Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -114.5x · EV/EBITDA 16.9x · ROE -1.7%. (2006–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.9B | $7.9B | $4.1B | $3.2B | $2.9B | $4.9B | $3.7B | $3.6B | $2.3B | $3.5B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise Value | $7.6B | $9.6B | $4.1B | $3.4B | $3.8B | $5.5B | $4.1B | $4.3B | $2.7B | $3.9B | $3.0B |
| P/E Ratio → | -114.49 | — | 47.96 | 5.49 | 22.44 | 41.62 | 33.59 | 28.02 | 22.23 | 43.79 | 37.86 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.55 | 2.07 | 2.38 | 1.92 | 1.84 | 3.52 | 2.12 | 1.85 | 1.20 | 2.16 | 1.90 |
| P/B Ratio | 1.33 | 1.77 | 2.65 | 2.14 | 3.24 | 6.57 | 5.74 | 6.33 | 5.06 | 8.00 | 14.24 |
| P/FCF | 24.79 | 33.10 | 20.91 | — | 50.81 | 28.64 | 16.79 | 49.86 | 20.27 | 52.99 | 84.53 |
| P/OCF | 17.27 | 23.06 | 17.52 | 80.61 | 20.60 | 22.03 | 14.50 | 32.71 | 15.02 | 33.79 | 38.00 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.52 | 2.40 | 2.02 | 2.41 | 3.94 | 2.39 | 2.19 | 1.38 | 2.38 | 2.24 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.94 | 21.35 | 19.81 | 13.11 | 18.38 | 27.95 | 17.59 | 16.80 | 13.19 | 19.87 | 21.70 |
| EV / EBIT | 40.11 | 225.30 | 35.86 | 18.91 | 28.16 | 42.27 | 25.93 | 22.97 | 18.59 | 26.64 | 29.27 |
| EV / FCF | — | 40.22 | 21.03 | — | 66.51 | 32.10 | 18.98 | 58.99 | 23.29 | 58.23 | 99.89 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 35.1% | 35.1% | 36.5% | 35.2% | 33.3% | 34.4% | 30.9% | 30.7% | 28.0% | 28.8% | 28.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 5.0% | 6.9% | 9.9% | 8.3% | 9.0% | 9.4% | 9.7% | 7.5% | 8.8% | 7.5% |
| Net Profit Margin | -1.3% | -1.3% | 5.0% | 35.0% | 8.6% | 8.5% | 6.3% | 6.6% | 5.4% | 4.9% | 5.0% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -1.7% | -1.7% | 5.6% | 48.7% | 16.6% | 17.2% | 18.0% | 25.1% | 23.2% | 25.9% | 43.7% |
| ROA | -0.9% | -0.9% | 2.8% | 21.8% | 5.7% | 6.0% | 5.8% | 7.7% | 7.3% | 6.2% | 6.6% |
| ROIC | 3.7% | 3.7% | 5.5% | 7.1% | 6.3% | 7.7% | 10.4% | 13.9% | 13.5% | 15.0% | 14.8% |
| ROCE | 4.0% | 4.0% | 4.6% | 7.8% | 7.3% | 8.5% | 11.7% | 15.7% | 15.1% | 16.5% | 15.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.43 | 1.08 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 1.23 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 2.77 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 4.20 | 4.20 | 6.03 | 2.52 | 4.68 | 3.41 | 2.23 | 2.75 | 1.92 | 1.96 | 3.57 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 1.16 | 0.75 | 0.79 | 2.59 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 3.78 | 3.78 | 0.11 | 0.64 | 4.34 | 3.01 | 2.03 | 2.60 | 1.71 | 1.79 | 3.34 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 7.12 | 0.12 | — | 15.71 | 3.46 | 2.19 | 9.12 | 3.02 | 5.24 | 15.36 |
| Interest Coverage | 0.40 | 0.40 | 5.92 | 7.30 | 8.36 | 11.67 | 11.47 | 9.88 | 10.28 | 10.72 | 11.00 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.98 | 0.98 | 3.48 | 2.27 | 1.48 | 1.31 | 1.35 | 1.49 | 1.27 | 1.33 | 1.23 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.58 | 0.58 | 3.04 | 1.78 | 1.06 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.88 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.11 | 0.11 | 2.29 | 1.00 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.61 | 0.60 | 0.65 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 1.33 | 1.18 | 1.14 |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.83 | 3.83 | 4.67 | 4.52 | 4.02 | 4.01 | 6.05 | 5.50 | 6.71 | 6.12 | 6.95 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 53.95 | 71.28 | 63.36 | 60.96 | 86.90 | 64.30 | 68.15 | 61.55 | 70.63 | 70.41 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | 15.3% | 2.2% | 9.5% | 10.7% | 11.8% | 9.8% | 12.6% | 15.8% | 17.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | 2.1% | 18.2% | 4.5% | 2.4% | 3.0% | 3.6% | 4.5% | 2.3% | 2.6% |
| FCF Yield | 4.0% | 3.0% | 4.8% | — | 2.0% | 3.5% | 6.0% | 2.0% | 4.9% | 1.9% | 1.2% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $52M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $32M | $30M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 20 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying JBTM stock.
JBT Marel Corporation's current P/E ratio is -114.5x. The historical average is 25.5x.
JBT Marel Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 16.9x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 14.7x.
JBT Marel Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is -1.7%. The historical average is 32.0%.
Based on historical data, JBT Marel Corporation is trading at a P/E of -114.5x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
JBT Marel Corporation's current dividend yield is 0.35%.
JBT Marel Corporation has 35.1% gross margin and 5.0% operating margin.
JBT Marel Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 4.2x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Integration costs and margin dilution
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression from Integration Overhang
Gross margin held at 36.6% in Q2 2026, but operating margin fell to 4.7% from 7.3% in Q1, per reported data, indicating integration costs are pressuring profitability despite stable pricing.
The stability of gross margin around 35-36% suggests the combined entity retains pricing power in its core equipment and aftermarket businesses. However, the sequential drop in operating margin from 7.3% to 4.7% in Q2 2026, as per the latest quarterly data, points to SG&A and integration expenses outpacing revenue growth. Net margin recovered to 2.9% from a deeply negative Q1, but remains well below pre-merger levels, implying that the earnings power of the merged company is not yet visible in GAAP figures. Investors should monitor adjusted operating margins excluding amortization and restructuring charges to gauge the underlying profitability trajectory.
Return on Capital Depressed by Merger Accounting
ROIC improved to 0.6% in Q2 2026 from -0.7% in Q1, but remains far below the 2.1% seen in Q3 2024, per reported figures, reflecting the dilutive impact of the Marel acquisition on capital efficiency.
The sharp decline in ROIC from pre-merger levels is largely attributable to the massive increase in invested capital from the Marel acquisition, which has not yet generated proportional operating income. The negative ROE of -1.7% in Q1 2026 and the current 0.6% ROE indicate that the company is not yet earning its cost of capital. As integration synergies materialize and amortization charges subside, ROIC should improve, but the pace will depend on the company's ability to grow operating income faster than the acquired asset base. The goodwill-heavy balance sheet, with goodwill at 42.5% of total assets, raises the risk of future impairments that could further depress returns.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens Post-Merger
Cash conversion cycle extended to 111 days in Q2 2026 from 103 days in Q4 2025, per reported data, driven by higher DIO of 100 days, indicating integration-related inventory buildup and slower cash conversion.
The increase in days inventory outstanding to 100 days in Q2 2026, up from 92 days in Q4 2025, suggests that the merged entity is carrying more inventory, possibly due to supply chain disruptions or integration of product lines. DSO remained relatively stable around 54 days, while DPO improved slightly to 43 days, but the net effect is a lengthening CCC. This ties up cash and may pressure liquidity, especially given the current ratio of 1.24. Management's focus on working capital efficiency will be critical to free up cash for debt reduction and to support the elevated leverage.
Leverage Elevated but Deleveraging Underway
Debt-to-equity improved to 0.38 in Q2 2026 from a peak of 0.81 in Q4 2024, per reported data, but D/EBITDA remains high at 14.99, indicating significant debt relative to current earnings.
The deleveraging trend is encouraging, with D/E falling from 0.81 to 0.38 over the past six quarters, reflecting equity issuance and debt repayment. However, D/EBITDA of 14.99 in Q2 2026 is extremely elevated, though this is distorted by depressed EBITDA due to integration costs. Interest coverage of 3.69x in Q2 2026, while improved from negative levels in Q1, remains thin. As EBITDA normalizes post-integration, D/EBITDA should decline, but the company's ability to service debt comfortably depends on achieving projected synergies. Investors should monitor free cash flow generation and any covenant restrictions.
Liquidity Squeeze Post-Acquisition
Current ratio fell to 1.24 in Q2 2026 from 3.48 in Q4 2024, per reported data, while cash dropped to $112M, indicating a significant liquidity strain following the Marel acquisition.
The sharp decline in the current ratio and cash reserves reflects the cash outlay for the Marel acquisition and the integration-related working capital needs. The quick ratio of 0.70 in Q2 2026 suggests that the company relies on inventory to meet short-term obligations, which could be problematic if inventory becomes obsolete or difficult to sell. While the company has access to credit facilities, the tight liquidity position warrants close monitoring, especially if cash conversion continues to lengthen. A sustained improvement in operating cash flow is essential to rebuild liquidity buffers.
Misapplied EV/EBITDA in Merger Context
EV/EBITDA of 17.35 appears expensive, but EBITDA is depressed by one-time integration costs and non-cash amortization, per reported data, making the multiple misleading for valuation.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for JBTM is EV/EBITDA, because the current EBITDA does not reflect the normalized earnings power of the combined entity. The negative net margin and high D/EBITDA are artifacts of acquisition accounting and integration expenses. Analysts should use forward EV/EBITDA based on projected synergies and adjusted EBITDA, or EV/EBITDAR, to better capture the underlying performance. Additionally, given the significant goodwill on the balance sheet, price-to-book is also distorted. A more appropriate valuation metric would be EV/forward EBITDA or EV/adjusted operating income, which strips out non-recurring charges and provides a clearer picture of the company's value creation potential.