Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 43.1x · EV/EBITDA 22.0x · ROE 14.6%. (2004–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.4B | $889M | $721M | $565M | $548M | $757M | $251M | $245M | $204M | $185M | $344M |
| Enterprise Value | $1.2B | $729M | $582M | $466M | $467M | $665M | $186M | $208M | $145M | $91M | $210M |
| P/E Ratio → | 43.11 | 31.53 | 36.19 | 27.11 | 13.55 | 14.90 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 2.78 | 1.87 | 1.99 | 1.80 | 1.96 | 2.94 | 1.22 | 1.08 | 0.91 | 0.69 | 1.09 |
| P/B Ratio | 6.96 | 4.37 | 3.95 | 3.50 | 3.55 | 5.61 | 2.24 | 2.11 | 1.57 | 1.40 | 2.12 |
| P/FCF | 15.12 | 15.08 | 11.76 | 13.58 | 14.93 | 12.62 | 20.50 | — | — | — | 8.15 |
| P/OCF | 20.38 | 13.32 | 10.27 | 12.02 | 12.23 | 11.57 | 15.22 | — | 329.25 | — | 7.12 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 1.53 | 1.60 | 1.48 | 1.67 | 2.58 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.65 | 0.34 | 0.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.96 | 16.02 | 16.40 | 12.47 | 8.08 | 19.48 | 77.85 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 34.23 | 18.47 | 21.37 | 17.84 | 20.38 | 24.12 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 12.36 | 9.50 | 11.19 | 12.71 | 11.09 | 15.23 | — | — | — | 4.97 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 43.8% | 51.0% | 54.7% | 57.4% | 58.2% | 53.4% | 54.8% | 55.4% | 53.3% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 7.4% | 6.4% | 8.3% | 16.9% | 10.5% | -1.9% | -8.6% | -9.7% | -14.9% | -10.8% |
| Net Profit Margin | 5.9% | 5.9% | 5.5% | 6.7% | 14.4% | 19.8% | -1.8% | -8.5% | -5.2% | -14.5% | -18.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 14.6% | 14.6% | 11.6% | 13.3% | 27.9% | 41.3% | -3.3% | -15.7% | -8.9% | -26.5% | -31.7% |
| ROA | 7.8% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 6.8% | 14.3% | 22.5% | -2.0% | -9.9% | -5.6% | -16.5% | -21.8% |
| ROIC | 60.8% | 60.8% | 33.1% | 29.0% | 61.2% | 45.0% | -4.6% | -19.4% | -29.8% | -90.9% | -34.4% |
| ROCE | 17.3% | 17.3% | 12.4% | 14.2% | 28.8% | 20.2% | -3.2% | -15.5% | -15.6% | -25.2% | -17.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.10 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.41 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.43 | 4.84 | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.79 | -0.76 | -0.62 | -0.53 | -0.68 | -0.58 | -0.31 | -0.45 | -0.71 | -0.83 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -3.53 | -3.53 | -3.91 | -2.66 | -1.41 | -2.69 | -26.93 | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -2.72 | -2.26 | -2.39 | -2.22 | -1.53 | -5.27 | — | — | — | -3.18 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -12.39 |
Net cash position: cash ($175M) exceeds total debt ($14M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.27 | 1.19 | 1.03 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.31 | 1.50 | 1.96 | 2.16 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.16 | 1.10 | 0.94 | 1.08 | 1.20 | 1.22 | 1.36 | 1.67 | 1.84 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.79 | 0.97 | 1.02 | 0.97 | 1.15 | 1.33 | 1.57 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 1.27 | 1.05 | 1.03 | 0.91 | 1.01 | 1.05 | 1.21 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 1.22 |
| Inventory Turnover | 18.89 | 18.89 | 10.42 | 12.80 | 10.22 | 8.64 | 17.12 | 17.53 | 9.89 | 6.09 | 5.18 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 9.55 | 13.03 | 10.15 | 16.54 | 9.16 | 12.98 | 15.80 | 7.92 | 20.22 | 13.33 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 2.3% | 3.2% | 2.8% | 3.7% | 7.4% | 6.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 6.6% | 6.6% | 8.5% | 7.4% | 6.7% | 7.9% | 4.9% | — | — | — | 12.3% |
| Buyback Yield | 1.2% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.2% | 1.8% | 1.3% | 3.8% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $32M | $32M | $32M | $34M | $35M | $34M | $33M | $32M | $31M | $31M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 22 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LQDT stock.
Liquidity Services, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 43.1x. The historical average is 35.7x. This places it at the 79th percentile of its historical range.
Liquidity Services, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 22.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 18.7x.
Liquidity Services, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 14.6%. The historical average is 8.1%.
Based on historical data, Liquidity Services, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 43.1x. This is at the 79th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Liquidity Services, Inc. has 43.8% gross margin and 7.4% operating margin.
Liquidity Services, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.3x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
SG&A inflation and margin pressure
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Gross Margin Expansion Masks Operating Intensity
Gross margin improved to 49.3% in 2026Q3 from 45.7% a year earlier, yet operating margin of 10.9% remains thin, indicating high SG&A costs that may temper bottom-line gains.
The 350 basis point gross margin expansion suggests a favorable shift toward consignment-based revenue, which carries higher incremental margins. However, operating margin of 10.9% is still well below peers like Copart (36.5%) and eBay (20.5%), reflecting the operational intensity of handling physical goods and maintaining a two-sided marketplace. Net margin of 8.0% is further compressed by stock-based compensation, which exceeded half of operating income in the quarter, implying that reported earnings may overstate cash profitability.
ROIC Volatility Signals Mix Sensitivity
ROIC swung from 6.9% in 2025Q2 to 29.9% in 2026Q3, per company filings, reflecting the lumpy nature of large liquidation contracts and the impact of working capital swings on invested capital.
The dramatic quarterly swings in ROIC—from 6.9% to 29.9%—are not indicative of a stable compounding business but rather highlight the sensitivity of returns to the timing of large transactions and the mix between purchase and consignment models. The elevated ROIC in 2026Q3 likely benefits from a low capital base, as the company holds minimal debt and significant cash, which reduces invested capital. Investors should focus on the trend in gross profit per dollar of invested capital rather than quarterly ROIC, as the latter is distorted by working capital volatility.
Negative CCC Reflects Platform Leverage
Cash conversion cycle improved to -44 days in 2026Q3, driven by DPO of 79 days and DSO of 10 days, indicating LQDT collects from buyers before paying sellers, a sign of strong marketplace positioning.
The negative cash conversion cycle, which has been consistently negative over the past ten quarters, demonstrates that LQDT is effectively using its platform to finance operations with suppliers' money. DSO of 10 days is exceptionally low, reflecting the auction model where buyers pay quickly, while DPO of 79 days suggests the company holds cash from sales before remitting to sellers. This working capital efficiency is a key competitive advantage, as it reduces the need for external financing and supports the asset-light model. However, the improvement from -53 days in 2024Q2 to -44 days in 2026Q3 may indicate a slight shift in payment terms, which warrants monitoring.
Minimal Debt Provides Strategic Flexibility
Debt-to-equity stands at 0.06 with D/EBITDA of 0.81, per the latest quarter, indicating a nearly debt-free balance sheet that offers ample capacity for acquisitions or organic investments.
With total debt of only $13.6 million against $174.6 million in cash, LQDT's leverage is negligible, and interest coverage is effectively infinite. This fortress-like balance sheet provides significant financial flexibility, allowing the company to pursue strategic acquisitions like Machinio without dilutive financing. However, the conservative capital structure also suggests that management may be holding excess cash that could be returned to shareholders, especially given the lack of dividends or buybacks. The low leverage is a positive signal in a cyclical industry, as it cushions against downturns, but investors should monitor whether the cash hoard is deployed efficiently.
Liquidity Buffer Strengthens Amidst Volatility
Current ratio improved to 1.58 in 2026Q3 from 1.12 in 2024Q2, with quick ratio at 1.49, indicating a robust liquidity position that can absorb working capital swings and operational shocks.
The steady improvement in the current ratio from 1.12 to 1.58 over the past ten quarters reflects a deliberate build-up of cash and short-term assets, likely to support growth initiatives and cushion against the lumpy cash flows inherent in the liquidation business. The quick ratio of 1.49, which excludes inventory, is particularly strong, suggesting that the company does not rely on inventory liquidation to meet short-term obligations. This liquidity buffer is critical given the volatility in free cash flow, which swung from -$11.4 million in 2025Q1 to +$30.5 million in 2025Q4. The fortress liquidity position provides a clear advantage in a cyclical industry, but it also raises questions about capital allocation efficiency.
P/E Misleads on Platform Earnings Power
The trailing P/E of 49.97 appears expensive, but it understates the earnings power of the consignment model, where incremental GMV flows to the bottom line with high marginal margins.
The most commonly misapplied ratio for LQDT is the P/E multiple, which is distorted by the mix of purchase versus consignment revenue. In purchase transactions, revenue is recorded gross, inflating the top line and compressing net margins, while consignment revenue is recorded net, leading to higher margins but lower reported revenue. As a result, the trailing P/E of 49.97 may overstate the cost of the stock relative to its true cash-generating ability. Analysts should instead focus on EV/EBITDA (26.28) or price-to-FCF (22.99), which better capture the platform's economics. Additionally, the forward P/E of 28.88 suggests the market expects significant earnings growth, which may be achievable if the company continues to shift toward consignment and scales its marketplace.