Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 32.7x · EV/EBITDA 12.0x · ROE 8.6%. (1996–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $4.8B | $5.7B | $7.4B | $5.1B | $4.6B | $7.7B | $4.2B | $3.6B | $3.2B | $3.8B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise Value | $4.9B | $5.8B | $7.4B | $5.3B | $4.6B | $7.7B | $4.0B | $3.9B | $2.7B | $3.3B | $2.5B |
| P/E Ratio → | 32.70 | 38.83 | 17.58 | 28.68 | 4.97 | 5.58 | 8.33 | — | 8.14 | 9.87 | 18.38 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.75 | 2.09 | 2.50 | 1.98 | 1.20 | 1.96 | 1.74 | 1.58 | 1.13 | 1.40 | 1.23 |
| P/B Ratio | 2.75 | 3.27 | 4.40 | 3.28 | 3.22 | 6.20 | 3.35 | 3.65 | 1.89 | 2.39 | 2.30 |
| P/FCF | 52.22 | 62.12 | 17.42 | 318.74 | 6.33 | 6.24 | 7.15 | — | 10.83 | 11.79 | 12.65 |
| P/OCF | 12.44 | 14.80 | 12.15 | 16.14 | 4.04 | 5.17 | 6.32 | 22.95 | 6.29 | 8.09 | 8.04 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.13 | 2.51 | 2.04 | 1.20 | 1.97 | 1.67 | 1.67 | 0.95 | 1.20 | 1.11 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.03 | 14.26 | 11.29 | 12.95 | 3.37 | 4.18 | 5.56 | 37.48 | 4.15 | 5.07 | 7.79 |
| EV / EBIT | 18.77 | 27.57 | 13.84 | 20.14 | 3.78 | 4.43 | 6.22 | — | 4.98 | 6.20 | 12.60 |
| EV / FCF | — | 63.32 | 17.52 | 328.49 | 6.36 | 6.27 | 6.90 | — | 9.05 | 10.09 | 11.35 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 21.8% | 28.3% | 23.0% | 38.9% | 50.1% | 34.7% | 13.1% | 26.3% | 31.2% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | 9.6% | 9.6% | 18.0% | 11.1% | 32.4% | 44.3% | 25.6% | -0.9% | 18.6% | 19.1% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.4% | 5.4% | 14.3% | 6.9% | 28.2% | 35.2% | 20.8% | -0.2% | 14.0% | 14.3% | 6.7% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.6% | 8.6% | 26.0% | 11.9% | 81.3% | 110.9% | 44.5% | -0.4% | 23.9% | 27.8% | 13.5% |
| ROA | 5.6% | 5.6% | 16.8% | 7.4% | 47.8% | 64.3% | 25.5% | -0.2% | 15.9% | 17.4% | 7.1% |
| ROIC | 10.9% | 10.9% | 23.2% | 13.6% | 68.5% | 109.5% | 39.9% | -1.3% | 35.4% | 39.9% | 13.6% |
| ROCE | 11.3% | 11.3% | 24.0% | 13.8% | 65.1% | 95.7% | 36.8% | -1.1% | 24.0% | 26.3% | 10.6% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.32 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.58 | 0.93 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.54 | 3.81 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 1.19 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.03 | -0.12 | 0.21 | -0.31 | -0.34 | -0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.02 | -0.20 | 2.05 | -0.81 | -0.85 | -0.89 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 1.20 | 0.09 | 9.75 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.25 | — | -1.78 | -1.70 | -1.30 |
| Interest Coverage | 14.93 | 14.93 | 38.14 | 18.64 | 111.82 | 124.50 | 34.00 | -0.35 | 34.11 | 27.44 | 6.10 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.78 | 2.78 | 2.74 | 2.84 | 2.49 | 2.47 | 3.37 | 2.20 | 4.26 | 5.03 | 4.44 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.54 | 1.54 | 1.59 | 1.46 | 1.51 | 1.70 | 2.49 | 1.26 | 3.36 | 4.07 | 3.42 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.09 | 0.81 | 1.08 | 0.99 | 1.81 | 0.64 | 2.91 | 3.44 | 2.88 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.03 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 1.64 | 1.78 | 1.15 | 1.26 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.10 |
| Inventory Turnover | 5.84 | 5.84 | 5.89 | 5.26 | 7.01 | 7.05 | 6.05 | 7.57 | 7.63 | 7.26 | 7.35 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 17.12 | 16.38 | 21.92 | 12.12 | 15.76 | 28.00 | 25.91 | 16.47 | 19.02 | 17.70 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.6% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 0.9% | 1.6% | 1.8% | 2.3% | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 53.4% | 53.4% | 17.6% | 38.8% | 6.4% | 4.8% | 13.0% | — | 18.9% | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.1% | 2.6% | 5.7% | 3.5% | 20.1% | 17.9% | 12.0% | — | 12.3% | 10.1% | 5.4% |
| FCF Yield | 1.9% | 1.6% | 5.7% | 0.3% | 15.8% | 16.0% | 14.0% | — | 9.2% | 8.5% | 7.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.3% | 1.1% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 19.5% | 16.9% | 4.8% | 17.5% | 6.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 2.9% | 2.5% | 3.9% | 1.4% | 21.0% | 17.8% | 6.4% | 19.3% | 8.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $70M | $71M | $72M | $78M | $98M | $112M | $123M | $144M | $146M | $145M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 30 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LPX stock.
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation's current P/E ratio is 32.7x. The historical average is 18.6x. This places it at the 88th percentile of its historical range.
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation's current EV/EBITDA is 12.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 13.3x.
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation's return on equity (ROE) is 8.6%. The historical average is 11.1%.
Based on historical data, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation is trading at a P/E of 32.7x. This is at the 88th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation's current dividend yield is 1.64% with a payout ratio of 53.4%.
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation has 21.8% gross margin and 9.6% operating margin.
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 1.0x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
OSB price and demand cyclicality
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Compression Accelerates
Gross margin fell to 17.5% in 2026Q2 from 23.6% a year earlier, according to recent financial statements, reflecting OSB price weakness and input cost pressure. Operating margin dropped to 4.7%, down from 10.6% in 2025Q2.
The sequential deterioration in gross margin from 20.0% in 2026Q1 to 17.5% in 2026Q2 suggests that input costs, particularly resins and wood fiber, are not falling in line with selling prices. This margin compression is consistent with the prior income statement analysis showing COGS as a percentage of revenue rising to 82.5%. The operating margin of 4.7% is well below the 10.6% reported in the year-ago quarter, indicating that the high-fixed-cost model is experiencing negative operating leverage as volumes decline. Investors should monitor whether the Siding segment's higher-margin mix can offset further OSB price declines, as the current margin trajectory appears to be approaching cyclical trough levels.
Returns Decay from Cyclical Peak
ROIC has fallen from 8.4% in 2024Q2 to 1.2% in 2026Q2, as reported in quarterly data, reflecting the sharp downturn in OSB pricing. ROE similarly contracted from 9.8% to 1.5% over the same period.
The collapse in ROIC from 8.4% to 1.2% over eight quarters indicates that the company is no longer earning its cost of capital, a stark reversal from the cyclical peak. This decline is driven primarily by margin compression rather than asset efficiency, as asset turnover has only modestly decreased from 0.32 to 0.26. The increase in net PPE to $1.8 billion, as noted in the balance sheet analysis, suggests that capital expenditures for Siding capacity expansion have continued despite falling returns, which may pressure future ROIC if demand does not recover. The current ROIC of 1.2% is below the company's historical average and implies that the market's forward EV/EBITDA of 7.91 is pricing in a significant recovery in profitability, which appears optimistic given the current trajectory.
Working Capital Efficiency Deteriorates
Cash conversion cycle lengthened to 68 days in 2026Q2 from 41 days in 2024Q2, according to financial statements, driven by slower inventory turnover and extended payment terms. DSO rose to 23 days from 19 days.
The CCC expansion from 41 to 68 days over eight quarters indicates that LPX is holding inventory longer and collecting receivables more slowly, which is typical in a demand downturn but also ties up cash. DIO increased from 64 to 66 days, while DPO fell from 41 to 20 days, suggesting that LPX is paying suppliers faster, possibly to secure supply or due to reduced negotiating leverage. This working capital deterioration is consistent with the cash flow statement's observation of significant swings in working capital, which have amplified cash flow volatility. The lengthening CCC, combined with falling revenue, suggests that cash conversion will remain under pressure unless management tightens inventory management or extends payables, which may be difficult in a weak demand environment.
Fortress Balance Sheet Provides Cushion
Debt-to-equity remains negligible at 0.22, with interest coverage of 7.5x in 2026Q2, as per recent filings, indicating ample capacity to service debt. D/EBITDA rose to 5.39 from 1.64 in 2024Q2 due to falling EBITDA.
Despite the sharp decline in EBITDA, LPX's leverage metrics remain conservative, with D/E at 0.22 and interest coverage at 7.5x, which is still comfortable. However, D/EBITDA has risen from 1.64 to 5.39 over eight quarters, reflecting the cyclical earnings downturn rather than increased borrowing. The fortress-like balance sheet, with $228 million in cash and minimal debt, provides significant strategic flexibility to weather a prolonged downturn or fund opportunistic capacity expansion. Investors should note that if EBITDA continues to decline, D/EBITDA could rise further, but the absolute debt level of $377 million is manageable against equity of $1.7 billion. This low leverage is a key differentiator versus peers like BlueLinx, which has a D/E of 1.09, and supports the company's ability to maintain dividends and invest through the cycle.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens
Current ratio improved to 3.22 in 2026Q2 from 2.74 a year earlier, according to balance sheet data, with quick ratio at 1.67. Cash of $228 million provides ample coverage for short-term obligations.
The current ratio of 3.22 indicates that LPX has more than three times current assets to cover current liabilities, a strong liquidity position that has actually improved during the downturn. The quick ratio of 1.67, which excludes inventory, still shows robust coverage, suggesting that even if inventory becomes difficult to liquidate, the company can meet near-term obligations. This liquidity buffer is consistent with the fortress balance sheet signal and provides a cushion against further demand weakness. However, the negative free cash flow margin in 2026Q1 (-17.1%) highlights that cash generation can be volatile, and the company may need to rely on its cash reserves if the downturn persists. The strong liquidity position also supports the company's ability to maintain its dividend, which currently yields 1.5%.
Misapplied P/E Distorts Cyclicality
The trailing P/E of 35.5 and forward P/E of 56.5, based on current data, are misleading for a cyclical company at trough earnings. EV/EBITDA of 13.05 is a more appropriate metric, but still elevated versus peers.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for LPX is the P/E multiple, which is distorted by the cyclical trough in earnings. With net income down sharply, the trailing P/E of 35.5 and forward P/E of 56.5 appear expensive, but this is a function of depressed earnings, not necessarily overvaluation. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 13.05 is still above the peer average but reflects the market's expectation of a recovery in EBITDA. However, even EV/EBITDA can be misleading if OSB prices remain weak, as the forward EV/EBITDA of 7.91 implies a significant rebound. Investors should instead focus on price-to-book (P/B of 2.99) or EV/Sales (1.91) to gauge valuation relative to the asset base and revenue, which are less distorted by cyclical earnings swings. The market's classification of LPX as a commodity producer may also understate the value of its Siding segment, which has more stable demand and higher margins, suggesting that a sum-of-the-parts analysis could be more insightful than a single multiple.