 14.37M | 14.62M | 21.08M | 13.78M | 14.3M | 15.22M | 23.25M | 22.48M | 23.64M |
| SG&A % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | 43.24% | 13.2% | 44.82% | 100.52% | - | - | 7.49% | 8.39% | 11.02% |
| Research & Development | 23.71M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| R&D % of Revenue | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Other Operating Expenses | 3M | 482K | 17.23M | 18.3M | 23.46M | 16.69M | 5.71M | 3.2M | -11.21M | 0 | 485.36M | 0 | 0 |
| Operating Income | -98.59M | -44.47M | -43.82M | -45.01M | -53.49M | -83.91M | -89.37M | -33.94M | -610K | -2.78K | -56.86M | 35.61M | 80.87M |
| Operating Margin % | - | - | - | - | -160.97% | -75.78% | -189.96% | -247.58% | - | - | -18.32% | 13.29% | 37.69% |
| Operating Income Growth % | - | -1.47% | 2.64% | 15.85% | 36.25% | 6.1% | -163.3% | -5464.1% | -21842.45% | 100% | -259.68% | -55.97% | - |
| EBITDA | -96.31M | -42.44M | -41.59M | -42.2M | -50.13M | -75.48M | -83.52M | -31.86M | 5.17M | 5.55M | 5.24M | 67.36M | 96.03M |
| EBITDA Margin % | - | - | - | - | -150.87% | -68.17% | -177.53% | -232.42% | - | - | 1.69% | 25.14% | 44.75% |
| EBITDA Growth % | -215.8% | -2.05% | 1.44% | 15.83% | 33.58% | 9.62% | -162.11% | -716.9% | -6.91% | 5.96% | -92.23% | -29.85% | - |
| D&A (Non-Cash Add-back) | 2.28M | 2.02M | 2.23M | 2.81M | 3.36M | 8.43M | 5.85M | 2.08M | 5.78M | 5.55M | 62.09M | 31.75M | 15.16M |
| EBIT | -82.08M | -29.75M | -41.08M | -37.02M | -43.04M | -75.54M | -94.91M | -36.1M | 2.23M | -2.78K | -56.86M | 35.61M | 80.87M |
| Net Interest Income | 2.55M | -6.64M | -15.55M | -10.19M | -16.17M | -20.59M | -43.26M | -64.05M | -2.84M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Interest Income | 6.67M | 4.38M | 4.42M | 8.28M | 2.31M | 0 | 199K | 797K | 8.3K | 0 | 39.81M | 22.21M | 17.01M |
| Interest Expense | 4.12M | 11.03M | 19.97M | 18.47M | 18.48M | 20.59M | 43.46M | 64.85M | 2.85M | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Income/Expense | 12.39M | 3.8M | -17.07M | -10.01M | -7.34M | -6.18M | -47.03M | -64.95M | 2.85M | -2.78K | -33.98M | -23.22M | -16.72B |
| Pretax Income | -86.2M | -40.66M | -60.9M | -55.02M | -60.83M | -90.09M | -136.39M | -98.89M | 2.23M | -2.78K | -514.1M | -6.66M | 64.15M |
| Pretax Margin % | - | - | - | - | -183.06% | -81.36% | -289.92% | -721.39% | - | - | -165.61% | -2.49% | 29.9% |
| Income Tax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.53M | 0 | 0 | 555.45K | 145K | 4.83M | -8.07M | 16.42M |
| Effective Tax Rate % | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.7% | 0% | 0% | 24.85% | -5215.83% | -0.94% | 121.09% | 25.6% |
| Net Income | -86.2M | -40.66M | -60.9M | -55.02M | -60.83M | -88.56M | -136.39M | -98.89M | 1.68M | -2.78K | -518.92M | 1.41M | 47.73M |
| Net Margin % | - | - | - | - | -183.06% | -79.98% | -289.92% | -721.39% | - | - | -167.17% | 0.52% | 22.24% |
| Net Income Growth % | -70.83% | 33.22% | -10.67% | 9.54% | 31.32% | 35.07% | -37.92% | -5986.61% | 60531.65% | 100% | -37034.16% | -97.06% | - |
| Net Income (Continuing) | -86.2M | -40.66M | -60.9M | -55.02M | -60.83M | -88.56M | -136.39M | -98.89M | 1.68M | -2.78K | -518.92M | 1.41M | 47.73M |
| Discontinued Operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EPS (Diluted) | -0.94 | -0.94 | -2.63 | -2.61 | -3.58 | -14.74 | -39.20 | -3279.50 | -211.00 | 0.00 | -49.00 | 0.10 | 0.52 |
| EPS Growth % | 39.81% | 64.26% | -0.77% | 27.1% | 75.71% | 62.4% | 98.8% | -1454.27% | - | 100% | -49100% | -80.77% | - |
| EPS (Basic) | - | -0.94 | -2.63 | -2.61 | -3.58 | -14.74 | -39.16 | -3279.45 | -210.96 | 0.00 | -48.99 | 0.14 | 0.53 |
| Diluted Shares Outstanding | 91.5M | 43.26M | 23.18M | 21.11M | 16.98M | 6.01M | 3.48M | 30.16K | 264.52K | 0 | 10.59M | 10.08M | 91.03M |
| Basic Shares Outstanding | 91.5M | 43.26M | 23.15M | 21.08M | 16.98M | 6.01M | 3.48M | 30K | 264K | 0 | 10.59M | 14.05M | 91.78M |
| Dividend Payout Ratio | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying HYMC stock.
For fiscal year 2025, Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) reported total revenue of $0.0M. This represents a 100.0% decline compared to $214.6M in 2012.
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) reported a net loss of $40.7M for the fiscal year ending 2025.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Cash burn before feasibility
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Revenue Absent, Cash Burn Deepens
Hycroft reported no revenue for the tenth consecutive quarter, with net losses widening to $20.8M in 2026Q2, according to the latest income statement data, underscoring a development-stage trajectory with no near-term sales visibility.
The absence of revenue is consistent with the company's transition from heap leach operations to a sulfide-focused exploration program. The sequential increase in net loss from $48.3M in 2026Q1 to $20.8M in 2026Q2 appears to reflect a reduction in one-time charges, but the underlying cash burn remains substantial. Investors should monitor whether the exploration program can convert capital into resource value before the cash cushion erodes further.
No Gross Margin, Only Costs
Gross profit is negative in every reported quarter, with 2026Q2 showing a $5.1M credit due to a COGS reversal, as per financial statements, indicating that the company has no production economics to analyze.
The negative gross margins are a direct result of zero revenue and ongoing care-and-maintenance costs. The $5.1M credit in 2026Q2 likely represents a reversal of prior inventory write-downs, not an improvement in operational efficiency. Without a producing asset, gross margin analysis is moot; the focus must shift to the cost of advancing the sulfide project.
Fixed Costs Dominate, No Operating Leverage
Operating losses averaged $15.4M per quarter over the last five quarters, with SG&A and R&D comprising the bulk of expenditures, as reported in the income statement, highlighting a cost structure with no revenue to absorb fixed overhead.
The company's operating leverage is inherently negative at this stage, as every dollar spent on exploration and administration widens the operating loss. The spike in SG&A to $34.2M in 2026Q1, likely due to non-recurring items, was followed by a normalization to $15.2M in 2026Q2, but the trend suggests ongoing volatility. The absence of revenue means that any future production would need to generate substantial gross profit to cover these fixed costs.
Losses Driven by Non-Cash Charges
Net losses in 2026Q2 were $20.8M, but stock-based compensation of $13.0M, as per the income statement, suggests that a significant portion of the reported loss is non-cash, potentially overstating the true cash burn.
The high level of stock-based compensation, particularly in 2026Q1 and Q2, indicates that the company is using equity to compensate employees and preserve cash. This practice dilutes existing shareholders but may be a deliberate strategy to extend the cash runway. The negative EPS of -$0.23 in 2026Q2, despite a 46.5% improvement, still reflects a deteriorating equity base. Investors should adjust for SBC to assess the actual cash consumption.
Exploration and G&A Burn Accelerates
R&D spending jumped to $8.6M in 2026Q2 from zero in prior quarters, while SG&A remained elevated at $15.2M, according to the income statement, indicating a strategic pivot toward metallurgical testing and feasibility work.
The initiation of R&D expenses in 2026Q2 marks a clear shift from pure exploration to process development, which is critical for the sulfide project. However, the combined SG&A and R&D of $23.8M in 2026Q2 represents a significant increase from the $2.6M SG&A in 2025Q3, suggesting that the company is scaling up its technical team. This cost escalation is necessary but raises the urgency to complete a bankable feasibility study before the cash cushion is depleted.
2026Q2 Marks Shift to Sulfide Testing
The first R&D expenditure of $8.6M in 2026Q2, as reported in the income statement, signals a pivotal move from exploration to metallurgical testing, potentially setting the stage for a feasibility study.
This quarter represents a strategic inflection point where the company began allocating capital to process development, a prerequisite for any future production decision. The concurrent reduction in net loss from the prior quarter, despite higher R&D, suggests improved cost control elsewhere. The lasting impact will depend on whether these tests yield recovery rates that justify the construction of a large-scale mill.
Cash Burn Outpaces Milestones
With $181.7M in cash and an average quarterly burn of $20M, as per the latest balance sheet and income statement, Hycroft may have less than two years of runway before needing dilutive financing.
The company's cash position appears sufficient for near-term operations, but the escalating R&D and SG&A costs could accelerate the burn rate. If the feasibility study is delayed or yields unfavorable results, the company may be forced to raise capital at depressed valuations. The lack of revenue and reliance on equity funding makes the stock highly sensitive to sentiment and metal prices, which could lead to significant dilution for existing shareholders.