Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.7x · EV/EBITDA 8.1x · ROE 63.9%. (2000–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.4B | $45.1B | $37.9B | $37.6B | $36.7B | $28.8B | $45.5B | $53.2B | $40.9B | $55.0B | $42.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $37.7B | $57.4B | $48.0B | $46.6B | $46.4B | $41.7B | $57.5B | $61.5B | $48.2B | $62.3B | $49.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.68 | 27.70 | 26.20 | 30.76 | 20.03 | — | — | 19.73 | 16.95 | 19.63 | 25.43 |
| P/S Ratio | 1.95 | 3.47 | 3.35 | 3.63 | 8.94 | 6.79 | 15.49 | 4.39 | 2.98 | 4.32 | 3.77 |
| P/B Ratio | 14.04 | 23.32 | 11.98 | 9.17 | 10.05 | 12.79 | 12.87 | 8.18 | 6.07 | 7.22 | 5.67 |
| P/FCF | 14.26 | 25.34 | 23.31 | 19.11 | — | — | — | 27.06 | 10.90 | 14.85 | 16.34 |
| P/OCF | 8.40 | 14.92 | 11.81 | 11.67 | — | 1917.13 | — | 17.52 | 8.70 | 12.11 | 10.50 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.41 | 4.24 | 4.49 | 11.29 | 9.85 | 19.54 | 5.07 | 3.51 | 4.89 | 4.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.14 | 12.40 | 12.51 | 12.86 | 144.52 | 102.20 | — | 13.86 | 9.85 | 13.33 | 13.68 |
| EV / EBIT | 12.20 | 19.40 | 17.85 | 17.96 | — | — | — | 15.19 | 12.79 | 18.41 | 19.68 |
| EV / FCF | — | 32.25 | 29.53 | 23.64 | — | — | — | 31.26 | 12.86 | 16.80 | 19.21 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 49.8% | 48.9% | 49.8% | 40.1% | 38.0% | 27.9% | 49.7% | 49.2% | 50.3% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | 23.7% | 21.8% | 22.7% | -18.7% | -16.3% | -47.4% | 27.7% | 27.3% | 27.2% | 22.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 12.5% | 12.5% | 12.8% | 11.8% | 44.6% | -22.7% | -57.3% | 22.2% | 17.6% | 22.1% | 14.9% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 63.9% | 63.9% | 39.8% | 31.5% | 62.1% | -33.2% | -33.5% | 40.7% | 33.6% | 37.1% | 21.1% |
| ROA | 7.6% | 7.6% | 6.8% | 5.6% | 8.7% | -4.7% | -7.7% | 11.8% | 11.2% | 13.6% | 8.1% |
| ROIC | 16.9% | 16.9% | 14.1% | 13.4% | -4.1% | -3.4% | -6.9% | 17.5% | 19.4% | 17.4% | 12.3% |
| ROCE | 19.0% | 19.0% | 15.3% | 13.3% | -4.3% | -3.9% | -7.3% | 17.1% | 20.2% | 19.6% | 13.9% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 8.34 | 8.34 | 4.35 | 3.42 | 4.37 | 6.58 | 3.96 | 1.92 | 1.78 | 1.26 | 1.28 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 3.49 | 3.49 | 3.59 | 3.87 | 49.78 | 36.26 | — | 2.82 | 2.45 | 2.06 | 2.63 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 6.36 | 3.20 | 2.17 | 2.64 | 5.76 | 3.37 | 1.27 | 1.09 | 0.95 | 1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.66 | 2.66 | 2.63 | 2.46 | 30.12 | 31.72 | — | 1.86 | 1.50 | 1.55 | 2.05 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 6.91 | 6.22 | 4.53 | — | — | — | 4.20 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 2.87 |
| Interest Coverage | 3.97 | 3.97 | 3.70 | 3.17 | -0.98 | -1.37 | -2.59 | 9.02 | 8.46 | 10.34 | 9.26 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.74 | 1.31 | 1.73 | 2.15 | 2.03 | 1.65 | 1.76 | 1.08 | 1.10 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.73 | 1.30 | 1.72 | 2.14 | 2.02 | 1.63 | 1.75 | 1.07 | 1.09 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.63 | 1.15 | 1.62 | 0.72 | 0.74 | 1.31 | 1.47 | 0.82 | 0.76 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.48 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.52 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.55 |
| Inventory Turnover | 142.09 | 142.09 | 140.90 | 136.97 | 87.86 | 119.36 | 96.32 | 164.84 | 199.26 | 171.05 | 123.61 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 20.81 | 13.47 | 17.03 | 19.72 | 17.41 | 31.29 | 25.40 | 19.30 | 17.64 | 25.13 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.1% | 1.8% | 1.6% | 0.8% | — | — | 1.3% | 4.4% | 5.7% | 4.2% | 6.9% |
| Payout Ratio | 51.2% | 51.2% | 40.8% | 25.0% | — | — | — | 87.7% | 97.5% | 82.3% | 174.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.0% | 3.6% | 3.8% | 3.3% | 5.0% | — | — | 5.1% | 5.9% | 5.1% | 3.9% |
| FCF Yield | 7.0% | 3.9% | 4.3% | 5.2% | — | — | — | 3.7% | 9.2% | 6.7% | 6.1% |
| Buyback Yield | 8.7% | 4.9% | 4.6% | 1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.4% | 2.2% | 0.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 11.8% | 6.8% | 6.2% | 2.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 1.3% | 5.9% | 8.0% | 4.9% | 6.9% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $693M | $737M | $765M | $764M | $764M | $764M | $771M | $786M | $792M | $795M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 26 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying LVS stock.
Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s current P/E ratio is 16.7x. The historical average is 32.0x. This places it at the 6th percentile of its historical range.
Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s current EV/EBITDA is 8.1x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 20.6x.
Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s return on equity (ROE) is 63.9%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is 21.2%.
Based on historical data, Las Vegas Sands Corp. is trading at a P/E of 16.7x. This is at the 6th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s current dividend yield is 3.07% with a payout ratio of 51.2%.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. has 49.8% gross margin and 23.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Las Vegas Sands Corp.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 3.5x, indicating high leverage. A ratio between 2-4x is manageable but warrants monitoring.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Leverage and margin compression
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Mix Shift Masks Underlying Pressure
Gross margin jumped to 57.2% in Q2 2026 from 48.8% in Q1, per reported figures, yet operating margin fell to 19.6%, suggesting promotional allowances and cost pressures are eroding core profitability.
The 840 basis point gross margin expansion likely reflects a favorable shift toward mass-market play and lower comps, but the sequential decline in operating margin from 25.6% to 19.6% indicates that fixed costs are not being absorbed efficiently at current revenue levels. Net margin of 11.8% remains below the 15.8% seen in Q1, and the 29% EPS miss underscores that margin volatility is a key risk. Investors should monitor whether the gross margin improvement is sustainable or a one-off due to hold variance.
ROIC Stalls Despite Equity Leverage
ROIC has hovered between 2.9% and 4.8% over the past ten quarters, as per financial statements, while ROE surged to 28.2% in Q2 2026, indicating that returns are increasingly driven by financial leverage rather than operational efficiency.
The divergence between ROIC and ROE is stark: ROIC remains in the low single digits, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of integrated resorts, while ROE has more than tripled from 7.3% in Q4 2024 to 28.2% in Q2 2026. This suggests that equity returns are being amplified by a shrinking equity base—total equity fell from $4.0B to $581M over the period—rather than by genuine value creation. The company is not compounding returns on invested capital; instead, it is using leverage to boost shareholder returns, which may be unsustainable if operating margins continue to compress.
Working Capital Efficiency Remains Stable
Cash conversion cycle improved to 11 days in Q2 2026 from 6 days in Q1 2025, based on reported data, with DSO at 18 days and DPO at 10 days, indicating modest working capital efficiency despite revenue stagnation.
The CCC has lengthened slightly from 6 days in Q1 2025 to 11 days in Q2 2026, driven by a rise in DSO from 13 to 18 days, which may indicate slower collections from customers or a shift in payment terms. However, DIO remains minimal at 3 days, reflecting the service-oriented nature of the business, and DPO is stable at 10 days, suggesting limited supplier leverage. Asset turnover is extremely low at 0.15x, consistent with the heavy fixed-asset base, but this is a structural characteristic of the industry rather than a sign of operational inefficiency.
Debt Burden Intensifies as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity surged to 17.01 in Q2 2026 from 3.47 in Q1 2024, as per balance sheet data, while interest coverage fell to 3.44x, indicating a significantly more strained debt service capacity.
The dramatic rise in D/E is driven by both an increase in debt—total debt remains elevated at $15.3B—and a collapse in equity to just $581M, which amplifies the ratio. Interest coverage of 3.44x is below the 4.98x seen in Q1 2026 and the 4.30x in Q1 2024, suggesting that operating income is becoming less sufficient to cover interest expenses. While the absolute debt level has not changed dramatically, the shrinking equity base makes the balance sheet appear increasingly fragile, and any further earnings weakness could strain debt service further.
Liquidity Buffer Thins to Critical Levels
Current ratio fell to 1.00 in Q2 2026 from 1.30 in Q1 2024, with quick ratio at 0.99, as reported, indicating that current assets barely cover short-term obligations, leaving little cushion for operational shocks.
The current ratio has deteriorated from a comfortable 1.30 to exactly 1.00, meaning that the company has just enough current assets to cover its current liabilities. The quick ratio of 0.99 suggests that inventory is negligible, but the thin buffer provides limited protection against a sudden downturn in gaming demand or a tightening of credit markets. Cash stood at $3.4B, which provides some liquidity, but the combination of high leverage and a weak current ratio suggests that the company would be vulnerable to a severe stress scenario, such as a prolonged travel disruption.
P/E Misleads Amidst Depreciation and Leverage
The P/E ratio of 20.8x appears reasonable, but heavy depreciation and leverage distort earnings, making EV/EBITDA of 9.5x a more reliable valuation metric, as per reported figures, for this capital-intensive operator.
For Las Vegas Sands, net income is significantly impacted by large non-cash depreciation charges and interest expense, which can obscure the underlying cash-generating ability of the resorts. The P/E ratio of 20.8x may understate the company's value because EBITDA better captures the operating performance before these non-cash and financing costs. EV/EBITDA of 9.5x is below the peer average of Wynn (11.89x) and MGM (32.34x), suggesting the market may be pricing in higher risk or lower growth. Investors should focus on EV/EBITDA and free cash flow yield rather than P/E when evaluating LVS.