Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 69.3x · EV/EBITDA 27.0x · ROE 1.5%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.8B | $3.1B | $3.2B | $5.1B | $4.8B | $9.3B | $12.0B | $7.8B | $6.2B | $11.7B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $2.4B | $2.7B | $2.6B | $4.6B | $4.2B | $8.6B | $11.2B | $7.2B | $5.7B | $10.9B | $4.7B |
| P/E Ratio → | 69.31 | 98.08 | — | 23.44 | 43.83 | 33.36 | 75.35 | 43.26 | 15.35 | 33.67 | 20.35 |
| P/S Ratio | 2.51 | 3.04 | 3.30 | 3.99 | 3.37 | 6.35 | 10.02 | 5.94 | 4.25 | 8.31 | 5.28 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.31 | 1.43 | 1.59 | 2.13 | 2.02 | 3.38 | 4.64 | 3.25 | 2.81 | 5.79 | 3.41 |
| P/FCF | 79.17 | — | 21.58 | 27.69 | 47.03 | 34.82 | 60.90 | 41.07 | 26.61 | 42.15 | 32.14 |
| P/OCF | 36.79 | 40.53 | 13.01 | 17.35 | 22.67 | 23.82 | 42.18 | 24.12 | 15.76 | 28.96 | 18.17 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.66 | 2.68 | 3.60 | 2.91 | 5.91 | 9.33 | 5.45 | 3.91 | 7.70 | 4.70 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.01 | 33.36 | — | 15.38 | 16.00 | 18.60 | 38.21 | 21.72 | 9.44 | 17.63 | 11.37 |
| EV / EBIT | 182.04 | 59.14 | 181.12 | 20.04 | 17.98 | 24.47 | 48.40 | 24.65 | 11.02 | 19.19 | 12.82 |
| EV / FCF | — | — | 17.55 | 25.01 | 40.59 | 32.38 | 56.69 | 37.74 | 24.47 | 39.05 | 28.61 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 38.0% | 38.0% | 34.6% | 42.1% | 38.9% | 47.7% | 44.9% | 46.1% | 54.8% | 56.6% | 54.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | 1.3% | -21.3% | 18.0% | 11.9% | 25.2% | 16.5% | 17.8% | 35.9% | 39.1% | 36.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 3.1% | 3.1% | -18.6% | 17.0% | 7.7% | 19.1% | 13.3% | 13.7% | 27.7% | 24.7% | 25.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 1.5% | 1.5% | -8.2% | 9.1% | 4.3% | 10.4% | 6.4% | 7.8% | 19.1% | 19.4% | 18.5% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | -7.3% | 8.0% | 3.7% | 9.1% | 5.6% | 6.8% | 16.3% | 16.7% | 16.1% |
| ROIC | 0.6% | 0.6% | -9.3% | 9.5% | 6.7% | 14.3% | 8.4% | 10.1% | 27.4% | 38.7% | 32.7% |
| ROCE | 0.6% | 0.6% | -9.1% | 9.4% | 6.4% | 13.2% | 7.6% | 9.6% | 23.3% | 29.0% | 24.8% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.22 | 0.22 | — | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.18 | -0.30 | -0.21 | -0.28 | -0.24 | -0.32 | -0.26 | -0.23 | -0.43 | -0.37 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -4.83 | -4.83 | — | -1.65 | -2.54 | -1.40 | -2.84 | -1.92 | -0.83 | -1.40 | -1.40 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | -4.03 | -2.68 | -6.44 | -2.44 | -4.21 | -3.33 | -2.14 | -3.10 | -3.53 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 282.83 |
Net cash position: cash ($404M) exceeds total debt ($17M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.08 | 6.08 | 6.98 | 8.91 | 7.23 | 7.49 | 10.01 | 9.88 | 7.35 | 8.82 | 8.22 |
| Quick Ratio | 4.74 | 4.74 | 5.59 | 6.80 | 5.38 | 6.02 | 8.31 | 7.90 | 5.70 | 7.27 | 6.71 |
| Cash Ratio | 3.59 | 3.59 | 4.54 | 5.48 | 4.29 | 4.83 | 6.48 | 6.16 | 4.25 | 5.61 | 5.25 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.99 | 1.99 | 2.24 | 1.64 | 1.72 | 1.66 | 1.81 | 1.86 | 1.63 | 1.99 | 1.90 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 66.08 | 63.92 | 62.10 | 53.96 | 65.49 | 80.35 | 66.21 | 63.88 | 61.47 | 56.55 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 1.4% | 1.0% | — | 4.3% | 2.3% | 3.0% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 6.5% | 3.0% | 4.9% |
| FCF Yield | 1.3% | — | 4.6% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 2.9% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 3.8% | 2.4% | 3.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.9% | 1.7% | 10.7% | 4.4% | 10.4% | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 2.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.9% | 1.7% | 10.7% | 4.4% | 10.4% | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 2.8% | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $43M | $44M | $47M | $51M | $54M | $54M | $54M | $55M | $55M | $54M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying IPGP stock.
IPG Photonics Corporation's current P/E ratio is 69.3x. The historical average is 42.0x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
IPG Photonics Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 27.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 16.7x.
IPG Photonics Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 1.5%. The historical average is 15.3%.
Based on historical data, IPG Photonics Corporation is trading at a P/E of 69.3x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
IPG Photonics Corporation has 38.0% gross margin and 1.3% operating margin.
IPG Photonics Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.2x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Earnings-driven valuation compression risk
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Premium Multiples Price Recovery Not Yet Proven
Based on reported figures, IPGP trades at 89.47x trailing earnings and 29.83x trailing EV/EBITDA, multiples that appear to embed a sustained earnings recovery well beyond the current 1.31% operating margin base.
The gap between trailing P/E of 89.47 and forward P/E of 59.17 implies the market expects earnings to roughly double on a forward basis, which suggests investors are pricing in a durable margin rebound rather than the cyclical bounce visible in recent quarters. Relative to the peer set, IPGP's trailing multiples sit well below Lumentum and Viavi but above MKS and NPK, which may indicate a hybrid valuation between a high-growth photonics name and an industrial hardware cyclical. Investors should monitor whether forward guidance of $0.30 to $0.60 EPS validates the implied earnings trajectory, as a failure to deliver would likely pressure the multiple given the thin current margin of safety.
Gross Margin Recovery Stalls Below Historical Range
As reported in financial statements, IPGP's gross margin climbed from a 23.2% trough in 2024Q3 to 40.7% in 2026Q3, yet remains roughly 10 to 15 points below the mid-50s levels historically associated with the business.
The recovery in gross margin is substantial but incomplete, suggesting that competitive price pressure from Chinese fiber laser producers may have reset the earning power baseline rather than merely compressing it temporarily. Operating margin of 7.2% in 2026Q3 versus negative readings earlier in 2026 indicates meaningful operating leverage, yet the spread between gross and operating margin remains wide, implying a heavy fixed overhead base. Net margin trails operating margin in several quarters, which warrants investigation into non-operating items rather than assuming the operating figure reflects distributable earnings.
Returns Remain Subdued Despite Margin Repair
Based on IPGP's reported figures, ROIC of 1.0% and ROE of 0.9% in 2026Q3 remain far below the 5-10 year compounding levels typically expected from a dominant laser franchise, despite a nominal recovery from negative readings.
Returns on capital are constrained by a large equity base of roughly $2.2B against modest quarterly earnings, so even meaningful margin improvement translates into low percentage returns. The negative ROIC reading in 2024Q3 and near-zero returns across most of the ten quarters suggest the company has struggled to earn its cost of capital consistently. Compounding requires sustained margin expansion toward historical levels; without it, the high cash balance will likely continue to dilute returns rather than enhance them.
Cash Fortress Masks Working Capital Volatility
According to reported quarterly figures, IPGP's current ratio of 5.99 and quick ratio of 4.68 in 2026Q3 indicate very high liquidity coverage, though the ratio has compressed from 9.02 in 2024Q2.
Liquidity is exceptionally strong with total debt of only $16.2M against a cash balance near $710.7M, implying negligible refinancing risk under any reasonable stress scenario. The compression in the current ratio over two years suggests either rising operating liabilities or deployment of cash into capital and acquisition activity. Investors should note that a large portion of the recent cash build may reflect favorable working capital timing, which could reverse and reduce the headline liquidity cushion.
Price-to-Earnings Misapplied to Cyclical Recovery
Based on the reported data, the trailing P/E of 89.47 is most commonly misapplied to IPGP, since depressed and volatile earnings make the ratio hypersensitive to the cycle and obscure underlying earning power.
Trailing P/E is distorted by quarters of negative or near-zero net income, so a single strong quarter can compress the ratio sharply while masking a fragile base. A more informative approach would be normalized EV/EBIT or EV/sales adjusted for a mid-cycle margin, which would better reflect the business's capacity to earn through the cycle. Analysts should also account for the substantial cash balance by using enterprise value rather than market capitalization when comparing against peers.