Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 42.6x · EV/EBITDA 29.7x · ROE 39.7%. (1997–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.7B | $8.0B | $4.1B | $1.3B | $577M | $964M | $670M | $439M | $413M | $373M | $383M |
| Enterprise Value | $12.8B | $8.1B | $4.0B | $1.3B | $689M | $1.0B | $649M | $420M | $417M | $374M | $379M |
| P/E Ratio → | 42.57 | 26.48 | 20.18 | 14.51 | 19.18 | 14.46 | 16.13 | 13.21 | — | 27.90 | 3.17 |
| P/S Ratio | 3.78 | 2.38 | 1.41 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 0.63 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.55 |
| P/B Ratio | 14.53 | 9.04 | 6.25 | 2.69 | 1.48 | 2.60 | 2.35 | 1.76 | 1.85 | 1.55 | 1.70 |
| P/FCF | 58.22 | 36.67 | 21.53 | 9.87 | — | 31.60 | 9.31 | 13.55 | 54.39 | 21.05 | 17.71 |
| P/OCF | 44.53 | 28.05 | 17.39 | 8.74 | 35.41 | 25.43 | 8.74 | 11.35 | 33.88 | 16.70 | 15.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.39 | 1.40 | 0.56 | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 29.67 | 18.72 | 11.94 | 7.03 | 8.46 | 9.52 | 10.36 | 8.17 | 11.95 | 12.49 | 12.35 |
| EV / EBIT | 33.30 | 20.38 | 13.20 | 8.24 | 12.36 | 11.91 | 12.99 | 10.09 | 16.02 | 18.22 | 15.34 |
| EV / FCF | — | 36.81 | 21.33 | 9.77 | — | 33.54 | 9.01 | 12.98 | 54.82 | 21.11 | 17.54 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 25.5% | 25.5% | 24.2% | 18.7% | 14.7% | 18.7% | 19.1% | 16.9% | 17.1% | 17.3% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 11.4% | 10.4% | 6.7% | 2.6% | 5.6% | 4.2% | 3.9% | 3.0% | 2.5% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 9.1% | 9.1% | 7.6% | 4.6% | 1.6% | 4.3% | 3.5% | 3.1% | -1.6% | 1.7% | 17.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 39.7% | 39.7% | 38.0% | 24.3% | 9.1% | 20.3% | 15.6% | 14.0% | -6.1% | 5.8% | 74.0% |
| ROA | 21.5% | 21.5% | 19.7% | 11.3% | 4.1% | 10.0% | 8.3% | 7.7% | -3.4% | 3.3% | 39.0% |
| ROIC | 37.5% | 37.5% | 41.0% | 24.2% | 9.0% | 18.5% | 15.2% | 13.7% | 8.3% | 6.6% | 13.3% |
| ROCE | 45.6% | 45.6% | 46.2% | 28.7% | 11.3% | 22.1% | 17.6% | 16.5% | 9.8% | 7.6% | 13.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.33 | 1.68 | 0.77 | 0.51 | 0.01 | 0.85 | 0.98 | 0.95 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.03 | -0.06 | -0.03 | 0.29 | 0.16 | -0.08 | -0.07 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.07 | 0.07 | -0.11 | -0.07 | 1.38 | 0.55 | -0.35 | -0.36 | 0.10 | 0.04 | -0.12 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.14 | -0.20 | -0.10 | — | 1.94 | -0.30 | -0.58 | 0.44 | 0.06 | -0.17 |
| Interest Coverage | 217.87 | 217.87 | 228.49 | 53.46 | 18.78 | 89.26 | 64.25 | 22.44 | 13.36 | 12.05 | 19.27 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.71 | 1.71 | 1.67 | 1.68 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.53 | 1.53 | 1.60 | 1.54 | 1.58 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.47 | 1.44 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.43 | 1.42 | 1.47 | 1.43 | 1.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 2.11 | 2.32 | 2.42 | 2.32 | 2.00 | 2.12 | 2.42 | 2.08 | 1.91 | 1.76 |
| Inventory Turnover | 22.52 | 22.52 | 21.51 | 20.20 | 19.18 | 18.21 | 38.69 | 41.54 | 34.67 | 39.60 | 42.99 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 78.09 | 78.43 | 75.14 | 82.18 | 88.24 | 86.99 | 83.15 | 86.31 | 80.03 | 83.94 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 3.8% | 5.0% | 6.9% | 5.2% | 6.9% | 6.2% | 7.6% | — | 3.6% | 31.6% |
| FCF Yield | 1.7% | 2.7% | 4.6% | 10.1% | — | 3.2% | 10.7% | 7.4% | 1.8% | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.3% | 0.5% | 1.1% | 0.6% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $40M | $41M | $41M | $42M | $42M | $42M | $43M | $42M | $43M | $43M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 29 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IESC stock.
IES Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 42.6x. The historical average is 46.1x. This places it at the 69th percentile of its historical range.
IES Holdings, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 29.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 15.8x.
IES Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 39.7%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -3.2%.
Based on historical data, IES Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 42.6x. This is at the 69th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
IES Holdings, Inc. has 25.5% gross margin and 11.4% operating margin. Operating margin between 10-20% is typical for established companies.
IES Holdings, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Valuation extreme vs. peers
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Valuation Reflects Data Center Optionality
The stock trades at a P/E TTM of 44.4x, a significant premium to peers like MYR Group (41.1x) and Primoris (15.3x), but the Forward P/E of 17.0x and PEG of 0.89 suggest the market is pricing in substantial future earnings growth, as reported in recent market data.
The valuation disconnect between the trailing and forward P/E implies analysts are forecasting a near-doubling of earnings, likely driven by the Communications segment's data center boom. However, the EV/EBITDA of 31.0x is steep compared to the peer median, indicating the premium is not solely a function of expected growth but also reflects a possible re-rating from a cyclical E&C firm to a specialized infrastructure provider. Investors must determine if this multiple expansion is sustainable or has already priced in the favorable cycle.
Mix Shift Driving Margin Expansion
Operating margins have expanded sharply to 14.4% in Q3 2026 from 12.6% a year prior, while gross margins reached 27.4%, indicating a favorable project mix toward higher-value, technical work in the Communications and Infrastructure segments, as per recent financial statements.
The 200-basis-point year-over-year improvement in operating margin demonstrates strong operating leverage, where incremental revenue is dropping to the bottom line at an improved rate. This trend suggests management's mix shift toward complex data center projects is structurally improving the earning power of the business. The key risk is that these higher margins are cyclical and tied to a peak in data center capital spending, rather than representing a permanent step-change in profitability.
ROIC Inflects on Operational Leverage
Return on Invested Capital surged to 11.3% in Q3 2026 from 10.7% in Q3 2025, driven by expanding operating margins and efficient asset utilization, indicating the business is generating higher returns on its capital base, as shown in reported ratio data.
The ROIC expansion, coupled with a strong ROE of 13.2%, signals that the company is successfully compounding returns rather than merely growing its asset base. The primary driver appears to be margin expansion from the mix shift, rather than a significant improvement in asset turnover, which has actually declined slightly. This implies the return improvement is earnings-driven, which is generally higher quality than efficiency-driven gains in the construction sector.
Working Capital Swings Obscure Core Efficiency
The Cash Conversion Cycle shortened to 26 days in Q3 2026 from 66 days a year ago, primarily due to improved Days Payable Outstanding of 55 days, suggesting stronger supplier payment terms or project billing timing, based on the latest quarter's data.
The dramatic reduction in CCC is a positive signal for cash flow generation potential, as the company is holding cash for longer. However, the volatility in this metric, with swings from 26 to 66 days over the past year, underscores the project-based nature of the business and makes it an unreliable indicator of permanent efficiency gains. The improvement is largely driven by payables, not receivables, which warrants monitoring to ensure it doesn't strain supplier relationships.
Fortress Balance Sheet Preserves Optionality
The debt-to-equity ratio stands at an exceptionally low 0.06, with interest coverage of 177.3x, indicating the company operates with minimal financial leverage and has a robust capacity to fund growth internally or through debt, as evidenced by recent balance sheet data.
This near-zero leverage profile is a significant competitive advantage, providing insulation from rising interest rates and ample capacity for bolt-on acquisitions. It appears to be a deliberate strategic choice by management, prioritizing balance sheet strength over financial engineering. The primary risk is that extreme conservatism could be a drag on returns on equity, as the company is not utilizing low-cost debt to amplify shareholder returns in a low-rate environment, though this is less relevant in the current rate cycle.
Return on Equity Distorted by Leverage
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 13.2% appears moderate, but it is artificially suppressed by the company's fortress-like balance sheet with a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.06, making ROIC a far more accurate measure of core operational performance, as reported in financial statements.
In a sector where peers often use moderate leverage, a low-DE company like IESC will typically show a lower ROE than competitors with identical operating performance. For example, Primoris (PRIM) has a D/E of 0.76 and an ROE of 8.5%. Therefore, directly comparing IESC's ROE to levered peers is misleading. The most appropriate metric for judging IESC's operational efficiency is ROIC or Return on Assets, which isolate performance from capital structure. Using ROE here would obscure the true strength of the company's earning power and asset efficiency.