Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 11.2x · EV/EBITDA 7.7x · ROE 15.6%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.9B | $4.7B | $3.4B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $3.0B | $3.7B | $4.7B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $6.1B | $5.5B | $3.0B | $3.8B | $183M | $-3869690780 | $-4614133550 | $4.0B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 11.22 | 2.60 | 2.58 | 2.35 | 1.63 | 1.70 | 9.74 | 3.23 | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.86 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 0.75 | 0.95 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.65 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.52 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 15.54 | 3.62 | — | 1.03 | — | 2.80 | 0.29 | 3.19 | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 11.10 | 2.59 | — | 0.88 | — | 2.26 | 0.29 | 2.79 | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.78 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 0.03 | -0.73 | -0.93 | 0.82 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.66 | 2.00 | 1.44 | 2.20 | 0.07 | -1.45 | -7.38 | 1.85 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 9.05 | 2.38 | 1.81 | 2.82 | 0.08 | -1.62 | -12.95 | 2.10 | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 4.23 | — | 1.55 | — | -3.56 | -0.36 | 2.77 | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 84.8% | 84.8% | 73.5% | 69.0% | 86.6% | 92.8% | 51.6% | 84.7% | 85.0% | 79.1% | 79.4% |
| Operating Margin | 32.8% | 32.8% | 25.2% | 21.4% | 37.1% | 45.1% | 7.2% | 39.1% | 34.8% | 33.6% | 33.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 25.6% | 25.6% | 19.9% | 17.1% | 28.6% | 33.7% | 7.7% | 29.2% | 24.5% | 25.7% | 24.8% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 15.6% | 15.6% | 12.4% | 11.0% | 18.4% | 20.2% | 4.3% | 18.0% | 16.8% | 19.0% | 20.0% |
| ROA | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 2.0% | 0.5% | 2.1% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| ROIC | 7.3% | 7.3% | 5.7% | 5.0% | 8.4% | 9.5% | 1.4% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 8.0% | 7.9% |
| ROCE | 3.5% | 3.5% | 4.2% | 3.5% | 6.4% | 6.7% | 0.9% | 6.0% | 5.3% | 6.5% | 7.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 1.05 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 1.34 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.64 | 4.64 | 5.74 | 6.30 | 4.19 | 3.83 | 15.70 | 4.26 | 5.02 | 5.18 | 4.81 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | -0.03 | 0.13 | -0.27 | -0.79 | -0.93 | -0.07 | 0.14 | -0.33 | -1.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.29 | 0.29 | -0.18 | 0.74 | -1.01 | -2.59 | -13.36 | -0.28 | 0.58 | -1.29 | -3.63 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.61 | — | 0.52 | — | -6.36 | -0.66 | -0.42 | — | -0.61 | -4.27 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.71 | 0.54 | 1.37 | 2.42 | 0.32 | 1.41 | 1.36 | 1.24 | 1.21 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.07 | 2.07 | 0.06 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 0.59 |
| Quick Ratio | 2.07 | 2.07 | 0.06 | 0.73 | 0.70 | 0.66 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.92 | 0.59 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.89 | 1.89 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 2.0% | 8.6% | 12.7% | 20.3% | 27.7% | 20.8% | 18.7% | 14.0% | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 22.3% | 22.3% | 32.9% | 47.7% | 45.1% | 35.4% | 182.2% | 45.4% | 47.1% | 46.3% | 52.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 8.9% | 38.5% | 38.8% | 42.5% | 61.2% | 58.8% | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.4% | 27.6% | — | 96.9% | — | 35.7% | 341.3% | 31.3% | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 5.5% | 3.7% | 3.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.3% | 14.1% | 16.4% | 23.5% | 27.7% | 20.8% | 18.8% | 14.1% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $112M | $114M | $115M | $115M | $115M | $115M | $113M | $110M | $107M | $108M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IFS stock.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 11.2x. The historical average is 3.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 7.7x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 1.5x.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 15.6%. The historical average is 20.9%.
Based on historical data, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. is trading at a P/E of 11.2x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.'s current dividend yield is 1.99% with a payout ratio of 22.3%.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc. has 84.8% gross margin and 32.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Peruvian macro and credit cycle sensitivity
Discount to Peers Despite Earnings Surge
IFS trades at a P/B of 1.70, a significant discount to regional peers like Credicorp (2.76) and Santander Chile (2.76), suggesting the market is not fully pricing in the recent acceleration in ROE to 9.4% and the structural advantages of its ecosystem model.
The current P/B multiple implies the market is assigning a lower franchise value to IFS relative to its Peruvian and Latin American peers, despite a recent and sharp improvement in profitability metrics. This discount may reflect concerns about the sustainability of the NIM expansion or the higher perceived risk of its retail-focused loan book. The forward P/E of 2.71 appears exceptionally low and warrants scrutiny, as it may be distorted by non-recurring items or accounting adjustments within the insurance segment, making P/B the more reliable valuation anchor for this bank.
ROE Recovery Driven by NIM and Leverage
ROE surged to 9.4% in 2026Q2, a significant recovery from the 3.7% average of the prior two quarters, primarily driven by a sharp expansion in NIM to 2.3% and a stable equity multiplier, as reported in the latest financial statements.
The DuPont decomposition reveals that the recent profitability improvement is overwhelmingly a function of net interest margin expansion, which more than doubled from the 1.1% level seen in 2025Q3. This suggests the bank is successfully repricing its asset book or benefiting from a favorable rate environment, though the sustainability of this NIM level is critical. The contribution from fee income remains volatile, as evidenced by the wide swings in the fee percentage, indicating that core operational efficiency, not non-interest revenue, is the current driver of ROE.
NIM Expansion Outpaces Efficiency Gains
The net interest margin expanded dramatically to 2.3% in 2026Q2 from 1.2% in the prior quarter, while the efficiency ratio improved to 47.2%, indicating that revenue growth is significantly outpacing the bank's fixed cost base.
The NIM expansion is the dominant story, suggesting either a rapid repricing of the loan book or a favorable shift in the asset mix toward higher-yielding securities, which now constitute 81% of total assets. The efficiency ratio improvement to 47.2% is positive but appears secondary to the NIM-driven revenue surge. Investors should monitor whether this NIM level is sustainable, as a reversal would quickly pressure both profitability and the efficiency ratio, given the bank's high fixed-cost structure.
Equity Growth Supports Expansion Capacity
The equity-to-assets ratio improved to 0.12 in 2026Q2 from 0.11 in the prior year, with total equity growing 18.3% year-over-year, suggesting a strengthening capital base that may support future growth or capital returns.
The improving equity-to-assets ratio indicates that the bank is retaining earnings and growing its capital base faster than its balance sheet, which is expanding at 13.9% year-over-year. This trend suggests management is prioritizing capital accumulation, potentially to support the significant growth in the investment securities portfolio or to maintain buffers against Peruvian regulatory requirements. The current capital position appears adequate for the bank's stated strategy, though the lack of explicit CET1 data in the provided ratios limits a precise assessment against regulatory minimums.
Provision Decline Signals Stabilization
Provision for loan losses decreased to $458.6 million in 2026Q2 from $551.9 million in 2024Q1, suggesting an improvement in the underlying credit quality of the retail loan book or a normalization from prior stress periods.
The declining trend in provisions is a positive signal for asset quality, indicating that the Peruvian consumer may be navigating the inflationary environment better than feared. However, the absolute level of provisioning remains substantial, reflecting the inherent risk in IFS's unsecured consumer and credit card exposure. The sustainability of this improvement is key; any reversal in the Peruvian macroeconomic outlook could quickly lead to a re-acceleration of credit costs, directly impacting the bank's strong net margin.
P/E Multiple Misleads on Earnings Quality
The reported P/E TTM of 11.58 is likely misleading due to significant volatility in non-interest income from insurance mark-to-market effects, making P/B a more reliable valuation metric for assessing the bank's core franchise value.
The extreme swings in non-interest income, from a loss of $430.4 million in 2025Q4 to a gain of $713.5 million in 2026Q2, create substantial noise in the earnings figure used for the P/E calculation. This volatility is driven by unrealized gains/losses in the Interseguro investment portfolio and IFRS 9 provisioning adjustments, not core banking operations. Consequently, the P/E multiple can fluctuate wildly based on non-cash accounting entries, obscuring the bank's underlying profitability. Investors should focus on P/B and ROTCE, which are less distorted by these insurance and accounting effects, to gauge the true valuation of the banking franchise.